Project "Ocean" : Become a U.S. Citizen by 2008 Election !!

Hi Kashmir,

In the update on lews law website, it mentions of a Pilot program for EB2. Does this pilot program cover concurrent only cases or covers all cases? I will appreciate your insight.


Take care...
 
INS best friend said:
I remember one publication right after or before the last election which was about an research on voting activity among different groups of US citizens. That showed that immigrants are way more active and pro-American than "old" citizens were. I could not find that document. If you happen to come across something like this please let everyone in the forum know. I think it is one more good argument for Kasmir's proposition. That will touch politicians' hearts more than any words of fairness. ;-)

I think it's obvious because immigrant feel more desire to attach themselves with political procedure - especially people who came from countries with have civil unreset, no democracy or partial democracy. On the other and, lots of "old" citizens either don't understand how much privileged they are or they are very pissed off with political system. That's why in presidential election, the turnout is 52-54% here.
 
cal_aos_waiting said:
Hi Kashmir,
In the update on lews law website, it mentions of a Pilot program for EB2. Does this pilot program cover concurrent only cases or covers all cases? I will appreciate your insight.
Take care...
In my understanding, the CSC Pilot Program covers only EB-2 NIW cases which I-140 and I-485 being concurrently filed.
It is different from Fujie's memo about concurrent adjudication.
 
Ina: Act 201 - Worldwide Level Of Immigration

INA: ACT 201 - WORLDWIDE LEVEL OF IMMIGRATION 1/

Sec. 201. [8 U.S.C. 1151]

(a) In general. - Exclusive of aliens described in subsection (b), aliens born in a foreign state or dependent area who may be issued immigrant visas or who may otherwise acquire the status of an alien lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence are limited to-

...

(2) employment-based immigrants described in section 203(b) (or who are admitted under section 211(a) on the basis of a prior issuance of a visa to their accompanying parent under section 203(b)), in a number not to exceed in any fiscal year the number specified in subsection (d) for that year, and not to exceed in any of the first 3 quarters of any fiscal year 27 percent of the worldwide level under such subsection for all of such fiscal year; and

...

(d) Worldwide level of employment-based immigrants

(1) The worldwide level of employment-based immigrants under this subsection for a fiscal year is equal to-

(A) 140,000 plus

(B) the number computed under paragraph (2).

(2)(A) The number computer under this paragraph for fiscal year 1992 is zero.

(B) The number computed under this paragraph for fiscal year 1993 is the difference (if any) between the worldwide level established under paragraph (1) for the previous fiscal year and the number of visas issued under section 203(b) during that fiscal year.

(C) The number computed under this paragraph for a subsequent fiscal year is the difference (if any) between the maximum number of visas which may be issued under section 203(a) (relating to family-sponsored immigrants) during the previous fiscal year and the number of visas issued under that section during that year.

...
 
kashmir,
this is what I had mentioned earlier to I believe Rajiv also. The very fact that there is a quota for the GC's in a year, the govt has an implied responsibility to follow FIFO.
some people are benefitted but the approach to reduce backlog this way is totally irrational and window dressing of the accounting. This is not going to solve the problem in the long term. Who knows what happens to their new promises a year later.
 
Kashmir,
Based on the text in your last posting in this thread, looks like there will be a limit to the number of 485s being approved this year. Is this correct?

If yes, would you know how close we are to the limit for this year?

Regards...
 
Ina: Act 203 - Allocation Of Immigrant Visas

INA: ACT 203 - ALLOCATION OF IMMIGRANT VISAS

Sec. 203. [8 U.S.C. 1153]

(a) Preference Allocation for Family-Sponsored Immigrants. ...

...

(b) Preference Allocation for Employment-Based Immigrants. - Aliens subject to the worldwide level specified in section 201(d) for employment-based immigrants in a fiscal year shall be allotted visas as follows:

(1) Priority workers. - Visas shall first be made available in a number not to exceed 28.6 percent of such worldwide level, plus any visas not required for the classes specified in paragraphs (4) and (5), to qualified immigrants who are aliens described in any of the following subparagraphs (A) through (C):

(A) Aliens with extraordinary ability. - An alien is described in this subparagraph if -

(i) the alien has extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics which has been demonstrated by sustained national or international acclaim and whose achievements have been recognized in the field through extensive documentation,

(ii) the alien seeks to enter the United States to continue work in the area of extraordinary ability, and

(iii) the alien's entry into the United States will substantially benefit prospectively the United States.

