140_takes_4ever said:Actually I agree, it was clearly labelled as SPAM, another reason why I din't want to make the decision on locking the thread. But hey calling for a lock is very reasonable under freedom of speach. Interesting dilemma for the moderator concerned (read rk4gc), since it is Kashmir's thread and I have washed my hands off this issue.
rk4gc said:You have a valid point, its a marked as SPAM. But I dont want a repetition of this kind of theads that waste resources here. No offense to any body.
rk4gc said:You have a valid point, its a marked as SPAM. But I dont want a repetition of this kind of theads that waste resources here. No offense to any body.
Actually it had 3 stars and it was my vote (5 star's) that bought it up to 4 But I agree, look at the hits, this thread is jumping.rk4gc said:Check it, this thread got 4 STARS .
Well if you read my post again you will understand I'm not talking about this thread only. And even about resources its just not bandwidth .gopher97 said:what resources are we talking about... bandwidth?
C'mon, this thread would have just died a natural death in a day or 2.
rk4gc said:Well if you read my post again you will understand I'm not talking about this thread only. And even about resources its just not bandwidth .
140_takes_4ever said:TGIF! You guys seem to have a lot of time on your hands. Been trying to get away from this forum and back to work, but someone keeps posting here every second and I am drawn to the drama.