Originally posted by cinta
I think we have been very careful so far with no results, at least for people suffering from 2001.
Thanks for the dialogue however.
What I was trying to point out is what is CIS, what is ICE, who gets the money and resources, who works on what and why? The DHS Act clearly defines all these............Eduardo Aguirre and Asa Huchison (as well as Prakash Khatri, to be fair), are on the same level, leading separate agencies. OR ARE THEY? CIS is supposed to be doing adjudications and ICE to find the bad apples, I think, and this is what the LA Times, NYT, GAO, GovExec, Washington Post are saying.
Originally posted by cinta
When it comes to immigration, it is better to follow a bipartisan approach in the sense that all are responsible and accountable:
1: IIRA, one of the harshest recent INA amendments was passed under President Clinton. This is being used today to find and expel about 400,000 despondents using our fee money.
2: AC-21 originated under the Democrats? is still not enacted as a law. Full of loopholes and flawed.
3: PERM is not good for future LC applicants. President Bush and Ashcroft...
.....
Originally posted by waytoolong
Good point - bipartisan is better ...
the reason NYT is making this an issue in an election year is they are pretty left leaning ... I thought they will be willing to publish some of the emails especially if it gels with their agenda.