Natz Denial and filing of appeal-any one through this

Hind sight is 20/20

Please read my messages again in light of above phrase that "hind sight is 20/20". How many people knew that before 1998, the I-751 approved after divorce was perfecatly legal. If I acted on that assumption, five years ago, in 2003, what did I do wrong?

Now, all posters are in year 2008 and know better. how many of you guys honestly tell me that "You" knew in 2003 that approval after divorce was illegal "for sure" and backed that up with a legal precedence. May not be a single one of you. So, If I did not knew back than, it was OK.

Moreover, one of the reason I started this thread by discussing this issue here in public forum was of PUBLIC SERVICE. May be if one more person can be educated on this issue and saves his/her green card, than I have done my job. Cheers.
 
The public service will be when you come back to report the eventual outcome of your case. Right now all we have is armchair speculation.
 
Oath Ceremony on October 2, 2009

boatbod said:
The public service will be when you come back to report the eventual outcome of your case. Right now all we have is armchair speculation.
Click to expand...


See my post from Sept 2008 till today below. How sweet it is that I have an oath scheduled on Oct 2. Yes, there is a ray at the end of tunnel, that tunnel may be three year long. I finally defeated CIS and got my oath letter. they gave up the fight when I was just warming up. Good Luck to all other. Stay the course (George Bush).
 
smali said:
See my post from Sept 2008 till today below. How sweet it is that I have an oath scheduled on Oct 2. Yes, there is a ray at the end of tunnel, that tunnel may be three year long. I finally defeated CIS and got my oath letter. they gave up the fight when I was just warming up. Good Luck to all other. Stay the course (George Bush).
Click to expand...


Boy, you are something...:eek: I am glad to see other G.W Bushes out there...:rolleyes: Congratulations on defeating USCIS, the best part is that you did this while still warming up, I wonder what you could have done while you were all warmed up and oiled up to the cojones...::cool: I am certain there will be no USCIS after you were done with them...;)
 
Please read downside up on this thread

Thanks for all the good wishes of every one. Especially Publicas thread helped. I sincerely thank LazyCIS. In my case it was frustrating slowness of the CIS which put me behind. Well, after filing nuemrous complaints and a federal law suit, I got the letter. I had always beleived that I was right and they were wrong, but who listens.

I tell you this. This is all a vicious circle created by the bureaucracy which is unnecessarily hurting innocent people. Mya be I shall joint ACLU or someother public service group. I will certainly do that. Thanks again for every one's time.
 
But now I have a natz oath on Oct 2. and US ppt on Oct 3.

Homo.Erectus said:
You weren't denied because your I-751 is pending. You were denied because you're out of status. Your pending I-751 has no relavance to your N-400. Your GC (or Permanent Resident status) was terminated in Jan 2008 which means you're out of status since Jan 2008. Pending/approved I-751 does not and will NOT change that. Being out of status makes you ineligible for citizenship.

Cheers.
Click to expand...


What do you say about my being out of status and I-751 has nothing to do with natz. It was I-751 which did the magic and I got oath. Cheers to you too Homo.
 
smali said:
See my post from Sept 2008 till today below. How sweet it is that I have an oath scheduled on Oct 2. Yes, there is a ray at the end of tunnel, that tunnel may be three year long. I finally defeated CIS and got my oath letter. they gave up the fight when I was just warming up. Good Luck to all other. Stay the course (George Bush).
Click to expand...

You deserve it! Congratulations!
 
Belated congrats and question

belated congrats smali...I just have 1 question, when they initially denied your N400, was it denied at the interview or did you get denial by mail? If at the interview, what did the officer ask you exactly?

This seems like a very long fight, what I also don't get is that you filed N400 based on 5 years (as you had divorce), they rarely ask about your I751 in this case. I751 is mostly checked when you file on 3 year based joined marriage.

I am actually applying for NATZ soon. I am divorced but I mentioned all of that in my I751 and proved that my marriage is bona fide. I am just wondering if the officers will go over my I751 and ask me to show the proof of good marriage again (hence I have to gather all my papers back), so your answers to my question will help me understand what they check for again in my I751 and whether that's prior to interview or at the interview.

Thanks
 
smali hasn't visited this site for over 3 months, so don't expect an answer from him.

To answer your question, denial are sent by mail, not handed out at interview. The IO can still question aspects of your previous marriage(s) even if you are applying based on 5 year rule.
 
laughter_man said:
Could you please answer my questions?
Click to expand...

Thanks for your answer. My question to him was: did they even interview him or they just sent him denial by mail and did not schedule an interview to begin with?

Shouldn't the officers have listened to his story rather than rejecting it at the interview?

So the question mainly is, did they reject him without an interview?
 
laughter_man said:
Thanks for your answer. My question to him was: did they even interview him or they just sent him denial by mail and did not schedule an interview to begin with?

Shouldn't the officers have listened to his story rather than rejecting it at the interview?

So the question mainly is, did they reject him without an interview?
Click to expand...
They interviewed him first and then sent denial. You can't be denied without first being interviewed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top