(B) Outstanding professors and researchers. -An alien is described in this subparagraph if -

(i) the alien is recognized internationally as outstanding in a specific academic area,

(ii) the alien has at least 3 years of experience in teaching or research in the academic area, and

(iii) the alien seeks to enter the United States-

(I) for a tenured position (or tenure-track position) within a university or institution of higher education to teach in the academic area,

(II) for a comparable position with a university or institution of higher education to conduct research in the area, or

(III) for a comparable position to conduct research in the area with a department, division, or institute of a private employer, if the department, division, or institute employs at least 3 persons full-time in research activities and has achieved documented accomplishments in an academic field.

(C) Certain multinational executives and managers. An alien is described in this subparagraph if the alien, in the 3 years preceding the time of the alien's application for classification and admission into the United States under this subparagraph, has been employed for at least 1 year by a firm or corporation or other legal entity or an affiliate or subsidiary thereof and the alien seeks to enter the United States in order to continue to render services to the same employer or to a subsidiary or affiliate thereof in a capacity that is managerial or executive.

(2) Aliens who are members of the professions holding advanced degrees or aliens of exceptional ability. -

(A) In general. - Visas shall be made available, in a number not to exceed 28.6 percent of such worldwide level, plus any visas not required for the classes specified in paragraph (1), to qualified immigrants who are members of the professions holding advanced degrees or their equivalent or who because of their exceptional ability in the sciences, arts, or business, will substantially benefit prospectively the national economy, cultural or educational interests, or welfare of the United States, and whose services in the sciences, arts, professions, or business are sought by an employer in the United States.

(B) (i) 1/ 1a/ Subject to clause (ii), the Attorney General may, when the Attorney General deems it to be in the national interest, waive the requirements of subparagraph (A) that an alien's services in the sciences, arts, professions, or business be sought by an employer in the United States.

(ii)(I) The Attorney General shall grant a national interest waiver pursuant to clause (i) on behalf of any alien physician with respect to whom a petition for preference classification has been filed under subparagraph (A) if--

(aa) the alien physician agrees to work full time as a physician in an area or areas designated by the Secretary of Health and Human Services as having a shortage of health care professionals or at a health care facility under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs; and

(bb) a Federal agency or a department of public health in any State has previously determined that the alien physician's work in such an area or at such facility was in the public interest.

(II) No permanent resident visa may be issued to an alien physician described in subclause (I) by the Secretary of State under section 204(b), and the Attorney General may not adjust the status of such an alien physician from that of a nonimmigrant alien to that of a permanent resident alien under section 245, until such time as the alien has worked full time as a physician for an aggregate of 5 years (not including the time served in the status of an alien described in section 101(a)(15)(J)), in an area or areas designated by the Secretary of Health and Human Services as having a shortage of health care professionals or at a health care facility under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

(III) Nothing in this subparagraph may be construed to prevent the filing of a petition with the Attorney General for classification under section 204(a), or the filing of an application for adjustment of status under section 245, by an alien physician described in subclause (I) prior to the date by which such alien physician has completed the service described in subclause (II).

(IV) The requirements of this subsection do not affect waivers on behalf of alien physicians approved under section 203(b)(2)(B) before the enactment date of this subsection. In the case of a physician for whom an application for a waiver was filed under section 203(b)(2)(B) prior to November 1, 1998, the Attorney General shall grant a national interest waiver pursuant to section 203(b)(2)(B) except that the alien is required to have worked full time as a physician for an aggregate of 3 years (not including time served in the status of an alien described in section 101(a)(15)(J)) before a visa can be issued to the alien under section 204(b) or the status of the alien is adjusted to permanent resident under section 245.

(C) Determination of exceptional ability. - In determining under subparagraph (A) whether an immigrant has exceptional ability, the possession of a degree, diploma, certificate, or similar award from a college, university, school, or other institution of learning or a license to practice or certification for a particular profession or occupation shall not by itself be considered sufficient evidence of such exceptional ability.

