PBEC:Cases from 2001 and early 2002 that are stuck
- Thread starter saknia
- Start date
does any one know about the software system they are using to store data? are the cases being skipped because of some sort of bug?
Whenever I call the PBEC number they always say that they are processing cases in the order they are getting it out of the system.....
should we raise this issue with some one?
Whenever I call the PBEC number they always say that they are processing cases in the order they are getting it out of the system.....
should we raise this issue with some one?
narayana_pan
Registered Users (C)
Hi saknia / Sr.members
HI saknia / Sr.members
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi saknia / Sr.members
Today Morning I got the following mail from PBEC can you pls tell what it means????
************************************************** **
Dear Requester:
The purpose of this letter is to acknowledge your request for reinstatement of the above referenced case.
To obtain answers to frequently asked questions, please visit the following website at:
************************************************** ****
HI saknia / Sr.members
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi saknia / Sr.members
Today Morning I got the following mail from PBEC can you pls tell what it means????
************************************************** **
Dear Requester:
The purpose of this letter is to acknowledge your request for reinstatement of the above referenced case.
To obtain answers to frequently asked questions, please visit the following website at:
************************************************** ****
Rajiv's response to 3 options.
All,
We know that most of the people are not willing to give thier personal info (case#, company name .......) for the Rajiv's 3 options which got mentioned in the last Friday conf call . So our hands are tight not to disclose personal info for this matter to Rajiv's office because of binding with current company/attorney..
I asked the same question to Rajiv and here is his response.
"Not much else we can do. A FOIA request does not involve giving any personal info. We can try that."
I am waiting for his response , how to go about FOIA process.
I will update soon on this.
-Sacbee
All,
We know that most of the people are not willing to give thier personal info (case#, company name .......) for the Rajiv's 3 options which got mentioned in the last Friday conf call . So our hands are tight not to disclose personal info for this matter to Rajiv's office because of binding with current company/attorney..
I asked the same question to Rajiv and here is his response.
"Not much else we can do. A FOIA request does not involve giving any personal info. We can try that."
I am waiting for his response , how to go about FOIA process.
I will update soon on this.
-Sacbee
llc_082002
New Member
updated
Has any one has any information regarding why some of the cases are being stuck and PBEC is not following any particular order. Once the 45 day letter has been received by the PBEC and the case has been entered into their system, there should be some order of approving cases. It is ironic that people who has the same priority date and whose cases went to Dallas BEC got their green cards in already and we are left in the dark.
sacbee said:
All,
Here is the reply from Rajiv regarding FOIA, with out sharing our personal info.
==============================================
"Remind me next week. I will assign someone to it. Send me a list of questions you would like answered. They have to be generic".
=============================================
Folks,
You can post your general concerns regarding skipped cases of 2001 and 2002 ASAP.
ladude10, saknia, whereismy_gc: Can you make general list to be asked for PBEC.
-sacbee
Here is the reply from Rajiv regarding FOIA, with out sharing our personal info.
==============================================
"Remind me next week. I will assign someone to it. Send me a list of questions you would like answered. They have to be generic".
=============================================
Folks,
You can post your general concerns regarding skipped cases of 2001 and 2002 ASAP.
ladude10, saknia, whereismy_gc: Can you make general list to be asked for PBEC.
-sacbee
sacbee said:
Last edited by a moderator:
Here are some questions:
1. why cases that were shipped together not being processed in FIFO order?
2. when will these cases with earlier PDs be processed?
3. can we have a paid system to help us quickly get case status and expected time of approval?
4. what determines the processing order? priority date/Regional date/PBEC data entry date or a combination of these?
1. why cases that were shipped together not being processed in FIFO order?
2. when will these cases with earlier PDs be processed?
3. can we have a paid system to help us quickly get case status and expected time of approval?
4. what determines the processing order? priority date/Regional date/PBEC data entry date or a combination of these?
ladude10 said:
generic questions
Hi Ladude10,
Here are some questions that we need to clarify.
1. On what basis PBEC is giving approvals.
2. Why there is no response even if we did reply 45-day letter 15 months ago
BTW when I call (484) 270-1568 for status update as usaul one lady redirest me to a recorded mesg and the voice mesg is syaing that PBEC is moving all the cases to new automated system and there will be new 45-day letter sent to everybody. I'm confused with that message. Did anybody tried calling this number?
Hi Ladude10,
Here are some questions that we need to clarify.
1. On what basis PBEC is giving approvals.
2. Why there is no response even if we did reply 45-day letter 15 months ago
BTW when I call (484) 270-1568 for status update as usaul one lady redirest me to a recorded mesg and the voice mesg is syaing that PBEC is moving all the cases to new automated system and there will be new 45-day letter sent to everybody. I'm confused with that message. Did anybody tried calling this number?
sacbee said:
Hi Sacbee
While I respect people Privacy with the Case information a General inquiry to invoke FOIA could be very broad and the type of questions we plan to ask might not come under that.
Are we sure that all are not ready to part with the Case information to Rajiv.
If Rajiv set up a contact person in his offcie then mamany might give the information
Memebers - Post if you are ready to part information to Rajiv securly on your case. That way atalest the PBEC might think why to antagonize this small group and pull out these cases and work these out quickly
If our Lawyers are not suggesting not to give then the Very Best option we have is to ask that Attorney to work and oush our case
A general FOIA eqnuiry will not yield the expected result we were planning. PBEC might give a canned reply and what we will do next
Rajiv is nice. Based on our Reservation for not giving the case information this is the Best he can do
I am not for a General enquiry for this sort. Please continue with your efforts and count me out for this
I am willing to provide my case information to Rajiv's firm securely. I have written lots of letters to Congressmen etc. with my case details, it won't hurt to share with Rajiv if he is willing to do so much for us. I agree with Saknia that a General Enquiry will not get us anywhere.
tanveer666
New Member
I have no problem either
I also have no problem in providing all the information about my case to Rajiv
We are already in hell in anyway
I also have no problem in providing all the information about my case to Rajiv
We are already in hell in anyway
All,
As of now only 3 are said ok to send their info to Rajiv.
Saknia , I will include you also for this effort so it is 4.
We will do both FOIA and also "Privacy act" options together. If those who are interested to give their data to Rajiv please come forward and let us know ASAP so that we can work on dates when to send and where to send your info.........
Ladude10: Please come up with general question list to send Rajiv.
Note: We need to send above mentioned to Rajiv by Wednesday.
Time is short, please respond ASAP.
-Sacbee
As of now only 3 are said ok to send their info to Rajiv.
Saknia , I will include you also for this effort so it is 4.
We will do both FOIA and also "Privacy act" options together. If those who are interested to give their data to Rajiv please come forward and let us know ASAP so that we can work on dates when to send and where to send your info.........
Ladude10: Please come up with general question list to send Rajiv.
Note: We need to send above mentioned to Rajiv by Wednesday.
Time is short, please respond ASAP.
-Sacbee
saknia said: