Pareshan4GC
Registered Users (C)
pleaseGOD said:How do you get these numbers? what are numbers for Auguest 2003 and September 2003?
Somebody posted these number somewhere on this thread. I just copied them.
pleaseGOD said:How do you get these numbers? what are numbers for Auguest 2003 and September 2003?
heh, you surely got more information from your lawyer than I got from mine. I still did not understand what date would they consider for FIFO, though.labor69 said:Hi,
I got some info from my attorney,
As we previously reported, the Backlog Reduction Centers (BRCs) have been staffed and are starting operations. They are located in Dallas and Philadelphia. Files located at the DOL in those two regions have already been transferred to the BRCs and are in the process of data entry at the new centers. In addition, 20,000 cases from San Francisco's DOL region have also been sent for data entry to the BRCs. Dallas, Philadelphia and San Francisco are the three regional offices with the largest backlogs and it is anticipated that they will be processed in date order on a First In/First Out basis. After these initial cases are cleared, the contractors at these backlog centers will monitor the sizes and backlogs and processing times at other regions and will determine the methodology for identifying and selecting batches of cases from the remaining regions to transfer to the centers.
labor69 said:Hi,
I got some info from my attorney...
.
sarathynp said:Thanks buddy.
If anybody get a chance again, please check whether they are sending both RIR an Non-RIR. Somewhere I read that they are sending only non-RIR.
labor69 said:Hi,
I got some info from my attorney,
As we previously reported, the Backlog Reduction Centers (BRCs) have been staffed and are starting operations. They are located in Dallas and Philadelphia. Files located at the DOL in those two regions have already been transferred to the BRCs and are in the process of data entry at the new centers. In addition, 20,000 cases from San Francisco's DOL region have also been sent for data entry to the BRCs. Dallas, Philadelphia and San Francisco are the three regional offices with the largest backlogs and it is anticipated that they will be processed in date order on a First In/First Out basis. After these initial cases are cleared, the contractors at these backlog centers will monitor the sizes and backlogs and processing times at other regions and will determine the methodology for identifying and selecting batches of cases from the remaining regions to transfer to the centers.
nogcnolife said:GCwaiter and All,
I took a couple of days off. When came back, I think I missed the discussions about the new developments.
We definitely should do something to pull ourselves out of the mud. Starting from seeking Rajiv's assistance is the best way (my personal opinion). Does anybody in this board have good relationship with Rajiv? Or, anybody at least know him? Please stand up and speak for us! If not, I've no problem to write the email. All I'm afraid is that my message won't bring much attention from Rajiv since it's from a stranger.
Hi Sandeep0902,sandeep0902 said:I shall call up Rajiv's office and get the idea about the requirements for intitiating a lititgation.I shall post the findings tomorrow.
vsaxena said:gcwait2002,
could you please verify whether it is 'Nov 04' or 'Dec 04'?
thanks
worker_bee said:You are right - we all tend to view/interpret the memo in a way that sounds favourable to us
Having said that, CA/SF SWA/DOL is one of the most backlogged in the country. A DOL RD date of Mar 2003 (currently being processed) transaltes to a SWA PD of Jan-Mar 2002 since it takes an avg 11-13 months for a case to be transmitted from PD to transmittal to DOL. That will make it one of the oldest cases in the national queue when it shows up at BEC.
Are you guys aware of any other region that is more backlogged than this?
That's $240 per case! Unbelievable! And it is only a “First part”.The 2004 Budget includes $72 million as the first part of a two-year drive to eliminate the 300,000-case backlog in the permanent foreign labor certification program.
will_get_there1 said:some recent certifications ..
DOL RD = 03/12/03, certified 10/25
09552625
09552629
09552632
09552653
DOL RD = 03/12/03, certified 10/26
09552649
09552662
09552664
09552680
09552682
DOL RD = 03/13/03, certified 10/26
09552633
09552634
sarathynp said:Hi Sandeep0902,
Thanks for your efforts. You may refer this quote from DOL website regarding RIR cases:
http://www.ows.doleta.gov/foreign/perm.asp
Reduction in Recruitment (RIR)
Since supervised recruitment is the most time-consuming aspect of the permanent process, use of RIR can significantly reduce the time required in the DOL process. It is possible that the DOL phase of employment-based visas can be accomplished in under one year using the RIR process.
sandeep0902 said:I just spoke to one of the attorneys in Rajiv Khanna's office and he is going to have a meeting with Rajiv and come back to me w.r.t requirements.He also asked me to mention the number of people who are in support of this.
As soon as I hear back from him,I shall post the requirements for the litigation process.
Thanks,
sandeep0902 said:Guys,
There is no much use of litigation at this stage,please see a note from Rajiv Khanna on our plans for a litigation:
We may have trouble there. USDOL has already initiated firm plans to
take
care of the backlogs. This may be a waste of your
money, guys.
I guess, we all have to wait and watch this new program being implemented nationwide.Hope this is ok w/everyone...