It is both a fact and common sense that KCC separates two special countries in the African region, Egypt and Ethiopia. In my humble opinion... KCC has no reason to not do the same to Nepal because nepal too is a special country that requires special treatment as the two aforementioned African countries, why don't you get it?
Some people have sent me a pm to stop debating with you two as "they have their own understandings of the matter, i agree with you, kcc should do the same to nepal, political reason notwithstanding"
About the logic thing, yes yes yes i get it i do get it, Nepalese selectees have much lower chance of winning due to the number of entries and being limited to 5000, yes yes yes they're concentrated on the first 8000 cases, the same can be said for Egypt and Ethiopia except their concentration is different but still limited regardless, but wait, Egypt and Ethiopia are separated while nepal isn't, say what??
But apparently I'm always wrong because I'm not an expert, you guys are always right because you are the "experts", so no matter what i say I'm always and will always be wrong regardless. Such experts even went to scrutinize my personal details just to prove that I'm wrong
Stuff you post on the internet is not your "personal details".
I have explained this to you/your son/daughter several times. I will try one last time to specifically address the question you have asked about the AF countries compared to the AS countries - and frankly not for your benefit because your bad attitude makes me not want to bother - but perhaps others are still unclear.
In AS region in DV2015 there were a total of 1.56 million entries (2.72 million people with family members). The law says that anyone in the region may enter and each entry within the region should have an equal chance of winning and that the cases will be processed in rank order (i.e. case number). Out of the 1.56 million entries the breakdown was like this.
Nepal - 545k entries (35%)
Iran - 499k entries (32%)
RoA combine 520k entries. (33%)
Now - as I already said - the law says each entry should have the same chance - right? So - out of every 1000 entries it is only fair that 35% of those cases are from Nepal, 32% are from Iran and 33% are from ROA. Understand that?
Selectees are ranked in case number order. so people in the 1st 1000 cases should go ahead of the 2nd 1000. You can understand THAT - right?
OK then. So - you are CN 13XXX. That means everyone in the first 13000 cases should go in front of you - right?
Everyone. That is fair because that is the way the lottery works and is described in law. Now - that means there should be 35% of 13000 Nepalese cases in front of you, 32% of 13000 Iranian cases in front of you, and 33% of 13000 ROA cases in front of you. You agree with that fairness - right??? NOw - I am talking about CASES. Each case has the right to attach family members, so the family numbers will be higher than the cases. Don't think about anything else for a minute - just let that sink in.
Did you wait for a minute?
OK - now I will let you do the math and figure out those numbers. AS you know no single country can take more than 7% of the global available visas, and both Nepal and Iran are limited during the draw process which is why Nepal does not have 4550 cases (about 7500 people) under 13000 - but don't worry about that.
Now - you keep asking for someone to explain the difference with Egypt and Ethiopia. Those two countries do not represent 35% or 32% of the African region entries and in the end will take only a small number of visas between them (Egypt will probably max out at 3500 - about 17% of AF as a whole. Ethiopia won't get half of that number. So - spacing their cases out over the 12 months favors the
majority of cases in Africa. What you want to do in Asia would favor the MINORITY of cases in Asia. So - that would not be fair or sensible.
SURELY you can understand this?????