(3) Skilled workers, professionals, and other workers.-

(A) In general. - Visas shall be made available, in a number not to exceed 28.6 percent of such worldwide level, plus any visas not required for the classes specified in paragraphs (1) and (2), to the following classes of aliens who are not described in paragraph (2):

(i) Skilled workers. - Qualified immigrants who are capable, at the time of petitioning for classification under this paragraph, of performing skilled labor (requiring at least 2 years training or experience), not of a temporary or seasonal nature, for which qualified workers are not available in the United States.

(ii) Professionals. - Qualified immigrants who hold baccalaureate degrees and who are members of the professions.

(iii) Other workers. - Other qualified immigrants who are capable, at the time of petitioning for classification under this paragraph, of performing unskilled labor, not of a temporary or seasonal nature, for which qualified workers are not available in the United States.

(B) Limitation on other workers. - Not more than 10,000 of the visas made available under this paragraph in any fiscal year may be available for qualified immigrants described in subparagraph (A)(iii).

(C) Labor certification required.- An immigrant visa may not be issued to an immigrant under subparagraph (A) until the consular officer is in receipt of a determination made by the Secretary of Labor pursuant to the provisions of section 212(a)(5)(A).

...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ina: Act 204 - Procedure For Granting Immigrant Visas

INA: ACT 204 - PROCEDURE FOR GRANTING IMMIGRANT VISAS

Sec. 204. [8 U.S.C. 1154]

(a)(1)(A)(i) ...

...

(E) 10/ Any alien desiring to be classified under section 203(b)(1)(A), or any person on behalf of such an alien, may file a petition with the Attorney General for such classification.

(F) 10/ Any employer desiring and intending to employ within the United States an alien entitled to classification under section 203(b)(1)(B), 203(b)(1)(C), 203(b)(2), or 203(b)(3) may file a petition with the Attorney General for such classification.

...

(b) After an investigation of the facts in each case, and after consultation with the Secretary of Labor with respect to petitions to accord a status under section 203(b)(2) or 203(b)(3), the Attorney General shall, if he determines that the facts stated in the petition are true and that the alien in behalf of whom the petition is made is an immediate relative specified in section 201(b) or is eligible for preference under subsection (a) or (b) of section 203, approve the petition and forward one copy thereof to the Department of State. The Secretary of State shall then authorize the consular officer concerned to grant the preference status.

...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ina: Act 316 - Requierments As To Residence, ...

INA: ACT 316 - REQUIERMENTS AS TO RESIDENCE, GOOD MORAL CHARACTER, ATTACHMENT TO THE PRINCIPLES OF THE CONSTITUTION, AND FAVORABLE DISPOSITION TO THE UNITED STATES

Sec. 316. [8 U.S.C. 1427]

(a) No person, except as otherwise provided in this title, shall be naturalized, unless such applicant, (1) immediately preceding the date of filing his application for naturalization has resided continuously, after being lawfully admitted for permanent residence, within the United States for at least five years and during the five years immediately preceding the date of filing his application has been physically present therein for periods totaling at least half of that time, and who has resided within the State or within the district of the Service in the United States in which the applicant filed the application for at least three months, (2) has resided continuously within the United States from the date of the application up to the time of admission to citizenship, (3) during all the periods referred to in this subsection has been and still is a person of good moral character, attached to the principles of the Constitution of the United States, and well disposed to the good order and happiness of the United States.

...
 
Bill (proposal) to ammend INA for 5-year requirement

SEC. 101. FIVE-YEAR RESIDENCE REQUIREMENT FOR NATURALIZATION
(a) Section 316(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1427(a)(1)) is amended by inserting "after the petition for the immigrant visa under section 204(a) is filed or" before "after being lawfully admitted for permanent residence".


Here, the "petition for the immigrant visa under section 204(a)" means I-140 (or I-130).

(6/28/2004)
This is my proposal, and it's not been introduced yet.
We need to work with some Congressional members to introduce a new bill.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Three Successful Initiatives for Congressional Offices

  1. kashmir / Anna Eshoo (D CA 14) / CSC
    Anna Eshoo wrote to CSC Director Don Neufeld on 11/11/2003, then
    Don Neufeld responded to Anna Eshoo on 12/20/2003.
    Actually, I-485 process at the CSC has been improved since April 2004.

