Just as I said, Current is used for DV lottery purposes a little differently.Thank you soooooooooooooooo much hopfully every one specialy raevsky understand this
Just as I said, Current is used for DV lottery purposes a little differently.Thank you soooooooooooooooo much hopfully every one specialy raevsky understand this
my statment mean if there are 33000 winners from europ does mean thier numbres suppose to be less than 33000 may be someone has CN 40000 or 70000 and VB will tell them when is there case will be dueYes, numbers have holes. For instance, EU numbers go 1, 3, 6, 8, 9, 10, ... 888, 890, ..., 40000
There are some holes like 2,4,5 e t.c.
So what does your statement prove?
Yes, this explanation (in the book) contradicts facts. That is why it is not the right explanation. It is not working the way it is supposed to workhttp://books.google.com/books?id=Wl...A#v=onepage&q="current means" lottery&f=false
Raevsky,
Check page 97 of this book. It clearly explains what "Current" means and how everyone with a CN becomes eligible for an interview regardless of their ranking. I still have not seen any evidence on why this year is different. Please feel free to share any proof so your statements are backed up.
I don't claim this is the final answer but your explanation is far from being satisfactory.
What I have a proof of is that open EU numbers stop before 30800. There are no open EU numbers higher than 30800 in DV-2013. You cannot fit 33088 winners into 30800 numbers even if there are no holes there. Did you get it this time?my statment mean if there are 33000 winners from europ does mean thier numbres suppose to be less than 33000 may be someone has CN 40000 or 70000 and VB will tell them when is there case will be due
What I have a proof of is that open EU numbers stop before 30800. There are no open EU numbers higher than 30800 in DV-2013. You cannot fit 33088 winners into 30800 numbers even if there are no holes there. Did you get it this time?
sorry sir i have stop now becuase arguing with you is useless and you are not adding any usefull help for any one her you just want to keep talking and talking about your theroies and you don't understand the system at all sorryYou need to answer me first about 2+2 and some additional questions. Are you going to start? This is a test for your logical abilities.
What I have a proof of is that open EU numbers stop before 30800. There are no open EU numbers higher than 30800 in DV-2013. You cannot fit 33088 winners into 30800 numbers even if there are no holes there. Did you get it this time?
Guys I wouldnt argue with Raevsky... guy has been around for some time and he does know his stuff... This DV 2014 is very different from others we had... EU never had such massive case numbers in may, this indicates there will be no other draw in October or whatever it was last time....
And the hidden numbers theory which you all seem to be accusing is absolutely correct, remember they select 100 000 winners out of who only 50 000 will have a chance to win maybe even less because of additional visas required for families. If 1 application wins with family of 10, thats -10 visas out of 50 000 potty...
Give a link, that would be highly appreciated.I believe I saw somewhere someone claiming that a person on a Russian forum had a number of 31XXX which means that CNs above that 30 800 are open as well.
Simple.I don't know exactly up to which number but I wonder how do you do? How u got this number? 30 800? And why would there be people claiming having this number of 31XXX if your theory is true?
Well regards to the FACTS he states, ok I wouldn't argue, but sometimes he only gives his OPINIONS which are not necessarily and not always true. He can be wrong sometimes u know. We don't need to follow anyone's statements blindly just because they try to know things better than the rest. only time will tell what's gonna happen and at this point we can only guess and nobody is either right or wrong. Until raevsky presents some facts to support his arguments I or anyone else here can choose whether to believe in what he says or not.
Give a link, that would be highly appreciated.
Simple.
Here is a nice tool.
https://ceac.state.gov/CEACStatTracker/Status.aspx
You put a number, like 2013 EU1, and you get an answer. Not all consulates are in the system though, so the information is not complete. Howeverm it is more than enough information to determine there cannot be any numbers higher than 30800 for EU.
