Delicateone
Registered Users (C)
58% SWA and 42% Regional
I think 58% SWA and 42% Regional in DBEC with PD late 2003, 2004 & 2005.
I think 58% SWA and 42% Regional in DBEC with PD late 2003, 2004 & 2005.
Dallas Backlog Elimination Center Tracking
- Thread starter gp111
- Start date
gc_maze said:
I agree it is unfair, but there are not so many of them, who could file from Kansas, South/North Dakota, Nebraska, Idaho, Iowa, Montana. There are almost no businesses there which allow to file for green card through LC.
I was told that some attorneys filed cases from those states because of speed issue but based on the law they should have filed from California and Texas.
I am not sure that DBEC will approve such type of cases blindly.
univemployee
Registered Users (C)
Data Review is not final stage.
Check this. This is from ICARUS, who helped the forum a lot earlier.
http://boards.immigrationportal.com/showthread.php?p=1190480#post1190480
suruvu said:
Check this. This is from ICARUS, who helped the forum a lot earlier.
http://boards.immigrationportal.com/showthread.php?p=1190480#post1190480
s_chicago said:For example, under chicago region, before states sent cases to dBEC, the processing dates was like this:
Neb : 2/05
Kan : 1/05
Oh : 12/04
Minn : 7/04
Missouri : 7/04
Win : 5/04
IL : 5/04
IA: 4/04
MI : 9/03
IND : 4/01
so you see, there are regional cases in dBEC from chicago alone even up to Feb' 2005.
Lots of Regional cases are still pending.
The total number of Regianal cases not more than 55-60K in both BECs out of 350K total number of cases. The ratio Regianal/SWA is around 1/6
univemployee
Registered Users (C)
I found some more usefull info about the case number.
"If your case number is truly D-04258-xxxx, that means that data entry was completed back on the 258th day of 2004".
So guys calculate when your case dataentry happened and expect 45 day letters.
"If your case number is truly D-04258-xxxx, that means that data entry was completed back on the 258th day of 2004".
So guys calculate when your case dataentry happened and expect 45 day letters.
Delicateone
Registered Users (C)
Few SWA cases received 45 Day letter recently Check these posts
http://www.immigrationportal.com/showpost.php?p=1265185&postcount=129
http://www.immigrationportal.com/showpost.php?p=1265886&postcount=130
Originally Posted by Sgkrao
Called my lawyer and found out that they sent reply to the 45 ay letter on Sept.13, 2005. They never mentioned to me this, inspite of me having requested them to do so. I had to call.
Hoping to get my labor done in a couple of months
PD - MI :11/18/03
RIR
45 day letter: Replied on 9/13/05
Screen shot : Case Status - RIR.
http://www.immigrationportal.com/showpost.php?p=1265185&postcount=129
http://www.immigrationportal.com/showpost.php?p=1265886&postcount=130
Originally Posted by Sgkrao
Called my lawyer and found out that they sent reply to the 45 ay letter on Sept.13, 2005. They never mentioned to me this, inspite of me having requested them to do so. I had to call.
Hoping to get my labor done in a couple of months
PD - MI :11/18/03
RIR
45 day letter: Replied on 9/13/05
Screen shot : Case Status - RIR.
mohanonline
Registered Users (C)
No approvals on cases which never reached Regional until now ???
Is there any one, who got approval of their Labour which never reached Regional ?
With the examples and analysis provided by our gurus here, my case especially which never reached Regional with PD : 29TH JUNE 2004, from IOWA, wud be cleared in another 2 yrs and not until then ?
In this case i may have to seriously work on other alternatives...
Thank you,
Case Number : D-05208-5xxxx
Processing Type : RIR
Case Source : State
Category : EB2
PD : June 29th 2004
RD : Never reached.
State : IOWA
45-Letter : Never recieved.
Is there any one, who got approval of their Labour which never reached Regional ?
With the examples and analysis provided by our gurus here, my case especially which never reached Regional with PD : 29TH JUNE 2004, from IOWA, wud be cleared in another 2 yrs and not until then ?
In this case i may have to seriously work on other alternatives...
Thank you,
Case Number : D-05208-5xxxx
Processing Type : RIR
Case Source : State
Category : EB2
PD : June 29th 2004
RD : Never reached.
