Originally posted by tsnaresh
A0001,
Thanks for your interest.
In nut shell, BCIS is interpreting the degree as a single degree and from single institute. In the law it is NOT defined or mentioned if degree needs to be from single institute or whether the combination of degrees are allowed or not for bachelor's degree equivalency. But BCIS is making its own interpretation. Definitely (I am sure lot of you agree on this) the intension of law
is to verify the bachelor's degree equivalency but doesn't matter if it is a combination of degrees. Even in US, it is common that people transfer courses from one institute to other to get the bachelor's degree. US universities don't mind if we have combination of degrees to meet the bachelor's degree equivalency, myself got admission into MBA with my 3 year degree+2 year computer course. So in my openion BCIS interpretation is not correct and they should accept combination of degrees.
Also, this interpretation is a recent change in their policy. INS used to approve the cases with combination of degrees.
(otherwise our lawyers would not have set this minimum requirement in the labor cert, which we don't even meet the requirement, when we are actually working in that position)
If we file the lawsiut contesting the BCIS interpretation there is high chance that the decision would come in our favor.
In past, bachelor's + 5 years of experience was not considered equal to Master's but the decision was reversed after lawsuit (deciion was in favor of degree + 5 years).
So I think, we have strong reason to contest this interpretation of the degree and if we file the lawsuit, we could get a favourable decision.
Lawsuit would take money and time so for an individual it is difficult to file but if we combine our energies, we can look into feasibility of this approach.
Thanks.