• Hello Members, This forums is for DV lottery visas only. For other immigration related questions, please go to our forums home page, find the related forum and post it there.

DV 2020 AOS Only

Thanks @Sm1smom. I was following the advice from USCIS form filing tips. I thought the evidence of paperwork I am submitting are attachments.

"If you have any attachments, make sure each attached page has your name and A-Number (if any). You may also number the pages and include the total amount of pages being attached (for example, “page 1 of 11”).

I will submit everything just as plain copies without any notation but then what is considered as attachment and the above advice is for?

Thanks

Well you can hand write those annotations on your documents if you must, compared to the method you previously described
 
Hi Mom,
Lockbox rejected and returned my case due to i-944 for signature. i signed the for. Should i send again as is with signed form. Or should i re file all again with new check and new sesled medical exams ??
plz help mom. thanks inadvace
 
Hi Mom,
Lockbox rejected and returned my case due to i-944 for signature(was not signed).
i signed the form. Should i send again as is with signed form. Or should i re file all again with new check and new sesled medical exams ??
plz help mom.
thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • 6745F00B-A82C-425C-8AD4-4CE14AA586C6.jpeg
    6745F00B-A82C-425C-8AD4-4CE14AA586C6.jpeg
    285.4 KB · Views: 47
Hi Mom,
Lockbox rejected and returned my case due to i-944 for signature(was not signed).
i signed the form. Should i send again as is with signed form. Or should i re file all again with new check and new sesled medical exams ??
plz help mom.
thanks in advance.

You have to re-send everything with the signed I-944. You can tear up the old check and write a new one. You don’t need a new sealed medical report, provided the old one is still less than two months old and will remain so by the time the Chicago Lockbox accepts the new package.
 
Those response from the embassy and the KCC are exactly in alignment with my previous response to you. I can’t tell you the precise option to go with, this will have to be your call of these two options:
A) Take a dive and initiate AOS process, with the hope that when you go for your interview, your FO can work directly with the Embassy to get your KCC file sent to them, because you will not be approved without that case file. Bear in mind this will most likely add some additional delay to your processing time. Or
B) Leave things as they are, hope the EO doesn’t get extended, travel ban gets lifted and the embassy reschedule your cancelled appointment.

Like I previously noted, there are serious complications with waiting until the last minute to initiate a change in process.

Thank you for clarifying this for me. I completely understand that you can't tell me what to do, in the end the decision is up to us, with both options having pros and cons, and I also understand that unfortunately this last minute change has created more complications. No one could of guessed that we would have to change process back when we were scheduled for an interview.

Currently, I am not under the travel ban and would be able to fly to Sydney and back but the chance that the EO could be extended makes me very nervous for our chances of interviewing at the Embassy in time considering that there was about 6 weeks of interviews scheduled before mine.
I am leaning towards the AOS option but I had a few more questions that I was hoping you could help with?
Have you heard of anyone in a similar predicament to me in the past that successfully got their KCC file sent to the FO for approval? (My field office would be Los Angeles)
Also, do you believe there is sufficient time for this process to be completed by end of September? I can send off the $330 check today and organise a medical for this week. I notice the time frames vary on the spreadsheet timeline.

Thank you once again for taking the time to answer. I really appreciate it.
 
I don’t recall telling anyone on this thread in the past which option was safer for them, and I’m not going to do so now either. I merely share the information that I have, provide needed guidance based on what I know and leave everyone to decide on what they consider their best option.
Thanks for your reply. I totally understand, however based on your knowledge and analysis of the current situation, would you say I have time to switch this month? And considering the offices closure, and difficulties to get the medicals, could that cost me running out of status?
 
Is National Benefits Center (NBC) aware of deadline September 30 of DV cases when it comes to scheduling for biometrics appointments?

The NBC is part of USCIS, so what do you think? USCIS is not entertaining in-person service at the moment, so assuming the NBC is unaware of DV deadline, they cannot schedule bio appointments until in-person service resumes anyway.
 
Thank you for clarifying this for me. I completely understand that you can't tell me what to do, in the end the decision is up to us, with both options having pros and cons, and I also understand that unfortunately this last minute change has created more complications. No one could of guessed that we would have to change process back when we were scheduled for an interview.