State : IOWA
45-Letter : Never recieved.
needgoodluck
Registered Users (C)
Where is my case?
Hi, I registered this forum just a few minutes ago. Thanks everyone for sharing infromation here. The following is my case information, please add to the thread.
Case #: Not available (I dropped my case in the state office building by myself. The receptionist at the door took the package. Since then, I heard nothing about my case. Is there a way to find out case #?)
PD: 12/22/04 (I dropped my case at that day. Is this my PD?)
Processing Type: RIR (EB2)
Case Source: State (Utah)
45-day-letter: Waiting. I don't know where my case is.
Thanks.
Hi, I registered this forum just a few minutes ago. Thanks everyone for sharing infromation here. The following is my case information, please add to the thread.
Case #: Not available (I dropped my case in the state office building by myself. The receptionist at the door took the package. Since then, I heard nothing about my case. Is there a way to find out case #?)
PD: 12/22/04 (I dropped my case at that day. Is this my PD?)
Processing Type: RIR (EB2)
Case Source: State (Utah)
45-day-letter: Waiting. I don't know where my case is.
Thanks.
sunofeast_GC
Registered Users (C)
Guys,
My one friend got approval today with PD Sep-2003, Hope I too get soon. FIFO doesn't seems to be working..
Any news from senate?
Thanks
My one friend got approval today with PD Sep-2003, Hope I too get soon. FIFO doesn't seems to be working..
Any news from senate?
Thanks
Last edited by a moderator:
My guess for Regional RIR cases is end of year not mid 2006
Take a look at the tracker than JustWatching is to meticulously maintaining (thanks a ton!!!) for us. If you look at the Regional cases for October 2003 and later, you will notice that this corresponds, in terms of quantity, roughly to the cases April 2003 - September 2003. That's because the later the date, the fewer cases made it to Regional. If you look at the timeframe it took the DBEC to work on April thru September, it is around two months. Projecting that October 2003 until the end will take the same time, means that they should be done with the Regional cases around the end of the year, assuming they continue at the same pace.
s_chicago said:
Take a look at the tracker than JustWatching is to meticulously maintaining (thanks a ton!!!) for us. If you look at the Regional cases for October 2003 and later, you will notice that this corresponds, in terms of quantity, roughly to the cases April 2003 - September 2003. That's because the later the date, the fewer cases made it to Regional. If you look at the timeframe it took the DBEC to work on April thru September, it is around two months. Projecting that October 2003 until the end will take the same time, means that they should be done with the Regional cases around the end of the year, assuming they continue at the same pace.
Senator Rober Byrd
Fucked Up Racist Senator BYRD wants to kill immigration. here is the scoop
"11/01/2005: Senate Judiciary Bill at the Brink of Collapse Unless Everybody Contacts Senators and Congressmen!!!
* The full Senate failed to take a roll call for this bill today. Believe it or not, Senator Byrd intends to offer an amendment tomorrow (11/2/05) to remove the H-1B and immigrant visa retrogression provisions passed by the Senate Judiciary Committee from the Budget Reconciliation Package."
He is a senile old racist ####. for corroboration, look at this piece of news
With Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
For the story behind the story...
Thursday, Jan. 20, 2005 9:51 p.m. EST
CORE: Byrd's Condi Delay Is 'Racist'
The Congress of Racial Equality blasted Sen. Robert Byrd on Thursday for holding up full Senate confirmation for Secretary of State nominee Condoleezza Rice, denouncing the former Ku Klux Klansman as an unreconstructed "racist."
"It's not surprising," CORE spokesman Niger Innis told NewsMax. "Byrd was a racist 50 years ago under the guise of leading the Dixiecrats and he's a non-reformed Dixiecrat today."
Fucked Up Racist Senator BYRD wants to kill immigration. here is the scoop
"11/01/2005: Senate Judiciary Bill at the Brink of Collapse Unless Everybody Contacts Senators and Congressmen!!!
* The full Senate failed to take a roll call for this bill today. Believe it or not, Senator Byrd intends to offer an amendment tomorrow (11/2/05) to remove the H-1B and immigrant visa retrogression provisions passed by the Senate Judiciary Committee from the Budget Reconciliation Package."
He is a senile old racist ####. for corroboration, look at this piece of news
With Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
For the story behind the story...