  2. tr22 / Lammer Smith (R TX 21) / TSC
    tr22 and 8 folks had been contacting Lammer Smith for almost two years, and finally succeeded to improve I-485 process at the TSC.
    As you know, the TSC used to have been the slowest service center through early this year, however, it has caught up to others now.

  3. kuldeepc / Zoe Lofgren (D CA 16)
    kuldeepc has been working with Zoe Lofgren's office for a half year on the bipartisan letter requesting the backlog elimination to USCIS Director, and it was signed by 44 Congressional members and sent to Eduardo Aguirre on 6/15/2004.

Code:
[B][url=http://immigrationportal.com/showthread.php?p=825107#post825107]I-485 Processing Date History for All Service Centers as of 6/23/2004[/url][/B]

Date       CSC        NSC        TSC        VSC
----------^----------^----------^----------^----------
01/15/2003 11/16/2001 08/01/2001 11/01/2000 10/15/2001
10/01/2003 12/16/2001
10/15/2003 12/16/2001
11/06/2003            08/17/2001 01/23/2001 01/15/2002
11/14/2003 12/16/2001 08/17/2001 01/23/2001 01/15/2002
11/20/2003 12/16/2001 08/24/2001 02/01/2001 01/15/2002
12/08/2003 12/16/2001 08/27/2001 02/01/2001 01/15/2002
12/19/2003 12/16/2001 08/27/2001 04/01/2001 01/31/2002
01/07/2004 12/16/2001 09/06/2001 04/01/2001 01/31/2002
01/22/2004 12/16/2001 09/06/2001 04/16/2001 01/31/2002
02/06/2004 12/16/2001 09/30/2001 05/08/2001 01/31/2002
02/20/2004 12/16/2001 09/30/2001 05/23/2001 01/31/2002
03/04/2004 12/16/2001 09/30/2001 06/13/2001 01/31/2002
03/22/2004 01/09/2002 09/30/2001 07/16/2001 02/15/2002
04/08/2004 01/09/2002 09/26/2001 08/21/2001 02/15/2002
04/22/2004 01/30/2002 12/01/2001 09/17/2001 02/15/2002
05/06/2004 03/01/2002 12/15/2001 11/15/2001 02/15/2002
05/19/2004 03/01/2002 12/15/2001 01/02/2002 02/15/2002
06/04/2004 04/15/2002 01/15/2002 01/07/2002 02/15/2002
06/23/2004 05/15/2002 01/15/2002 01/15/2002 02/15/2002
----------^----------^----------^----------^----------
 
Three Factors to Have Improved I-485 Process especiallly at the CSC (my opinion)

  1. I-485 Litigation
    ImmigratoinPortal.COM filed a lawsuit against USCIS on 12/22/2003.
    CSC Director Don Neufeld is one of defendents.

  2. Congressional members
    Anna Eshoo and some Congressional members wrote directly to Don Neufeld,
    and Don Neufeld had to promise to improve I-485 process from April 2004.

  3. CIS Ombudsman Khatri
    We had a e-mail campaign to Mr. Prakash Khatri, and he repliied us.
    I guess that Prakash Khatri talked to Don Neufeld early in April 2004.
 
a suggestion

Kashmir,

I have a suggestion. Instead of having USCIS issue an EAD it would be better if the original 485 receipt notice can itself be used as employment authorization for say 2 years. This would take away one of the bottlenecks in USCIS service and will give the applicants the much required work authorization. The approval notice in conjunction with SS card and a picture ID should be made acceptable for I-9 purposes. USCIS already does something similar for H1 extensions, ther approval notice is a valid employment authorization for 240 days until the H1 transfer is approved.

To take is a step further, even Advance parole can simply be the original 485 approval notice.

Another possible alternative suggestion is to have USCIS designate the EAD card as also valid for travel, to be used as advance parole.
 
Bill to amend 5-year INA rule

kashmir said:
SEC. 101. FIVE-YEAR RESIDENCE REQUIREMENT FOR NATURALIZATION
(a) Section 316(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1427(a)(1)) is amended by inserting "after the petition for the immigrant visa under section 204(a) is filed or" before "after being lawfully admitted for permanent residence".


Here, the "petition for the immigrant visa under section 204(a)" means I-140 (or I-130).

kashmir, is this already being considered by the Congress or is it one of your new campaigns? Obviously, I would like to participate. I am out of commission in July due to my vacation. But after I am back, I will assist you in this campaign.

