andrea4prez
Registered Users (C)
i came back april 2004...the lawyer here in cali was the one who told me to submit by march...i learned my lesson when i got denied now i reapplied because ive been here since april 2004 with the longest break of 31 days last 2005....
i was relating my story to musashi to show him what happened to me and what paperwork they told me to submit...he might need it to..from what i understand this is his 2nd time to file too! thanks!
i was relating my story to musashi to show him what happened to me and what paperwork they told me to submit...he might need it to..from what i understand this is his 2nd time to file too! thanks!
With a PD of 3/2008 it was still before 4 years + 1 day. Also when you were interviewed would have no bearing in your case. What was relevant were the dates of your last break in CR 5/2003 and 4/2004(when you resumed CR) and your PD 2/2008 or 3/2008. Also when an applicant files a N-400, the date signed on the form and PD are carved in stone even if it takes them 12 months to make a decision on the case from PD to denial. So if you did not qualify at filing then it makes no difference if they make a decision 12 months after filing. Hence the decision is based on all the eligibility requirement at filing.
If your PD was before the 4 years + 1 day and you could not prove the ties to the US they would have always denied your case.
So please give the exact date of your return after the 9 months travel(2003-2004). Is it FEb/2004, March/2004 or April/2004 that you returned for good?
Many people are in a similar situation hence accurate info will go a long way in assisting everyone.
Thanks and good luck in the most recent N-400 application.