Thursday, Jan. 20, 2005 9:51 p.m. EST
CORE: Byrd's Condi Delay Is 'Racist'
The Congress of Racial Equality blasted Sen. Robert Byrd on Thursday for holding up full Senate confirmation for Secretary of State nominee Condoleezza Rice, denouncing the former Ku Klux Klansman as an unreconstructed "racist."
"It's not surprising," CORE spokesman Niger Innis told NewsMax. "Byrd was a racist 50 years ago under the guise of leading the Dixiecrats and he's a non-reformed Dixiecrat today."
Brd's Racism proved again and again
Why did the Post protect Byrd's image?
There was a striking passage in last Sunday’s Page One Washington Post story about Sen. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) headlined, “A Senator’s Shame: Byrd, in His New Book, Again Confronts Early Ties to KKK.”
“Historians, political analysts and admirers have long sought to reconcile Byrd’s early Klan affiliation with his image as a pillar of the Senate,” reporter Eric Pianin wrote. “More extraordinary is how he managed to overcome such a blot on his record to twice become Senate majority leader.”
It’s true. Byrd has indeed enjoyed an image as a pillar of the Senate. And given his history, that seems a bit odd.
How do you suppose it happened? Do you think a newspaper — say The Washington Post — might have had something to do with it?
Sunday’s article, based in part on the senator’s new autobiography, details how in the early 1940s Byrd started a chapter of the Klan in Crab Orchard, W.Va., recruited members, appealed to the KKK’s national leadership and became the local “exalted cyclops.”
The story details how Byrd remained active in the Klan for longer than he has ever acknowledged and how, in 1945, he wrote a letter saying that he would rather die than see the United States “degraded by race mongrels.”
It was strong stuff. But surely nothing new, right? Surely the Post has covered that territory many times before, right? After all, Byrd has been in the Senate since 1959.
Well, actually, not. A review of the paper’s coverage of Byrd reveals that, on the whole, the Post has been extraordinarily reluctant to investigate — or even criticize — the Democratic leader’s Klan history.
According to a search of the Nexis database, since 1977, 32 stories in the Post used Byrd’s name and the words “Klan” or “KKK.”
Three of them were letters to the editor. One was a book review. A few were stories in which Byrd’s name and “Klan” or “KKK” appeared but were not related.
Two were articles about Louisiana Klansman David Duke, who proudly cited Byrd’s former membership in the organization. One was a profile of another Klan leader who also proudly claimed Byrd as one of his own.
One was a brief “Names and Faces” account of a routine by comedian Dennis Miller, in which it was noted that an audience booed when Miller said Byrd was “burning the cross at both ends.”
One was a brief item criticizing a Byrd political opponent who brought up Byrd’s Klan membership. Another was a news story mentioning the same incident.
One was a story from 1979 that described a speech by then-NAACP chief Benjamin Hooks decrying the Klan. The Post reported that Byrd was in attendance, but the paper did not mention — yes, did not mention — that Byrd once belonged to the Klan.
A number of other articles contained brief mentions of Byrd’s past, such as the story from 1977 that described Byrd as “a poor boy from the West Virginia coal towns who worked as a butcher, a welder in the Baltimore shipyards and once belonged to the Ku Klux Klan.”
Another story, from 1993, described Byrd as a “former filling-station attendant, meat cutter, produce salesman and shipyard worker — once even a member of the Ku Klux Klan” who had become a “prince of the realm” in the Senate.
You get the idea. Over the years, the Post has often steered clear of Byrd’s history with the Klan.
There were very, very few exceptions, such as the story in 1981 in which reporter Martin Schram directly confronted Byrd over the issue and got an extremely chilly response. Much more common was the admiring Post profile of Byrd from 1999 — the paper was lauding Byrd’s opposition to the Clinton impeachment — which began this way:
“Sen. Robert Byrd is a believer in holy documents. They are the sacred tools for defending his Senate against the savages. The Bible is one such holy book. He learned to read with the King James Version and, seventy-some years later, has little use for any other Bible. Something about modern translations seems to sap the words of their sacred power. The U.S. Constitution is also holy writ. Watch him wield it. ...”
