NEVER.vsaksena said:So when was the last time there was retrogression of this magnitude in recent history? across all EB categories (1, 2nd & 3rd)?
Jackolantern said:NEVER.
vsaksena said:So when was the last time there was retrogression of this magnitude in recent history? across all EB categories (1, 2nd & 3rd)?
popoye said:Any one any ideas why no bulleting yet ?
neocor said:If your fortune 50 lawyer has any credibility then this news is not negative at all. As long as the PD's dont move further back then it definately is good news.
But I would question the credibility of their information. As of today I dont think any lawyere would say anything at all regarding any kind of movement in Pd's. Also I dont think they have any idea what is going on with the USCIS.
But lets hope your fortune 50 lawyer really happen to know something. If so then this is definately good news that the PD's will move forward come 2006.
Everyone knows and its practically given that the dates dfinately wont move forward in the remaining months of 2005.
neocor
MDGUTS1307 said:Infostarved,
Could you please re-do the calculations with the scenario that spouses and kids do not get counted. How much of impact will that have ?
sjgc1 said:If the bill passes, then how soon is it going to affect our life? I mean, is it going to be applied right after or like from Oct 2006 or later?
Thanks.
it would be instructive to check the history of AC21 passage, signing by the president and implenentation to understand how fast it can be expected that these provisions can be implemented. these are part of the budget reconciliation package, though; hence could be faster.GCdreamer2006 said:The name "relief" implies urgency in my opinion, but it is too early. I am talking to a person in the House of Reps who should clarify hopefully next week.
sjgc1 said:If the bill passes, then how soon is it going to affect our life? I mean, is it going to be applied right after or like from Oct 2006 or later?
Thanks.