Airspray
Active Member
Hi everyone,
Somehow it's gone unnoticed here in the forum, but something potentially very critical happened a few days ago - the supreme court approved this new rule and it's now in effect.
I've read many articles about it but I still don't fully understand its implementation and meaning for DV winners. Most of the articles mention it's mostly about using public benefits but unless you're someone who's applying for AOS, we obviously did not use those benefits. Nor have we filed tax returns, have professional licences (ie. physician license) or have job offers. I'm quite confused at what exactly is now different for us. Do we ALL now need this DS-5540 or is it only requested on those instances where the I-134 is requested? Can this rule be challenged and potentially blocked once again even though it's the supreme court who approved it?
Would appreciate your 2 cents.
Somehow it's gone unnoticed here in the forum, but something potentially very critical happened a few days ago - the supreme court approved this new rule and it's now in effect.
I've read many articles about it but I still don't fully understand its implementation and meaning for DV winners. Most of the articles mention it's mostly about using public benefits but unless you're someone who's applying for AOS, we obviously did not use those benefits. Nor have we filed tax returns, have professional licences (ie. physician license) or have job offers. I'm quite confused at what exactly is now different for us. Do we ALL now need this DS-5540 or is it only requested on those instances where the I-134 is requested? Can this rule be challenged and potentially blocked once again even though it's the supreme court who approved it?
Would appreciate your 2 cents.