Regards!
 
nkm-oct23 said:
Kashmir,

I have a suggestion. Instead of having USCIS issue an EAD it would be better if the original 485 receipt notice can itself be used as employment authorization for say 2 years. This would take away one of the bottlenecks in USCIS service and will give the applicants the much required work authorization. The approval notice in conjunction with SS card and a picture ID should be made acceptable for I-9 purposes. USCIS already does something similar for H1 extensions, ther approval notice is a valid employment authorization for 240 days until the H1 transfer is approved.

To take is a step further, even Advance parole can simply be the original 485 approval notice.

Another possible alternative suggestion is to have USCIS designate the EAD card as also valid for travel, to be used as advance parole.

If such a change as the one you have proposed takes effect how do you think USCIS will earn money, they will lose all the money earned from multiple EADs, APs etc. Do you think they will be willing to forego the money? Just curious hence my $0.02
 
nkm-oct23 said:
What about a fee increase for 485?
i have not compared those two (the fee increase as against multiple EAD and APs) but may be through the fee increase they probably have taken care of that and your idea might work but we cannot say anything until the day something concrete takes effect from USCIS.
 
cosmos said:
kashmir, is this already being considered by the Congress or is it one of your new campaigns? Obviously, I would like to participate. I am out of commission in July due to my vacation. But after I am back, I will assist you in this campaign.
Regards!
It's not been introduced yet, so I plan a new campaign.
 
kashmir said:
SEC. 101. FIVE-YEAR RESIDENCE REQUIREMENT FOR NATURALIZATION
(a) Section 316(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1427(a)(1)) is amended by inserting "after the petition for the immigrant visa under section 204(a) is filed or" before "after being lawfully admitted for permanent residence".


Here, the "petition for the immigrant visa under section 204(a)" means I-140 (or I-130).


This is my proposal, and it's not been introduced yet.
We need to work with some Congressional members to introduce a new bill.
Do you have any better idea or any comment ?
Otherwise, I will include this statement in the next campaign letter.
 
kashmir said:

(a) No person, except as otherwise provided in this title, shall be naturalized, unless such applicant, (1) immediately preceding the date of filing his application for naturalization has resided continuously, after being lawfully admitted for permanent residence, within the United States for at least five years and during the five years immediately preceding the date of filing his application has been physically present therein for periods totaling at least half of that time, and who has resided within the State or within the district of the Service in the United States in which the applicant filed the application for at least three months...

kashmir said:
SEC. 101. FIVE-YEAR RESIDENCE REQUIREMENT FOR NATURALIZATION
(a) Section 316(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1427(a)(1)) is amended by inserting " after the petition for the immigrant visa under section 204(a) is filed or" before "after being lawfully admitted for permanent residence".


Here, the "petition for the immigrant visa under section 204(a)" means I-140 (or I-130).

(6/28/2004)
This is my proposal, and it's not been introduced yet.
We need to work with some Congressional members to introduce a new bill.

kashmir said:
Do you have any better idea or any comment?
Otherwise, I will include this statement in the next campaign letter.

Starting the clock from 140-stage is better than 485-stage which is better than 485-approved-stage. That still excludes some people who might suffer quite a bit due to labor delays (due to employer issues, DOL delays, lawyer delays, etc). In an ideal situation, each stage (labor, 140, 485) of immigration should take six months (or less) to process. A person should get a GC within about 1.5 years. Add another 5 years residency requirement to naturalize. Which means a person should be able to naturalize in 6.5 years. I think that should be our goal. The INA act should be as follows:

“…
(a) No person, except as otherwise provided in this title, shall be naturalized, unless such applicant, (1) immediately preceding the date of filing his application for naturalization has resided continuously, after being lawfully admitted for permanent residence, within the United States for at least five years, or has resided continuously within the United States for six and half years, and has been lawfully admitted for permanent residence, and during the five years immediately preceding the date of filing his application has been physically present therein for periods totaling at least half of that time, and who has resided within the State or within the district of the Service in the United States in which the applicant filed the application for at least three months…”

What do you guys think? Whether or not we are able to get this accomplished is another matter. At least, this should be our objective.

Regards!
 
Top