gc_tx_2003
Registered Users (C)
which one of these 3 cases ?
IT has to one of these 3 cases ( ofcourse with no legislative changes).
Hypothetical priority date : dec 2003
CASE 1:
EB1--> EB2 (ROW) --> EB3(ROW) --> EB3 SCH A --> EB2(IN/CH)--> EB3(IN/CH/MX/PP).
This is worst case, for some one say filed in Dec 2003.
EB2 may be 2-3 years, EB 4-6 years
CASE 2:
EB1--> EB2 (ROW) --> EB3(ROW) --> EB2(IN/CH)--> EB3(IN/CH/MX/PP) -->
EB3 SCH A
EB2 may be 2-3 years, EB3 3-4 years
CASE 3:
EB1--> EB2 (ROW) --> EB2(IN/CH)--> EB3(ROW) --> EB3(IN/CH/MX/PP)
--->EB3 SCH A
This is the best case.
EB2 may be 6-9 mo, EB3 may be 1-2 years.
IT has to one of these 3 cases ( ofcourse with no legislative changes).
Hypothetical priority date : dec 2003
CASE 1:
EB1--> EB2 (ROW) --> EB3(ROW) --> EB3 SCH A --> EB2(IN/CH)--> EB3(IN/CH/MX/PP).
This is worst case, for some one say filed in Dec 2003.
EB2 may be 2-3 years, EB 4-6 years
CASE 2:
EB1--> EB2 (ROW) --> EB3(ROW) --> EB2(IN/CH)--> EB3(IN/CH/MX/PP) -->
EB3 SCH A
EB2 may be 2-3 years, EB3 3-4 years
CASE 3:
EB1--> EB2 (ROW) --> EB2(IN/CH)--> EB3(ROW) --> EB3(IN/CH/MX/PP)
--->EB3 SCH A
This is the best case.
EB2 may be 6-9 mo, EB3 may be 1-2 years.