H1 Appeal Status

sevenhills

Registered Users (C)
My H1 transfer got denied, because of insufficient doc on exp. Lately my lawer appealed with exp letters. Its in appeal stage and has gone to Commissioner.

Here is my question.

1. My previous H-1 & I-94 is still valid
2. If appeal is in progress, can I stay? and how long?
3. Is it illegal to stay if denied?

Help me Gurus.
 
INCORRECT.

The appeal does NOT keep you in lawful status while the appeal is adjudicated. Speak to your attorney immediately.
 
Thanks Jaxen & James for the reply,

I did check with few lawers. They said Its legal to stay while Appeal is in progress, as long as we reply within 30 days of denial. I just want others opinion from users of "Immigration Portal".

Same employer filed new H1 with proper documentation & exp letters. They got approved. Old I-94 is still valid. I am thinking of going to India and stamp with new H1 latter in three months. During this period I want to make sure, I am in legal status, also hoping that current appeal will get approved. Because my case clear.

Can you pl make sure about this? Thanks all for your feedback.
 
Once the EOS or COS is denied the tolling of unlawful presence ceases. There is no administrative appeal of the denial of an EOS or COS. 8 C.F.R § 214.1(c)(5); 248.3(g). The appeal is of the denial of the H-1B petition only.

This means that an appeal. if approved, will restore H-1 status but it will not have the effect of providing an extension since the extension is not appealable. As long as your previous I-94 is valid, you are in status. However, you probably should not be working for the new employer as the transfer has been denied and if the old company cancelled your previous visa, then you need an extension and therefore you are out of status and my answer stands. Also, since you are not working for the sponsor of your previous H-1, you are not properly maintaining your status and you may have problems. Again, this is a very difficult situation to clearly explain in this forum and my recommendation that you speak to your attorney was intended to avoid the need for this more extended discussion of your situation (which is still somewhat incomplete).

Another of the ambiguities created by AC21.
 
Top