patienceGC
Registered Users (C)
my last
I thought I'd follow asdasd and keep my fingers tied but I couldn’t resist dma_va's posting.
Christians have always been accused of "conversion" or proselytizing. Even mother Theresa was accused of it and was attacked. The missionary who was killed was helping lepers. How many hindus help lepers? If someone cares for people like that he/she has every right to do influence them. They are not inciting violence, they are not physically abusing them. Hasn’t any hindu on this board not been eager to discuss Hinduism with locals? We always feel happy to see someone following our culture be it eating a dosa or wearing a saree. The last I heard was Dara singh who apparently burned the missionary along with his kids was supposed to contest an election. What the phuck is wrong with our people???
If you know the story about Mother Teresa she was constantly being harassed by hindu priests from a nearby Kali temple. One day a priest had fallen severely ill (don’t know if it was leprosy). The Hindus apparently threw him out of the colony and guess what, Mother picked him up and cared for him. The priests never troubled her again. But there are still people who think what she did was wrong.
What I am trying to convey is that if someone is converting to another it is because he or she is getting some benefit from it. If Hindu people want to maintain numbers why don’t they help the same people? So that the others don’t get a chance? On the contrary the same people will be ostracized as untouchables long after the bald ol great soul banned it! So its better for them to be Hindu live worse than animals in poverty and social prestige than follow other religion where they can be better off at least monetarily?
Please do not even attempt to call RSS as a noble organization. It has deteriorated to mindless fanatic organization that is to confuse nationalism with religious fundamentalism. If there is someone on this board who justifies Gandhiji's assassination, I don’t even think there is any point in arguing with him/her.
Also the last I heard, the queen did apologize when she visited India but I am not sure. Has the Indian govt apologized for the unnecessary killing of Srilankan Tamils?
As previously mentioned, this thread will run for pages. So I'll stop here.
Thanks!
I thought I'd follow asdasd and keep my fingers tied but I couldn’t resist dma_va's posting.
Christians have always been accused of "conversion" or proselytizing. Even mother Theresa was accused of it and was attacked. The missionary who was killed was helping lepers. How many hindus help lepers? If someone cares for people like that he/she has every right to do influence them. They are not inciting violence, they are not physically abusing them. Hasn’t any hindu on this board not been eager to discuss Hinduism with locals? We always feel happy to see someone following our culture be it eating a dosa or wearing a saree. The last I heard was Dara singh who apparently burned the missionary along with his kids was supposed to contest an election. What the phuck is wrong with our people???
If you know the story about Mother Teresa she was constantly being harassed by hindu priests from a nearby Kali temple. One day a priest had fallen severely ill (don’t know if it was leprosy). The Hindus apparently threw him out of the colony and guess what, Mother picked him up and cared for him. The priests never troubled her again. But there are still people who think what she did was wrong.
What I am trying to convey is that if someone is converting to another it is because he or she is getting some benefit from it. If Hindu people want to maintain numbers why don’t they help the same people? So that the others don’t get a chance? On the contrary the same people will be ostracized as untouchables long after the bald ol great soul banned it! So its better for them to be Hindu live worse than animals in poverty and social prestige than follow other religion where they can be better off at least monetarily?
Please do not even attempt to call RSS as a noble organization. It has deteriorated to mindless fanatic organization that is to confuse nationalism with religious fundamentalism. If there is someone on this board who justifies Gandhiji's assassination, I don’t even think there is any point in arguing with him/her.
Also the last I heard, the queen did apologize when she visited India but I am not sure. Has the Indian govt apologized for the unnecessary killing of Srilankan Tamils?
As previously mentioned, this thread will run for pages. So I'll stop here.
Thanks!