Currently, I am not under the travel ban and would be able to fly to Sydney and back but the chance that the EO could be extended makes me very nervous for our chances of interviewing at the Embassy in time considering that there was about 6 weeks of interviews scheduled before mine.
I am leaning towards the AOS option but I had a few more questions that I was hoping you could help with?
Have you heard of anyone in a similar predicament to me in the past that successfully got their KCC file sent to the FO for approval? (My field office would be Los Angeles)
Also, do you believe there is sufficient time for this process to be completed by end of September? I can send off the $330 check today and organise a medical for this week. I notice the time frames vary on the spreadsheet timeline.

Thank you once again for taking the time to answer. I really appreciate it.

1. I’ve not read/heard of anyone in the past who changed to AOS after their CP interview was already scheduled, talk-less of anyone who successfully got their KCC file transferred back to their USCIS FO.
2. We’ve had selectees in the past whose CNs became current in September and they successfully completed their AOS process by the end of the FY. Those cases be found on some of the past timeline spreadsheets.
 
Thanks for your reply. I totally understand, however based on your knowledge and analysis of the current situation, would you say I have time to switch this month? And considering the offices closure, and difficulties to get the medicals, could that cost me running out of status?

Please take a look at my responses to another forum member in a similar situation:

That’s the problem with waiting until the last minute to make the switch. Switching works best prior to the KCC file being sent to the embassy for a CP interview.

You can either take a chance now an start then AOS process with the hope that when the embassies reopen you work with them and KCC to retrieve the KCC file and get it re-sent to your FO, or wait out the embassy closure plus immigration entry ban and proceed with CP.

Those response from the embassy and the KCC are exactly in alignment with my previous response to you. I can’t tell you the precise option to go with, this will have to be your call of these two options:
A) Take a dive and initiate AOS process, with the hope that when you go for your interview, your FO can work directly with the Embassy to get your KCC file sent to them, because you will not be approved without that case file. Bear in mind this will most likely add some additional delay to your processing time. Or
B) Leave things as they are, hope the EO doesn’t get extended, travel ban gets lifted and the embassy reschedule your cancelled appointment.

Like I previously noted, there are serious complications with waiting until the last minute to initiate a change in process.

1. I’ve not read/heard of anyone in the past who changed to AOS after their CP interview was already scheduled, talk-less of anyone who successfully got their KCC file transferred back to their USCIS FO.
2. We’ve had selectees in the past whose CNs became current in September and they successfully completed their AOS process by the end of the FY. Those cases be found on some of the past timeline spreadsheets.

You can consider the option of submitting your AOS package without the medical report if you’re unable to complete it in a timely manner to enable you submit your AOS package and have it accepted by USCIS before you go out of status in July, if you decide to go the AOS route. You’ll present the medical report when you go for your AOS interview.

If you go out of status before USCIS accepts your AOS package, you become ineligible to process AOS. If you go out of status after USCIS formally accepts your AOS package, you’ll roll into adjustment pending status - a valid status that prevents you from accruing unauthorized stay while your AOS petition is pending.
 
The NBC is part of USCIS, so what do you think? USCIS is not entertaining in-person service at the moment, so assuming the NBC is unaware of DV deadline, they cannot schedule bio appointments until in-person service resumes anyway.
No, I mean in general when in-person services are available to the public. I took a look at spreadsheet timeline and it seems NBC schedules appointments on a first come, first served basis which can be horrendous for DV cases if they reopen.
People who have their applications received at USCIS lockbox after around February 17 have yet to be scheduled for biometrics after USCIS reopens. I had my application received at USCIS Lockbox on April 6 which means I have to stay in queue for at least one and half month for my biometrics appointment upon reopening of USCIS.
And I used to believe that biometrics is just a parallel work in I-485 processing.
"A definitive response from the FBI regarding the fingerprint clearances is required before the I-485 application can be transferred to the local office for interview."

Really disappointing!!
 
