Hey there, I am new to this forum, I did lot of research but didn't find a similar case to ours. I am a Canadian PR since july 2009 and my husband is a Canadian citizen and a US GC holder. He had his interview in February 2009 and he were suppose to get his citizenship, but because his first GC was lost in the mail, the officer in the interview told him that you passed your interview but they were Investigating the lost GC and still till now, with a long backlog. He started commuting to Windsor daily from Detroit where he works since july 2009 to spend time with me, he didn't face any issue on the border until lately, the US side started asking him more question on why he is spending time in canda and how much, and from the begining he told them the truth, my wife is a Canadian PR, and I am waiting my citizenship in order to sponsor her, which is the truth, and in the interview as well , he told them that my wife will come soon to Canada and I will sponsor her to the US later. Since the end of November, he started only spending the weekend with me in Canada, because it has been 5 month of daily commute, and we don't want to have any issue with the immigration. By doing so, coming Saturday night ad leaving Monday morning to the US, and he alwyas have all the proof we have to the ties in US, house, 2 mortage, bills, US tax , his health insuarance, and he is self employee who has 50 employee , half of them US citizen, his car has a US plate and registered for his compagny...My question, doing this, and having all these proof will protect his GC ?? because from what we see and what the lawyer is telling us, they have a long queue of backlog work, and that it might take several months to finish the investigation and issue the oath letter.
Thank you in advance for your reply, and sorry for the long post, but since I am new here, I needed to post all this info to get the correct reply.
Thank you in advance for your reply, and sorry for the long post, but since I am new here, I needed to post all this info to get the correct reply.