njiang46 said:My husband filed the I-130 for me, so I'm the beneficiary for that. Is this the same thing you talked about?
http://experts.about.com/q/Immigration-Issues-344/index.htm
njiang46 said:My husband filed the I-130 for me, so I'm the beneficiary for that. Is this the same thing you talked about?
pianoplayer said:an OPT-based EAD is no longer strictly valid.
TheRealCanadian said:Is it "loosely valid", or "sort of valid"? Employment authorization validity is like pregnancy; either it's valid or it's not. Your unsubstantiated assertions are the only claims that OPT terminates automatically upon I-485 filing.
pianoplayer said:When an OPT student files AOS, his/her status changes to AOS pending. Since the EAD was derived from the student's OPT, it is no longer valid. The ex-student needs to apply for a new EAD based on AOS.
YOUR unsubstantiated assertions are the only claims that OPT does not terminate upon I485 filing.
They're not denied because for family based AOS applications, USCIS forgive any illegal work. Its part of the INA that they must do this.TheRealCanadian said:I'm not making an unsubstantiated assertion - you are. If what you claim is true, then FB applicants who filed their I-485 while in OPT and worked for even a single day after their I-485 was filed would be regularly denied. They're not.
TheRealCanadian said:Not at all; they apply for the EAD based on a category of eligibility, like OPT. If they gain another category of eligibility based on the I-485, then that doesn't invalidate the EAD, since they're still eligible for an EAD in general. EADs are no more linked to an indvidual status than they are to a particular petition.
I'm not making an unsubstantiated assertion - you are. If what you claim is true, then FB applicants who filed their I-485 while in OPT and worked for even a single day after their I-485 was filed would be regularly denied. They're not.