Not until 2,532 words into a 2,779-word story did the Post say this:
“As a young man campaigning for the West Virginia legislature in the ‘40s, Byrd briefly joined the Ku Klux Klan, hoping to gain votes. He quickly quit and has spent the past half-century publicly regretting it.”
The Post didn’t even go on a crusade when, in March 2001, Byrd twice used the N-word on national television. The paper published just one story, when Byrd apologized.
And now, after all these years of mostly soft-pedaling Byrd’s past, the Post wonders how it is that Byrd has managed to be regarded as a pillar of the Senate.
How do you suppose that happened?
Why did the Post protect Byrd's image?
There was a striking passage in last Sunday’s Page One Washington Post story about Sen. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) headlined, “A Senator’s Shame: Byrd, in His New Book, Again Confronts Early Ties to KKK.”
“Historians, political analysts and admirers have long sought to reconcile Byrd’s early Klan affiliation with his image as a pillar of the Senate,” reporter Eric Pianin wrote. “More extraordinary is how he managed to overcome such a blot on his record to twice become Senate majority leader.”
It’s true. Byrd has indeed enjoyed an image as a pillar of the Senate. And given his history, that seems a bit odd.
How do you suppose it happened? Do you think a newspaper — say The Washington Post — might have had something to do with it?
Sunday’s article, based in part on the senator’s new autobiography, details how in the early 1940s Byrd started a chapter of the Klan in Crab Orchard, W.Va., recruited members, appealed to the KKK’s national leadership and became the local “exalted cyclops.”
The story details how Byrd remained active in the Klan for longer than he has ever acknowledged and how, in 1945, he wrote a letter saying that he would rather die than see the United States “degraded by race mongrels.”
It was strong stuff. But surely nothing new, right? Surely the Post has covered that territory many times before, right? After all, Byrd has been in the Senate since 1959.
Well, actually, not. A review of the paper’s coverage of Byrd reveals that, on the whole, the Post has been extraordinarily reluctant to investigate — or even criticize — the Democratic leader’s Klan history.
According to a search of the Nexis database, since 1977, 32 stories in the Post used Byrd’s name and the words “Klan” or “KKK.”
Three of them were letters to the editor. One was a book review. A few were stories in which Byrd’s name and “Klan” or “KKK” appeared but were not related.
Two were articles about Louisiana Klansman David Duke, who proudly cited Byrd’s former membership in the organization. One was a profile of another Klan leader who also proudly claimed Byrd as one of his own.
One was a brief “Names and Faces” account of a routine by comedian Dennis Miller, in which it was noted that an audience booed when Miller said Byrd was “burning the cross at both ends.”
One was a brief item criticizing a Byrd political opponent who brought up Byrd’s Klan membership. Another was a news story mentioning the same incident.
One was a story from 1979 that described a speech by then-NAACP chief Benjamin Hooks decrying the Klan. The Post reported that Byrd was in attendance, but the paper did not mention — yes, did not mention — that Byrd once belonged to the Klan.
A number of other articles contained brief mentions of Byrd’s past, such as the story from 1977 that described Byrd as “a poor boy from the West Virginia coal towns who worked as a butcher, a welder in the Baltimore shipyards and once belonged to the Ku Klux Klan.”
Another story, from 1993, described Byrd as a “former filling-station attendant, meat cutter, produce salesman and shipyard worker — once even a member of the Ku Klux Klan” who had become a “prince of the realm” in the Senate.
You get the idea. Over the years, the Post has often steered clear of Byrd’s history with the Klan.
There were very, very few exceptions, such as the story in 1981 in which reporter Martin Schram directly confronted Byrd over the issue and got an extremely chilly response. Much more common was the admiring Post profile of Byrd from 1999 — the paper was lauding Byrd’s opposition to the Clinton impeachment — which began this way:
“Sen. Robert Byrd is a believer in holy documents. They are the sacred tools for defending his Senate against the savages. The Bible is one such holy book. He learned to read with the King James Version and, seventy-some years later, has little use for any other Bible. Something about modern translations seems to sap the words of their sacred power. The U.S. Constitution is also holy writ. Watch him wield it. ...”
Not until 2,532 words into a 2,779-word story did the Post say this:
“As a young man campaigning for the West Virginia legislature in the ‘40s, Byrd briefly joined the Ku Klux Klan, hoping to gain votes. He quickly quit and has spent the past half-century publicly regretting it.”
