How soon can i send my I-90 ??

But going back to my case... You guys said consult an attorney months ago because it could go either way. So I did.. She said she cant see them deporting me.. if anything I would just get denied and I can either appeal it or re-apply later.. or just stay a PR.

I can only say per laws, it appears that your prior offenses make you deportable. Whether USCIS, if you file for natutralization, will forward you to ICE for deportation or not is a different issue.

It seems your original charge is for possession of marijuna more than 16 onuces. Then it dropped to 4th degree and you were convicted. But 4th degree is
still about more than 2 ounces. The criteria for deportation is 30 miligram.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
But going back to my case... You guys said consult an attorney months ago because it could go either way. So I did.. She said she cant see them deporting me.. if anything I would just get denied and I can either appeal it or re-apply later.. or just stay a PR.
The attorney gave an opinion without showing a solid law or precedent that makes you safe. So all you have is a legal opinion that USCIS may not agree with. In such cases where deportation is on the line, it is advisable to consult 2 or more attorneys if you don't get anything solid that makes you clearly safe or clearly deportable. The law as written makes possession of 30 grams or more a deportable offense, so the attorney should show you something to counteract that if they're going to say with confidence that you won't be deported.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Actually there could a opposite reason for that guy to finally apply when he was already in 60s or even 70s chilkdren are all grown up He is old but still keep important ties with oild country.
In cases where somebody has to lose their original citizenship or lose other rights in their original country if they gain US citizenship, they may decide to apply for US citizenship when they no longer care about those rights. Maybe they have sold off the farm they owned or the business they owned became worthless, or they hardly visit anymore so they don't care if they would need a visa to visit.

But in cases where they don't have to give up any rights like that when they obtain US citizenship, you're right that it could be the opposite reason why they eventually apply -- they have strengthened their ties to their original country, and want to go back to live there indefinitely without losing the option to return to the US, or they don't mind being deported back there.
 
I can only say per laws, it appears that your prior offenses make you deportable. Whether USCIS, if you file for natutralization, will forward you to ICE for deportation or not is a different issue.

It seems your original charge is for possession of marijuna more than 16 onuces. Then it dropped to 4th degree and you were convicted. But 4th degree is
still about more than 2 ounces. The criteria for deportation is 30 miligram.

The attorney gave an opinion without showing a solid law or precedent that makes you safe. So all you have is a legal opinion that USCIS may not agree with. In such cases where deportation is on the line, it is advisable to consult 2 or more attorneys if you don't get anything solid that makes you clearly safe or clearly deportable. The law as written makes possession of 30 grams or more a deportable offense, so the attorney should show you something to counteract that if they're going to say with confidence that you won't be deported.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lopez_v._Gonzales

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/1101.html

You guys keep talking about INA ...... under INA law .... 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B)

(43) The term “aggravated felony” means—

(B) illicit trafficking in a controlled substance (as defined in section 802 of title 21), including a drug trafficking crime (as defined in section 924 (c) of title 18);
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lopez_v._Gonzales

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/1101.html

You guys keep talking about INA ...... under INA law .... 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B)

(43) The term “aggravated felony” means—

(B) illicit trafficking in a controlled substance (as defined in section 802 of title 21), including a drug trafficking crime (as defined in section 924 (c) of title 18);

Aggravated felony is not only criteria for deportation on crminal ground. Deportation on crminal gounrds include but not limited to the follwing situation
(1) conviction of aggravated felony, which also serves a permanent bar to citizenship even if deportation get wavered or canceled by court
(2) conviction of crime of moral turpitude whose senetnces is one year or longer.
(3) conviction of specific crime like controlled substance withe exception of single posesssion of less than 30 grams of marijunra, certain domestic violence and certain types of firearm offense
regardless of sentence or degree of crime (misdemeanor or felony)

An offense can meet all of above or only one above. But meeting only one of teh above is enmough for deportation. A drug trafficking I beleive meet all above three stanmdard for deportation is absolutely hopeless. But posesssion of marijuna more than 30 grams may only meet (3) but still is deportable. In your case, what applies is (3). They are all listed under INA 237.

