Mele do you know more about DV statistic per Region?i mean chances of winning and chances of getting visa?
The fact that it is not in summons and complaint does not mean they are not saying that.
For instance, we all know that 2+2 = 4 and 3+3=6.
Let's assume plaintiffs are saying 2=3 in the summons.
Would it be correct to say plaintiffs are also saying 6=4?
What you are saying is No, because that is not in the summons.
What I am saying is Yes, because if 2=3, and 2+2=4, then we substitute 2 by 3 in 2+2=4 and get 3+3=4, but we know that 3+3=6, so we substitute 3+3 by 6 and get 6=4. So, if they are saying 2=3 then they are definitely saying 6=4
Finally it looks like you do not understand the law has certain sense. You are trying to apply certain procedures (defined in Supreme Court cases) to certain laws without understanding their sense.
What happens if what they are saying contradict common sense?If they are saying what is not in the complaint then they have to amend the complaint to include what they are saying before whatever they are saying will be considered and also in their briefs/memo.
Elaborate more on that.In law 2+2 is not always equal to 4.
I have never been involved into litigation and really absolutely new to it. However, you statement is too strong to be correct.You have shown that you do not understand the law and how the law works.
Basically, when you are looking at the results of one selection you cannot say whether they are random or not. Results cannot be random or non-random.I will learn from the statistician/ mathetician than to pretend I know
What happens if what they are saying contradict common sense?
Elaborate more on that.
I have never been involved into litigation and really absolutely new to it. However, you statement is too strong to be correct.
I hope you have not taken offense. Anyway, all the best in everything that you do.
Basically, when you are looking at the results of one selection you cannot say whether they are random or not. Results cannot be random or non-random.
Algorithm, what is the way you obtain selection, could be random or non-random. And the results could be called random if they are obtained by a single run of a random algorithm.
In order to figure out whether algorithm is random or not you need to apply the algorithm a lot of times (maybe a million or so; the more times you apply, the more presice is the answer) and measure how many times this particular entry was selected. So, you calculate the frequences of each entry to be selected. They you apply a statistical test to figure out whether the frequencies are close enough. If the test is satisfied, the algorithm is random. As I said before, the more times you run the algorithm upon testing, the more accurate the tolerance is,
This statistical test is what they were supposed to do on testing/debugging stage to double check the algorithm is random.
Lol nothing will happen and nothing will happen with 98% of people on this forum when they realize they have not been selected in two weeks time. You're all wasting your time discussing this pointless topic on these forums, just sit and wait impatient people.
U2 is probably wasting ur time with d above point of urs which is basically pointless. Diz thread has been educative, informative, entertaining & full of enlightenment. No knowledge they say is lost. I don’t see anything wrong in discussing potential issues so to say .
Of course, hu cares if not selected!!No1 here is standing sure of his/herself being selected! Its just a hopeful thing....Life goes on....
U shd probably wish ur veryself (ur) 98% failure & not those on this forum.....spoiled brat
LoveAmerica in all your threads here i still can get your point?are you saying the house is disscusing pointless topics or issues?then why are you here?cos i can see that you dont have any business to do here.If you re not ready to be educative/infomative and entertain then get THEE behind this forum.We all are here to learn even though sometimes we argue blindly its part of learning.Sometimes If you dont argue and listen you cant learn.
In my opinion the law suit case is pretty pointless, I never heard somebody suing a government before for residency into a country; especially the United States. Why can't people wait until July 15th? It makes no sense why people can't wait and see the next results, I understand it was sad to hear it was cancelled but these things happen for a reason.