Spouse Citizenship

To jack's point, this is her 100% application, she is not obligated to answer and explain anything about your case (although, she was derivative beneficiary for LPR ). If USCIS has an issue, they can approach you which is very unlikely in this case at this point of time.
 
DreamUSA said:
To jack's point, this is her 100% application, she is not obligated to answer and explain anything about your case (although, she was derivative beneficiary for LPR ). If USCIS has an issue, they can approach you which is very unlikely in this case at this point of time.
Click to expand...

There was a post here sometime ago. The poster's wife was
the derivative GC holder. The wife went to citizenshipo interview
first and the IO found out or was told by the wife that there
was something like that the husband was laid off pretty much around
the time their GC were approved. The IO approved the wife's N400
and even kind enough to let the wife pass some of his suggestions
to her husband about how to answer questions when the husband's
interview come.
 
DreamUSA said:
To jack's point, this is her 100% application, she is not obligated to answer and explain anything about your case (although, she was derivative beneficiary for LPR ).
Click to expand...

The validity of derivative GC depends upon the validity of the
primary GC. We just do not know if USCIS still examnine the
validity of primary GC when interviewing the N400 for the
derivative GC holder.

DreamUSA said:
If USCIS has an issue, they can approach you which is very unlikely in this case at this point of time.
Click to expand...

Is USCIS allowed to be inconsistent? Say in the wife's case, USCIS
argue the husband's GC is good so the wife is OK but in the husbands' case
, the USCIS say the husband GC is not good or ther othe way around
 
Go ahead and let your wife apply for citizenship. Risk is low to zero. I very highly doubt it that your GC will come into the interview or processing of her application at all.
 
Jackolantern said:
And you are right, they cannot revoke the GC if it was granted in error and more than 5 years have passed before they initiate the revocation process. Once they pass the 5-year mark, they have to show in court that there was fraud, not just errors.
Click to expand...

There is a serious glitch in the process that GC can be granted without
either fraud or error to applicants who are deportable. I-485 does not ask whether applicants have ever registered to vote or voted before. So applicants who did voted before do not have to lie and USCIS can just aaarpoved I485 without making any mistake. But in N400 process applicants
then tell they did voted before. Don't know how USCIS can revoke such green card. They created a flawed I485 form to allow such thing happen

This is what happened in maslouj's case (http://forums.immigration.com/showthread.php?t=300543&highlight=maslouj). Of course luckily Maslouj's citizenship was approved.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
THANK YOU all for your suggestions/advice , I feel little better now,
I'll tell my wife not to answer anything about my employment history ( if it comes up in the interview)

I appreciate your time, I'll update this thread of any update we will have in near future.

Thanks again to all of you
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top