However it does not mean it is hopeless. Drug traffiking is hopeless but posesstion of marijuna for self use can hopefully avoid deportation. But your lawyer simply saying you will be fine, in my opinion, is wrong.
 
Aggravated felony is not only criteria for deportation on crminal ground. Deportation on crminal gounrds include but not limited to the follwing situation
(1) conviction of aggravated felony, which also serves a permanent bar to citizenship even if deportation get wavered or canceled by court
(2) conviction of crime of moral turpitude whose senetnces is one year or longer.
(3) conviction of specific crime like controlled substance withe exception of single posesssion of less than 30 grams of marijunra, certain domestic violence and certain types of firearm offense
regardless of sentence or degree of crime (misdemeanor or felony)

However it does not mean it is hopeless. Drug traffiking is hopeless but posesstion of marijuna for self use can hopefully avoid deportation. But your lawyer simply saying you will be fine, in my opinion, is wrong.


links please ... she didnt say that they couldnt put me in the process of deportation ... she said the actual removal of me from the usa to my home country. She said the most they can really do is deny me naturalization....Stop nick picking everything I say. No disrespect.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, you've already convinced yourself that they're not going to deport you. So go ahead and apply, it's you who will suffer if they deport you, not us.
 
links please ... she didnt say that they couldnt put me in the process of deportation ... she said the actual removal of me from the usa to my home country. She said the most they can really do is deny me naturalization....Stop nick picking everything I say. No disrespect.

The link is right here

http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-29/0-0-0-5667.html

Read section (a)(2)(B)

(B) Controlled substances.-

(i) Conviction.-Any alien who at any time after admission has been convicted of a violation of (or a conspiracy or attempt to violate) any law or regulation of a State, the United States, or a foreign country relating to a controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802)), other than a single offense involving possession for one's own use of 30 grams or less of marijuana, is deportable.


section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802)),
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/21/usc_sec_21_00000802----000-.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, you've already convinced yourself that they're not going to deport you. So go ahead and apply, it's you who will suffer if they deport you, not us.

Now you're twisting my words, Im convinced that if I apply there is chance that they will send me to deportation proceedings.. and if they do, i get a chance to appeal.. Look I understand this is a serious matter. Otherwise I wouldn't be on this board reading your none-legal legal advise. It is indeed something that can go either way.. I understand that the amount of Marijuana is alot, I did speak to a diffrent lawyer today someone well respected by the Hispanic community by being on a TV show once per week.. I figured I had nothing to lose except the $80 for the cosultation. He said that my case is very serious.. He said I should try getting the marijuana charge re-opened and maybe dropped down or maybe dismissed. he said that the amount of weed could make a key turn in the IO's point of view as well as the 3 year probation sentence.(Which i am prepared to face, but why give them the apportunity??? ) He said probation is viewed equivalent to jail time. So .................. going back to the original lawyer who said "the most they can do is deny me" I have to wait til she gets back to me. She is married to a local Judge, her secretary said they might be able to pull strings. IDK. but I will have to diclose the case on N-400. So will see what happens i guess .. Thanks for the tough advise Guys or Gals..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Now you're twisting my words, Im convinced that if I apply there is chance that they will send me to deportation proceedings.. and if they do, i get a chance to appeal.. Look I understand this is a serious matter. Otherwise I wouldn't be on this board reading your none-legal legal advise. It is indeed something that can go either way.. I understand that the amount of Marijuana is alot, I did speak to a diffrent lawyer today someone well respected by the Hispanic community by being on a TV show once per week.. I figured I had nothing to lose except the $80 for the cosultation. He said that my case is very serious.. He said I should try getting the marijuana charge re-opened and maybe dropped down or maybe dismissed. he said that the amount of weed could make a key turn in the IO's point of view as well as the 3 year probation sentence.(Which i am prepared to face, but why give them the apportunity??? ) He said probation is viewed equivalent to jail time. So .................. going back to the original lawyer who said "the most they can do is deny me" I have to wait til she gets back to me. She is married to a local Judge, her secretary said they might be able to pull strings. IDK. but I will have to diclose the case on N-400. So will see what happens i guess .. Thanks for the tough advise Guys or Gals..