Here is complete printout of what the tools gives between 30000 and 31000:
Number Full Number Status Fam Cons Diff
'EU' 30033 '2013EU30033' 'Ready' 2 'NPL' 41
'EU' 30046 '2013EU30046' 'Ready' 4 'SKO' 13
'EU' 30051 '2013EU30051' 'Ready' 2 'MDD' 5
'EU' 30067 '2013EU30067' 'Ready' 1 'FRN' 16
'EU' 30078 '2013EU30078' 'Ready' 1 'SOF' 11
'EU' 30096 '2013EU30096' 'Ready' 1 'TBL' 18
'EU' 30101 '2013EU30101' 'Ready' 1 'WRW' 5
'EU' 30103 '2013EU30103' 'Ready' 4 'SOF' 2
'EU' 30112 '2013EU30112' 'Ready' 1 'JRS' 9
'EU' 30124 '2013EU30124' 'Ready' 1 'WRW' 12
'EU' 30134 '2013EU30134' 'Ready' 3 'ANK' 10
'EU' 30153 '2013EU30153' 'Ready' 1 'BLG' 19
'EU' 30159 '2013EU30159' 'Administrative Processing' 2 'MOS' 6
'EU' 30160 '2013EU30160' 'Ready' 1 'WRW' 1
'EU' 30162 '2013EU30162' 'Ready' 1 'PRS' 2
'EU' 30165 '2013EU30165' 'Ready' 5 'SKO' 3
'EU' 30188 '2013EU30188' 'Ready' 6 'ANK' 23
'EU' 30189 '2013EU30189' 'Ready' 2 'SOF' 1
'EU' 30190 '2013EU30190' 'Ready' 1 'ANK' 1
'EU' 30196 '2013EU30196' 'Ready' 1 'NPL' 6
'EU' 30218 '2013EU30218' 'Ready' 1 'FRN' 22
'EU' 30228 '2013EU30228' 'Ready' 1 'NPL' 10
'EU' 30233 '2013EU30233' 'Ready' 1 'WRW' 5
'EU' 30240 '2013EU30240' 'Ready' 2 'WRW' 7
'EU' 30252 '2013EU30252' 'Ready' 4 'KEV' 12
'EU' 30294 '2013EU30294' 'Ready' 4 'FRN' 42
'EU' 30306 '2013EU30306' 'Ready' 1 'WRW' 12
'EU' 30323 '2013EU30323' 'Ready' 3 'TBL' 17
'EU' 30328 '2013EU30328' 'Ready' 1 'ANK' 5
'EU' 30346 '2013EU30346' 'Ready' 2 'LND' 18
'EU' 30347 '2013EU30347' 'Ready' 2 'ATH' 1
'EU' 30372 '2013EU30372' 'Ready' 3 'MTL' 25
'EU' 30380 '2013EU30380' 'Ready' 1 'WRW' 8
'EU' 30383 '2013EU30383' 'Ready' 2 'TIA' 3
'EU' 30407 '2013EU30407' 'Ready' 4 'FRN' 24
'EU' 30433 '2013EU30433' 'Ready' 3 'MOS' 26
'EU' 30461 '2013EU30461' 'Ready' 3 'TIA' 28
'EU' 30487 '2013EU30487' 'Ready' 4 'MOS' 26
'EU' 30514 '2013EU30514' 'Ready' 2 'WRW' 27
'EU' 30522 '2013EU30522' 'Ready' 1 'FRN' 8
'EU' 30527 '2013EU30527' 'Ready' 1 'BCH' 5
'EU' 30530 '2013EU30530' 'Administrative Processing' 2 'MOS' 3
'EU' 30531 '2013EU30531' 'Ready' 2 'BLG' 1
'EU' 30532 '2013EU30532' 'Ready' 1 'TBL' 1
The tools does not give anything after 30532, but should if there are numbers under 31000. The difference between 31000 and 30532 is 468, 11 times larger than the largest difference (42) between consequtive numbers (30294 - 30252 = 42, that is maximum so far)