Having more than one PR?

[Participant]

I understand your reasoning, but it is wrong. The issue is not about havng the right to reside somewhere. The issue is having the obligation to reside somewhere. As a US permanent resident, you absolutely have to reside in the US. You not only have the right to reside in the US, but the obligation to do so. Now, CIS and any other government agency does not know nor care that permanent residency in some other countries does not require to live there. That's foreign law, which can change without the US authorities knowing, and US authorities can not base their decisions on whatever some government from some other country decided.
For US authorities, the term "permanent resident" means an obligation to reside in the country. So, if you are a US PR and a PR of some other country, the US assumes and has to assume that you have to reside there. And that automatically means that you can't reside in the US.
The US can not use any other country's definition of "permanent residence."

From your above postings,it seems,given to understand,inessence:
'That If an US PR and also ( even just) has PR of another country,CIs will construe that he will likely not be permanent resident of US and has full risk of losing GC.
And it is balnket kinda of thing with out exceptions.'
Let us see an hypothetical case to be more clear.
Person A is an USPR.Before that he merely holds PR of 'X' Country and he is a Citizen of 'Y' country.
Upon his status is adjusted to PR,he has:
1)Resided continuously in US and never gone out of US for even one day(say till now for five years).
2)He had a house in US right from the day he was adjusted as PR.
3)He is earning a salary and never was a charge on public funds.
4)He submitted tax returns to IRS every year.
5)he abided all the laws and never had slightest deviation.
Now only thing is he has also a PR of another contry.
From the blanket statements of having another PR etal..,he is at risk??
because he merely has PR of another country?
if not how far it is true or has legal standing?

 

[rgeneblazo]

Very interesting and very very intellegent discussions. Keep up the good posts guys! Thanks.

 

[pralay]

From the blanket statements of having another PR etal..,he is at risk??
because he merely has PR of another country?

Yes, he is at risk, but risk automatically/always does not transform to loosing US PR status. And the magnitude of risk also varies person to person. If someone never travelled/entered to 'X' country or did not put any effort to keep the PR status of 'X' country alive/extending after getting US PR, probably his risk is very very minimal. But on the other hand for certain person, the risk could be high - if he travelled in X country as PR and lived there for while as PR (after getting US PR).

 

[FunnyWait]

Our trolls are back. Interesting to see that both were gone for the same timeframe. That is a strong indication that they are either the same person or a couple.
I have a strong suspicion that one or both of them, before they left, repeatedly tried to hack into my account. According to the admin, a warning was issued, but it seems they want to continue their immature behavior.
Since I have the IP address from where this attempt to hack into my account originated, I am going to inform their employer the next time. The DMCA is a strong weapon...

Admin/Moderator (not volunteer moderators),

JoeF has made a personal attack again on me and without my posting anything against him in the last few days. I hope a strong action is taken against this. I had not posted anything in this thread prior to this post and he still wrote about me.

Also he has been accusing me of hacking his account. I neither did that nor I have any time for doing that. This is his attempt to badmouth me by using dirty tricks and using this forum.

I certainly expect you guys to tell JoeF to stop this personal attack and baseless allegation of hacking his account. I hope this time an unbiased action will be taken to inform JoeF of his misdeeds.

 

[rgeneblazo]

Admin/Moderator (not volunteer moderators),

JoeF has made a personal attack again on me and without my posting anything against him in the last few days. I hope a strong action is taken against this. I had not posted anything in this thread prior to this post and he still wrote about me.

Also he has been accusing me of hacking his account. I neither did that nor I have any time for doing that. This is his attempt to badmouth me by using dirty tricks and using this forum.

I certainly expect you guys to tell JoeF to stop this personal attack and baseless allegation of hacking his account. I hope this time an unbiased action will be taken to inform JoeF of his misdeeds.

IMHO, the Unrelated Thread Subforum is the best place for this complaint.

 

[qwerty987666]

IMHO, the Unrelated Thread Subforum is the best place for this complaint.

Such a thoughful response

Just curious... Where were your wise mind wondering when you called JoeF BS posts as "interesting and very very intellegent discussions" on this same thread??

 

[ar888]

Why JoeF has been given any IP address ?? Please posts JoeF IP address on this forum for all.

Nobody was given IP addresses of others. When somebody tries to hack in to another account, an automatic notification will be sent to the member with the IP address, from which an unsuccessful attempt has been made.

 

[qwerty987666]

Nobody was given IP addresses of others. When somebody tries to hack in to another account, an automatic notification will be sent to the member with the IP address, from which an unsuccessful attempt has been made.

Thanx for clarification. "hack" is too extreme word for such actions, these are just unsuccessful logins . And I have strong doubt that JoeF himself is doing such failed logins, to fake this so called "HACKING"., Its just LOOSERS fanatic attempt to gain some sympathy on this forum. But failed as always. JoeF get LOST now...BANG

 

[Participant]

If a person is a Canadian Landed Immigrant before becoming a US PR, and is essentially not using the Canadian status once the person is a US PR, e.g., by using the US GC to travel to and from Canada, the risk is significantly reduced. There is still a risk, but it becomes much easier to argue it away. Of course, in this example, giving up the Canadian status reduces the risk to 0.

yes,my point is to bring out-- risk may be there(always risks will be there even every day life some way..for every thing and it doesn't mean we will put hold on our lives)but calculated risks(which are not illegal) categorizing in to minor may be not that dangerous and Just holding another PR in this or similar contexts possibly doesn't thwart the right to have USPR in just a BLANKET manner.

 

[qwerty987666]

yes,my point is to bring out-- risk may be there(always risks will be there even every day life some way..for every thing and it doesn't mean we will put hold on our lives)but calculated risks(which are not illegal) categorizing in to minor may be not that dangerous and Just holding another PR in this or similar contexts possibly doesn't thwart the right to have USPR in just a BLANKET manner.

Well said. I second that.