This is fair self-appraisal of your case. The key is to make informed choices, then hoping for the best but
get ready for the worst.
 
One factor in getting the old conviction successfully reopened is whether you pleaded guilty and were informed by the judge or defense attorney of the immigration consequences of pleading guilty. Some people have gotten the guilty pleas undone by showing that they weren't informed of the immigration consequences. When that happens, it doesn't mean you are automatically safe; the prosecutor still has the right to pursue a trial with you pleading Not Guilty. But if it's an old case for a minor crime the prosecutor often just decides to drop it.
 
MMM kay soo. Now I spoke to a few Lawyers in the Area of the arrest (Westchester County) NY.. One said that EXPUNGEMENT is not an Option in the state of NY.. so that went out the window pretty fast. Another option is getting some kind of "Pardon" or "executive clemency". But this would only help me if was looking for a job or something and I had to disclosed of a charge on an application. At last he said that reopening my case that i pleaded guilty to under oath with a court appointed lawyer is almost impossible. But he is not 100% sure.. Then he recomended me comming into the office to see him for $40. ( Bar Association Fee for 1/2 hr )

Another Lawyer said that with the kind of charge I have and since it was already lowered and from 99, They probably wont reopen the case at all.. he even told me he doesnt wanna take my money.. then he refferred me to an immigration lawyer he knows better, This one used to work for USCIS. Now I gotta fax a copy of a court disposition. Im gonna send it tomorrow thursday .We'll see what happens (This one is all free). My question is how can I prove that I was not advised of deportation proceedings if I take a guilty plea? And If I was charged as a Youthful Offender, shouldn't it say on the disposition "YO status" somewhere??.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
MMM kay soo. Now I spoke to a few Lawyers in the Area of the arrest (Westchester County) NY.. One said that EXPUNGEMENT is not an Option in the state of NY..
Even if you got it expunged, expungement doesn't matter for immigration purposes.

At last he said that reopening my case that i pleaded guilty to under oath with a court appointed lawyer is almost impossible.
In general it is almost impossible, but where immigrants are involved and neither the judge nor lawyer informed the defendant of the immigration consequences, it has been done in a number of cases.

My question is how can I prove that I was not advised of deportation proceedings if I take a guilty plea?
I'm not sure ... but these days they normally put a statement in the plea paperwork (or court transcript, if the judge verbally told you) saying that you are aware of possible "immigration consequences" (they don't have to use the word "deportation") of pleading guilty. So I figure your approach would be to assert that you were not told of the immigration consequences, and show that nothing in the court paperwork or transcript shows that you were told.

If I were you I would forget about naturalization, and would just apply for renewal. Then if they deny the renewal, step it up and pursue avenues to get the case reopened. Rather than reopening the case ahead of time, I would treat reopening as a last resort after the renewal application, because you'll probably lose if it went to trial, which could land you in prison with a felony.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wonder How much this would help me ..http://forums.immigration.com/showt...forme-their-clients-of-immigration-consequnce

im gonna speak to a lawyer this week comming up ...
1 - I was finallly able to get a court disposition for my first charge: YouthFul Offender/Grand larceny / class a misdemeanor. >>> case was dismissed

2 - Link above is infact something that applies to my second case .. I was never informed of immigration concequenses if taking a guilty plea..

I pleaded guilty to possesion or marijuana, also a misdemeanor. The killer is that it was over 30mg , I have to find a way to change that or find out how USCIS would see a 1st and only possesion charge / while adjudicated as a Youthful Offender.

3 - Otherwise Imm gonna have to do what jacko said : do I-90 and wait it out .. maybe there will be laws changed in my favor.
 
Update - I have been in touch with well lets just say many lawyers.. they are all giving me somewhat the same answer. The answer is that YOUTHFUL OFFENDER ADJUDICATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE "CONVICTION" FOR A CRIME UNDER THE INA

So what I decided to do was go an extra step and look for support groups in NYC. I found http://www.familiesforfreedom.org/, and http://www.immigrantdefenseproject.org/ .
Both very helpful I spend alot of time on the phone with them giving them details of my case. We concluded that I have both dispositions from the 2 charges I have ..

On the first one (burglary) it clearly says Charged as Youthful Offender. And case dismissed after a 6 month adjournment.

On the 2nd (possesion of marijuana 4th / over 30mg) charge It doesnt say Youthful Offended . --- So I called the Town Court today and spoke to Supervisor and just told her that there is a clerical error on my last disposition. I told her that I have proof that i was tried as a youthful offender. She said no problem come into their office and I can pick up a corrected disposition stating the defendant (me) as Youthful offender on it.


So whats does this mean for me? am I in good standings now that I know 100% both charges were adjuticated as youthful offender.
Am I gonna submit my N-400 ? Probably not yet. I still want to see where this whole Padilla vs Kentuky is going to go with the thousands of cases that are now in question including mine.

http://www.nilc.org/immlawpolicy/removcrim/removcrim046.htm

any suggestions anyone??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
On september of last year I came in USA under Diversity Lottery Program. I received my green card a month later and have notice that one of my first name is missing(exemple:JEAN instead of
JEAN ROBERT), obviously ROBERT is missing. I received my SSN(social security number) with the right first name JEAN ROBERT as mentioned on my birth certificate.

I have also noticed that my canadian passport (where my my green card visa was issued) missed also ROBERT. I immediately took an appoitment with the nearest canadian embassy to correct it and they did after checking my birth certificate and other relevant documents: they said all my canadian documents have all my first name correctly written (JEAN ROBERT) and the agent who issued my canadian passport 3 years before forgot ROBERT. Now I have a new canadian passport with the corrected first name JEAN ROBERT .

I am determine to have my green card replaced so I don`t know if I have to pay the fee $450 when filling the I-90 form? and how can I explain my case to the USCIS in order to have my GC replaced ?
I deeply need your help. Thanks in advance.........
 
On september of last year I came in USA under Diversity Lottery Program. I received my green card a month later and have notice that one of my first name is missing(exemple:JEAN instead of
JEAN ROBERT), obviously ROBERT is missing. I received my SSN(social security number) with the right first name JEAN ROBERT as mentioned on my birth certificate.

I have also noticed that my canadian passport (where my my green card visa was issued) missed also ROBERT. I immediately took an appoitment with the nearest canadian embassy to correct it and they did after checking my birth certificate and other relevant documents: they said all my canadian documents have all my first name correctly written (JEAN ROBERT) and the agent who issued my canadian passport 3 years before forgot ROBERT. Now I have a new canadian passport with the corrected first name JEAN ROBERT .

I am determine to have my green card replaced so I don`t know if I have to pay the fee $450 when filling the I-90 form? and how can I explain my case to the USCIS in order to have my GC replaced ?
I deeply need your help. Thanks in advance.........

In the US, what you consider to be your first name "JEAN ROBERT" will be treated as first name "JEAN" and middle name "ROBERT" because they're two separate words which aren't connected by a hyphen (e.g. JEAN-ROBERT). On the green card, the middle name is usually replaced by the middle initial or omitted altogether, so that's why you don't see the "ROBERT" on the green card; they put your first name "JEAN" but omitted what they consider to be your middle name "ROBERT".

Even on your Social Security card where you see "JEAN ROBERT LASTNAME", you might think they have your first name as "JEAN ROBERT", but it's almost certainly stored as first name "JEAN" and middle name "ROBERT" in their system.

Don't waste your time and money trying to get the green card changed. It takes months to get a replacement card, they probably will demand the fee before changing it*. If you leave the card as is you will have no problems with travel or employment or DMV or anywhere else that you need to show the green card to prove your status.


*if you don't file I-90 for an error correction soon after receiving the green card (like within 1 or 2 months), they treat that as you agreeing to the correctness of the green card, and will usually refuse to change it unless you pay the fee.
 
How soon one must apply for I-90 if his Green Card is lost in mail?

How soon one must apply for I-90 if his Green Card is lost in mail and USCIS has not received the mail from post office also?
 
Top