Hey guys,
I informed KCC that I want to switch to AOS and they answered that the interview location was changed from Kiev (my home city) to Adjustment Of Status. Is that all that I need from KCC except for waiting for document reviewal confirmation?
Regarding the payment, I will pay DV administrative fee this week (330$) for me and my wife(660$), but I can't still see on the spreadsheet when I should pay this 1225$x2(wife) fee (AOS process tab) other than I should include the receipt to the package(AOS package tab). When and how this fee should be paid?
 
I'm in the same situation only that in between my wife and I we have 5 bank accounts, extracting statements for all accounts and submitting this information twice, once for my i944 and another time for her i944 will make just our i944 section contain 200+ pages. I'm afraid it will be very off putting for the person having to go through my file.

I'm considering skipping filler pages (i.e. "This page intentionally left blank" and other "fun facts about my account") but then the statements will be incomplete, it will show only up to page 13/15 for instance, not sure if anyone will complain about the missing pages...
I was in the same boat. My husband and I has a total of 5 bank accounts as well and the 12 months worth of bank statements was a huge chunk of our AOS package. Lucky for us our bank statements are only 2-3 pages long. We did skip extraneous pages that only had information about the bank and not our bank account (although there were not that many in our case). I think the IO would understand if you exclude those pages because it's pretty clear where the actual statement starts and ends based on the dates and the consistency between each month's balance. For pages which say "page intentionally left blank", we simply printed it double-sided so the blank page shows up on the reverse side. That said, it's up to you if you feel comfortable excluding the pages or not. I'm just sharing how my husband and I did it.

And yes, while preparing for the AOS package, I felt like my privacy is being violated due to the amount of information that I'm providing. But I guess that's just how it's going to be...
 
Hey guys,
I informed KCC that I want to switch to AOS and they answered that the interview location was changed from Kiev (my home city) to Adjustment Of Status. Is that all that I need from KCC except for waiting for document reviewal confirmation?
Regarding the payment, I will pay DV administrative fee this week (330$) for me and my wife(660$), but I can't still see on the spreadsheet when I should pay this 1225$x2(wife) fee (AOS process tab) other than I should include the receipt to the package(AOS package tab). When and how this fee should be paid?

1. Did you email or phone KCC. If you emailed, the response is all the documented confirmation you need from KCC.
2. You’ve not paid attention to the step by step guidance provided on the AOS process spreadsheet - there’s no such thing as document review as part of the AOS process. KCC does not review documents for AOSers.
3. Another evidence you’ve not paid attention to the AOS process spreadsheet or my previous response to you regarding the two payments (and you actually liked the response by the way to indicate you’ve already see it)

Have you gone through the listed forms that you’ll need to send out to the Chicago Lockbox? That spreadsheet is super easy to understand and follow, it’s been in use by numerous AOSers since 2014! You just need to carefully go through it and follow the listed steps. KCC no longer has any direct role to play in the process, most of the nexts that needs to be taken are in your hands.
 
xxxxxxxxx

So that is clearly not from an official source. You dropped the quote as if it was from USCIS’s website, whereas it is from a business website.

Anyway, it is not 100% correct. The NBC typically doesn’t wait until the background check clears before forwarding case files to the applicable FOs. We’ve had reports of AOSers receiving IL before they’ve even attended their bio appointment. If you take a look at past timeline spreadsheets, you should be able to see a couple of cases that supports what I just wrote here.
 
So that is clearly not from an official source. You dropped the quote as if it was from USCIS’s website, whereas it is from a business website.

Anyway, it is not 100% correct. The NBC typically doesn’t wait until the background check clears before forwarding case files to the applicable FOs. We’ve had reports of AOSers receiving IL before they’ve even attended their bio appointment. If you take a look at past timeline spreadsheets, you should be able to see a couple of cases that supports what I just wrote here.

Oh, that would be great. Thank you for clarification!
 
@Sm1smom - I have a question related to the earlier proclamation 9645, which designated six countries as lacking the needed level of security of documentation and/or of collaboration with the USG. I am a citizen of one of those countries and I recall that then it was clarified that it does not apply to AOSers. I could not locate those discussions in the forum - would you kindly (re-)confirm if it is indeed the case. Many thanks.
 
Top