Hi all,
I have been stuck in a name check for more than a year now, as many of you. I was so happy to hear about new memorandum from February this year, and I was anxiously waiting for the final approval of my GC.
However, on Thursday, I received a letter from the immigration that requires from my husband and me to come to the office for the "application for adjustment of status". The letter also states that "This interview will be video taped". The documents that we need to bring to the interview include only passport and my I-94. Other documents about the proof of shared life were not required (these documents were not checked on the letter that we have received).
I would like to mention that we have already passed our first interview 10 months ago, and I have been approved for a GC, but we had to wait for a name check to be complete. The IO stamped my passport stating the case is pending. We will be married for two years in October.
I am concerned what this new interview may mean, especially the fact that it would be video taped? If anyone had similar experience or heard for a similar case, please let me know.
Thanks
I have been stuck in a name check for more than a year now, as many of you. I was so happy to hear about new memorandum from February this year, and I was anxiously waiting for the final approval of my GC.
However, on Thursday, I received a letter from the immigration that requires from my husband and me to come to the office for the "application for adjustment of status". The letter also states that "This interview will be video taped". The documents that we need to bring to the interview include only passport and my I-94. Other documents about the proof of shared life were not required (these documents were not checked on the letter that we have received).
I would like to mention that we have already passed our first interview 10 months ago, and I have been approved for a GC, but we had to wait for a name check to be complete. The IO stamped my passport stating the case is pending. We will be married for two years in October.
I am concerned what this new interview may mean, especially the fact that it would be video taped? If anyone had similar experience or heard for a similar case, please let me know.
Thanks