San Francisco Regional DOL Tracker
- Thread starter usnycus
- Start date
gc_sparrow
Registered Users (C)
Labor substitution & Pending labor
Hi,
Is it possible to keep the pending labor certification application & use another pre-approved labor certification to concurrently file I140 & 485.
What will be PD in that case ?...
I want to keep the current labor going as a back-up...is it worth ?
thnx
Hi,
Is it possible to keep the pending labor certification application & use another pre-approved labor certification to concurrently file I140 & 485.
What will be PD in that case ?...
I want to keep the current labor going as a back-up...is it worth ?
thnx
Az application
I am in the same boat :: Az non RIR case with PD
ec03 RD:July04.. I thought our cases are still sleeping in SF DOL but not sure something changed recently (if so, the AVM messages don't reflect that) - If you hear anything let me know.
Thanks,
I am in the same boat :: Az non RIR case with PD
ec03 RD:July04.. I thought our cases are still sleeping in SF DOL but not sure something changed recently (if so, the AVM messages don't reflect that) - If you hear anything let me know.Thanks,
AZGC said:
Pareshan4GC
Registered Users (C)
gp111 said:
GP,
FYI: My SAN FRANCISCO DOL RD is Aug-2003. I received my 45 day letter on Mar-05.
where_is_it
Registered Users (C)
GP111,
What is your view on the BEC processing in terms of actual approval process.
1) Do you think ,they would place a software system to do the checks or would it be manual?
2) Would BEC wait to see how PERM is working and then they start their process?
3) Will they wait for all the 45-day letter responses to be recd at BEC before they start processing the cases?
Appreciate your views.
What is your view on the BEC processing in terms of actual approval process.
1) Do you think ,they would place a software system to do the checks or would it be manual?
2) Would BEC wait to see how PERM is working and then they start their process?
3) Will they wait for all the 45-day letter responses to be recd at BEC before they start processing the cases?
Appreciate your views.
gp111 said:
I would disagree with this point, since PERM and BEC processing is entirely in defferent standards, like Priv wage, restrictive requirements and etc.
Bec may not wait untill end May to start process.
If lot of cases are withdrawn may be its extension period of 24 - 30 months of operation may be effected. They may close the operation after intial term and may not get extensions for operation.
mnhrdc said:
My assumption is based on
http://www.murthy.com/news/n_newinf.html
BEC and PERM are Streamlining the LC Process
This effort is also part of the backlog reduction plan, as the DOL will be able to narrow its universe of cases by terminating those cases where the employers do not wish to go forward. The DOL has a stated estimated timeframe of 24-30 months from the implementation of PERM for the completion of its backlog reduction efforts. A final estimate is expected at some point after PERM is implemented and the DOL can judge how many cases will remain pending to be adjudicated under the old system and how many will be withdrawn from the backlog and re-filed under PERM.
The DOL has anticipated and hoped that employers will lean toward PERM and change pending cases over to the PERM process. This would reduce the work of the BECs. However, this change-over may not be very likely for many, due to the potential loss of the priority date. The filing date (priority date) has now become an issue for nationals of India, mainland China, and Philippines, a factor that the DOL may not have fully considered in its desire to shift its caseload towards PERM.
(Thanks to www.murthy.com)
juan_ramon
Registered Users (C)
DOL Update
This are some cases with updated status SFO.
09553673 certified
09553671 nof march 4
09553670 nof march4
09553665 certified
This are some cases with updated status SFO.
09553673 certified
09553671 nof march 4
09553670 nof march4
09553665 certified
gc_sparrow
Registered Users (C)
gp111 said:
Thanks guys, appreciated...
where_is_it
Registered Users (C)
Thanks for your views .
gp111 said:
My view was based on my collegues who's attorney's didnt allow to file concurrently even when VISA retrogression was not there.
However the Interiem Rule issued during July 31 2002 states that for filing I-485 concurrently VISA No.s must be availble for the allien . Being so with current retrogression is for March 2003 (India), how a person can file concurrently with susbstitution LC acquiring PD as March 2005 when he files his I-140?.
Quote"
Who Is Eligible To File Forms I–140 and I–485 Concurrently?
Forms I–140 and I–485 may be filed concurrently only when an immigrant
visa number is immediately available.This interim rule does not change the existing requirement that a visa number must be immediately available before analien can apply for permanent resident status. This interim rule simply applies to aliens who are classifiable under sections 203(b)(1), (2), and (3),of the Immigration and Nationality Act, allowing them to file the Forms I–140 and I–485 at the same time, but only when a visa is immediately available.
UnQuote"
Last edited by a moderator: