Disorderly conduct can be a CIMT, it just involves a little more on the officer to get the IJ to consider it. But I never said anything about two non-CIMT equalling a CIMT. I was speaking about combination of DUI & DUS. Disorderly conduct has nothing to do with it, but since you asked..
"Disorderly Conduct (SPLIT)
Disorderly conduct generally is not a CIMT where evil intent is
not necessarily involved. See Matter of S?, 5 I. & N. Dec. 576 (BIA 1953), Matter of P?, 2 I. & N. Dec. 117 (BIA 1944), and Matter of Mueller, 11 I. & N. Dec. 268 BIA 1965)."
So, if a officer can show evil intent, then it can be considered by the immigration court.
DUI is a crime, it is not a CIMT, unless you were found to be driving after you knew you were not allowed to drive. The license isn't the important part, being ordered by the State not to drive and driving anyways is.
Think of that as violating a court order, the court told you not to drive and you did it anyway. Violation of a Protection order (deportable crime) will get you deported to, you were told to leave someone alone and you violated a court order.
BTW... I wrote my fair share of NTA's, Adm. Removals and etc., I did my job and I did it well. If you don't like the system, then pack your bag and go the F home.
Come to think of it, I had a hand in sending 10,000+ aliens home over the years. That was a blast...
II. DETERMINING WHETHER A CRIME INVOLVES MORAL TURPITUDE
As a general rule, a crime involves "moral turpitude" if it is inherently base, vile, or depraved, and contrary to the accepted rules of morality and the duties owed between persons or to society in general. Moral turpitude is generally defined as acts or omissions that are so far contrary to the moral laws, so base or vile as to be contrary to the accepted and customary rule of right and duty between people. Jordan v. DeGeorge, 341 U.S. 223, 71 S.Ct. 703 (1951). Neither the seriousness of the offense or the severity of the sentence imposed is determinative of whether a crime involves moral turpitude. It is rather a question of the offender's evil intent or corruption of the mind. Matter of Khourn, 21 I. & N. Dec. 1042 (BIA 1997). Conviction for distribution of cocaine is a conviction for CIMT where knowledge or intent is an element of the offense and evil intent exists. Matter of Serna, 20 I. & N. Dec. 579 (BIA 1992). A crime involving moral turpitude is an act which is per se morally reprehensible and intrinsically wrong or malum in se. Id. A conspiracy to commit an offense involves moral turpitude when the underlying substantive offense is a CIMT. Matter of Bader, 17 I. & N. Dec. 525 (BIA 1980); see also Pichardo v. INS, 104 F.3d 756 (5th Cir. 1997).
dafortycal
I have a question for you DUI is a DUI. How does it matter whether I have license to drive or not. DUI is Crime but your saying is not CIMT. Then I get mad with the officer and He gives a Disorderly Conduct another non-CIMT. Under what logic getting them together becomes a CIMT I don't understand. If you are an EX Ins officer then I don't know they keep people like you without rationality and judgment. If that is the case then this country is no better than Somalia. No government no rules no rationality.