Section 245(i), too late now ????

maxx

Registered Users (C)
Is the form 245(i) still valid ? Suppose a person was out of status at some point in his/her stay and missed the April 2001
deadline for filing the form ...AND BCIS finds this out and makes a strong case to deny his/her GC at the final stage ...can the person redeem himself/herself by filing form 245(i) ?


Maxx.
 
Originally posted by maxx
Is the form 245(i) still valid ? Suppose a person was out of status at some point in his/her stay and missed the April 2001
deadline for filing the form ...AND BCIS finds this out and makes a strong case to deny his/her GC at the final stage ...can the person redeem himself/herself by filing form 245(i)

There is no form 245i. It's a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act. There was no form to file to take advantage of it.

If your priority date is before April 30th, 2001, you are automatically eligible to seek relief under this section. BCIS will issue you with a Notice of Intent to Deny, and you will then file Form I-485A and pay the $1000 fine.

No matter what your priority date, if you have been out of status for less than 180 days before the I-485 filing, you can seek relief under 245k, and not pay any fine. Don't let an attorney railroad you into 245i if you are covered by 245k.
 
TherealCanadian,

Thank you very much for the reply. It was priceless for me ..indeed a HUGE load off my back .....

The case was EB3/NY/IND ..labor was filed in Oct. 99 ...All the cases became current in June '2001 ....hence I am not sure whether the Priority Date WAS before April 2001 ....

The total "out of status" days were 18 ( From Feb 8 th. till Feb 26 2001 ) and out of status meant not on any co's payroll ...the H1-B was valid ( as none of the emplyers cancelled it ) .... The I-140 was filed in July '2001 and 485 in Dec '2001.

If there is an Intent to deny .. I can easily used 245(k) ......WOW what a relief !!!!!


The reason I am asking is .. I went to several sites and they clearly state that technically ..one can;t be out of status for even a single day and the rule in this matter is quite clear ...I don;t know anything about the Section 245(k) ...Section 245(i) provision was for a brief period of time and I guess it ended in April '2001 ..


Thanx again for the info ....can you please tell me where I can get the info for the 245(k) ?


Regards,

Maxx.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Originally posted by maxx
The case was EB3/NY/IND ..labor was filed in Oct. 99 ...All the cases became current in June '2001 ....hence I am not sure whether the Priority Date WAS before April 2001 ....

In EB cases (except EB-1 and EB-2 NIW) the priority date is the date that the LC was filed. In the two special EB categories where no LC is needed, the priority date will be the receipt date of the I-140. In your case, your priority date appears to be October 1999, so no problem at all.

If there is an Intent to deny .. I can easily used 245(k) ......WOW what a relief !!!!! The reason I am asking is .. I went to several sites and they clearly state that technically ..one can;t be out of status for even a single day and the rule in this matter is quite clear ...I don;t know anything about the Section 245(k)

Actually, if you want light bedtime reading, take a look at the INA itself. Look for section 245 (which covers adjustment of status), and then find subsection K. Section 245 says that adjusting status is a (dubious) "privilege" that is given to those good folks who have never lost status. If you have ever been out of status (even for a single day) no AOS for you. However, there are three major exceptions:

Immediate relatives of US citizens (parents/spouses/minor children) can adjust at any time with no penalty.

Individuals with priority dates before 4/15/2001 (and physically present in the US on 12/22/2000 - don't forget this part!) can adjust status if they file an I-485A and pay $1000. (245i)

Beneficiaries of employment based petitions can adjust status if they have been out of status for 180 days or less. (245k)

There is a high likelihood that such a small out of status gap as yours may not even be noticed by BCIS, or if it is the ajudicator will be smart enough to understand 245k, so no need to worry much.
 
Thanx once again for the neat explanation ....it really helped me ....

Regards,

Maxx.
 
TheRealCanadian,


You mentioned in your previous post :-

"take a look at the INA itself" ...

Pardon my ignorance ...but can you tell me what is "INA" ?

I am not sure where to look for this ....


Maxx.
 
Top