Britsimon
Super Moderator
"With the high refusal rate in Accra. I
don't know how safe I am with this
issue
Entry name(initial dv lottery entry);
Surname: IDDRISU ALI
Firstname: ALHASSAN
Full name: IDDRISU ALI ALHASSAN
All other documents(including ds260)
Surname: IDDRISU
firstmane: ALI ALHASSAN
Full name: IDDRISU ALI ALHASSAN
I was in Niger and registered over there
in a cafe and communication was a
problem and state of chageability is also
Niger instead of Ghana but that I learnt
won't affect it.
How serious is this especially in Accra.
Guess i don't have a chace"
Britsinon this is what Obj posted about his issue. Could be that the CO was right with regards to change of country of birth?
So I have seen what Mom posted above and somewhat agree - but I think this is a combination of factors that caused the denial.
First there is the name. From what you have said OBJ applied as someone called "ALHASSAN IDDRISU ALI". That is entirely different to someone called "ALI ALHASSAN IDDRISU" which in western use would become "ALI IDDRISU". That is strike 1 which by itself might have earned a disqualification (although some COs would forgive it if it were the only mistake on an otherwise perfect case.
Second there is the country of chargeability. That is a clear "untruth" and again, by itself is a serious mistake. However, I would expect that mistake to have been overlooked if that was the only issue (the rules specifically mention mistakes about country can be overlooked if the region is the same and the selectee gained no benefit from a genuine mistake. But it wasn't the only issue - the name error was also there and both things added together would give the CO cause for suspicion that the selectee was somehow trying to hide the identity. If the CO questioned OBJ about the country error, the statement that the internet connection in the cafe caused the incorrect choice would have infuriated the CO - as it makes NO SENSE at all. If you can choose Niger, you can choose Ghana. Again, that response (if it was asked) would just give the impression that OBJ had something to hide.
Lastly there is the embassy location. They deny lots of cases not because they are strict, but because the levels of fraudulent cases (documents etc) in that area of Africa is very high. This means COs are used to "creative" cases and have lots of practice spotting those cases and issuing a denial. So - in this case the case could have been denied anywhere but looking at the details of the case it is not that surprising that the case was denied. That is a great shame, but OBJ has very kindly shared his story as a teaching lesson for others and has accepted his fate with grace. I hope Karma will give him another chance, or perhaps something else more interesting in store for him.