Hi Nilram,Hi I am also an OC2** and submitted my ds260 in June. So far I have not heard from KCC
Can I ask when did you submit your ds260?
Thanks
I submitted my ds260 on about May 20. So yeah, it took about 5 months..
Hi Nilram,Hi I am also an OC2** and submitted my ds260 in June. So far I have not heard from KCC
Can I ask when did you submit your ds260?
Thanks
EXCELLENT . Hopefully things are moving nowHi guys,
Just wanted to let you guys know.....a family friend got an interview for December first week at the Suva embassy.....and the case no# is somewhat around 400's...she is not aware of this forum so I thought I would just let you guys know......
Im not sure. @Britsimon could you shed some light on this?Hello!
CN OC202218XX
Married
DS-260 submitted May 20th
Request to unlock Oct 5th (need to update something in the security check section)
Documents Requested by KCC Oct 22nd
I know I’ve seen this question asked on a forum before but scrolling and can’t find it again for the life of me! So sorry to ask the same question, but should we wait for the DS-260 to be unlocked first before sending our documents AND (in a normal year) do you need to wait for another document request email after an unlock request?
Thanks
You're meant to get 33 instead of 35. I submitted my documents with 35 though and my documents were approved and I am just going to take my 33 that only just arrived to my actual interview when I get it.
I haven't heard of anyone having their 35 rejected by KCC, but it is the wrong one.
The instructions for selectees direct you to refer to the reciprocity pages for which civil documents to get. That page for Australia, under police certificates, saysAre you sure this is correct? When applying for the AFP check, the description for 33 says "Immigration/Citizenship - for supply to the department of home affairs" where as 35 says "Overseas Visa - Supply to a country other than Australia". Based on the descriptions, I would have thought 35 was the correct certificate, as 33 seems to be for Australian Immigration/Citizenship purposes.
I submitted my documents with 35 so just wasn't to be sure that I need to get a new one.
thanks
Yeah like Susie said above, 33 is the correct one. It is very confusing because of the description, I think at least 50% of us ordered code 35 the first time because of the exact reasoning you had. But hopefully everyone that made that mistake still gets document qualified like I did. Just going to take my 33 (which I now have) to my interview rather than resubmitting my documents based on feedback from others here.Are you sure this is correct? When applying for the AFP check, the description for 33 says "Immigration/Citizenship - for supply to the department of home affairs" where as 35 says "Overseas Visa - Supply to a country other than Australia". Based on the descriptions, I would have thought 35 was the correct certificate, as 33 seems to be for Australian Immigration/Citizenship purposes.
I submitted my documents with 35 so just wasn't to be sure that I need to get a new one.
thanks
Yeah like Susie said above, 33 is the correct one. It is very confusing because of the description, I think at least 50% of us ordered code 35 the first time because of the exact reasoning you had. But hopefully everyone that made that mistake still gets document qualified like I did. Just going to take my 33 (which I now have) to my interview rather than resubmitting my documents based on feedback from others here.
From what you and others have posted, I get the impression KCC does not do an in-depth check for every document from every country, and that if it looks like an applicant has (for example) a valid PCC on the face of it they check it as DQ. Of course, the consulate will require the correct one.Yeah like Susie said above, 33 is the correct one. It is very confusing because of the description, I think at least 50% of us ordered code 35 the first time because of the exact reasoning you had. But hopefully everyone that made that mistake still gets document qualified like I did. Just going to take my 33 (which I now have) to my interview rather than resubmitting my documents based on feedback from others here.
Hi Shezza85,Hey guys so finally got my AFP check Code 33 after waiting about a month and like many here selecting the wrong one Code 35. It found one of my offences from way back in 2009 a low range DUI, in which it got dismissed under a S10. I did not disclose this upon my initial submission of the D260 as I honestly did not think this would be recorded since it was a minor offence. I'm still waiting for my unlock D260 to come back after I emailed over 5 weeks ago. I guess the question I have is:
1. Do I now have to obtain court records for this, despite my charge getting dismissed? I tried to find links on NSW court website to obtain but could not find anything helpful?
2. How much will this hurt my chances since I did not intially disclose this? I have a high CN anyhow but I'd hate to come undone at the final hurdle if i got to the interview stage because of this.
3. Has anyone had issues getting on BritSimons website? I tried to log on to his website before and weirdly it takes me to some pharmacy website for Viagra and Cialis. not sure if his site has been hacked or just issue with my computer.
Hey AusOCH
Hi Shezza85,
Almost the exact same thing happened to me - an old neg driving charge that I didn’t realise was anything beyond a driving record. Although I am very surprised a s10 showed up, how annoying!!
You will need to open and update your ds260 to mark “yes” to have you ever been convicted of a crime, lucky you already have an unlock request in process!
You will need to obtain court records, to do this you contact the local courthouse which you attended - they will either have it onsite or in archives. I no longer live near mine so they were super helpful in posting this to me.
Are you already DQ? As you will need to provide the court record with your docs.
I wouldn’t consider this change in your ds260 to harm you in any more or less than any other corrections/updates to the form would - the ds260 needs to be correct and the consular officer is who decides yes or no on your visa. (And I wouldn’t worry about this harming your chances).
Hi to all the kiwis in this group.Hi Folks,
I'm hoping someone can help me on this one. I have a pretty low Oceania Case number from New Zealand (OC2022000001xx) and have been requested to send documents, which I have done. However, the New Zealand police clearance is a slightly different process. You have to email the Ministry of Justice and ask them to send the details to the USA Consulate, which I thought I had done. It's been a while though and I haven't received anything regarding an interview so I just went back and had a look at the original email (which I had been advised had been processed). I notice that the guidance says to "include your US visa application case number (e.g. ACK2017958275)" on the form, which I now I think I got wrong. The only number I had that looked like that was the number on my DS-260 submission confirmation email beneath the barcode, but should this have been the case number above (OC2022000001xx)? It doesn't look like quite the same format to me... Should it be a different number? If anyone has done this already I'd really appreciate some advice.
Thanks in advance
Hi to all the kiwis in this group.
Reposting this from the 2022 All Selectees Forum.
I went ahead and asked for a standard Criminal Record Check which I was sent back within a week. Are we meant to be asking for the Police Vetting for visa purposes? And if so, do we send it to our embassy where we would have our interview?
These are the official Dept of State instructions:Hi to all the kiwis in this group.
Reposting this from the 2022 All Selectees Forum.
I went ahead and asked for a standard Criminal Record Check which I was sent back within a week. Are we meant to be asking for the Police Vetting for visa purposes? And if so, do we send it to our embassy where we would have our interview?
Hi Bob22,Interesting it has changed and they send it directly to them now. Anyway, the form linked there is definitely the correct form, I remember it clearly. You can put the consulate address on it and the consulate case number.
If it were me - I would pay the $85 to get every form of documentation that is available to be sure you are covered. You do not want to go to interview and them tell you that what you have is not sufficient.@AusOC So I spoke to the NSW local courts and I got a letter which explained my DUI charged and how it was dismissed under S10, will I have to actually obtain court records as they said that due to it being so long ago they'd have to get the records of the Government Records Repository which would cost an additional $85. The letter from the NSW local court explains the charge and how it was dismissed under a Section 10 so surely that would suffice