The Post didn’t even go on a crusade when, in March 2001, Byrd twice used the N-word on national television. The paper published just one story, when Byrd apologized.
And now, after all these years of mostly soft-pedaling Byrd’s past, the Post wonders how it is that Byrd has managed to be regarded as a pillar of the Senate.
How do you suppose that happened?
SFO DOL - Auto Remand Cases
SFO DOL - Auto Remand Cases
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gurus:
Any insight on my question???
http://boards.immigrationportal.com...5&postcount=161
SFO DOL - Auto Remand Cases
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gurus:
Any insight on my question???
http://boards.immigrationportal.com...5&postcount=161
ent: Senate Judiciary Bill at the Brink of Collapse Unless Everybody Contracts Sen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11/01/2005: Senate Judiciary Bill at the Brink of Collapse Unless Everybody Contracts Senators and Congressmen!!!
The full Senate failed to take a roll call for this bill today. Believe it or not, Senator Byrd intends to offer an amendment tomorrow (11/2/05) to remove the H-1B and immigrant visa retrogression provisions passed by the Senate Judiciary Committee from the Budget Reconciliation Package.
Please call your Senators and urge a "NO vote on the Bird Amendment Immediately!!"
CALL THE CAPITOL SWITCHBOARD: 202-224-3121 OR GET DIRECT LINES BY CLICKING HERE: http://capwiz.com/aila2/home/
Everyone should call tonight. I mean EVERYONE. Call your friends and relatives and ask them to participate in this urgent campaign and call their Senators tonight. Call or send e-mails to your immigrant friends and alert them IMMEDIATELY! Ask them to call or send e-mails to everyone they know and ask them to call the Senators tonight. TIME IS OF ESSENCE.
This reporter will check whether our visitors did their share of work by looking at the our homepage "counter" tomorrow morning.
http://www.immigration-law.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11/01/2005: Senate Judiciary Bill at the Brink of Collapse Unless Everybody Contracts Senators and Congressmen!!!
The full Senate failed to take a roll call for this bill today. Believe it or not, Senator Byrd intends to offer an amendment tomorrow (11/2/05) to remove the H-1B and immigrant visa retrogression provisions passed by the Senate Judiciary Committee from the Budget Reconciliation Package.
Please call your Senators and urge a "NO vote on the Bird Amendment Immediately!!"
CALL THE CAPITOL SWITCHBOARD: 202-224-3121 OR GET DIRECT LINES BY CLICKING HERE: http://capwiz.com/aila2/home/
Everyone should call tonight. I mean EVERYONE. Call your friends and relatives and ask them to participate in this urgent campaign and call their Senators tonight. Call or send e-mails to your immigrant friends and alert them IMMEDIATELY! Ask them to call or send e-mails to everyone they know and ask them to call the Senators tonight. TIME IS OF ESSENCE.
This reporter will check whether our visitors did their share of work by looking at the our homepage "counter" tomorrow morning.
http://www.immigration-law.com/
PLEASE TAKE ACTION TONIGHT OR IT WILL BE TOO LATE FOR A LONG TIME........
From AILA:
Restrictionists are trying to hijack the debate on immigration and YOU CAN STOP THEM!
Senator Byrd intends to offer an amendment tomorrow (11/2/05) to remove the H-1B and immigrant visa retrogression provisions passed by the Senate Judiciary Committee from the Budget Reconciliation Package.
AILA MEMBERS and ADVOCATES SHOULD CALL YOUR SENATORS -- AND HAVE YOUR CLIENTS CALL -- TO URGE A NO vote ON THE BYRD AMENDMENT IMMEDIATELY!!!
DO NOT LET THE RESTRICTIONISTS CONTROL THIS DEBATE!
CALL THE CAPITOL SWITCHBOARD: 202-224-3121
OR GET DIRECT LINES BY CLICKING HERE: http://capwiz.com/aila2/home/
Your phone call is critical to perserving the integrity of this debate about H-1B and Greencard Relief.
Sample Message:
"I am a concerned constituent calling to urge Senator ( name ) to vote against an amendment expected to be offered today to the Deficit Reduction Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 2005 by Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV). This amendment reverses action taken by the Senate Judiciary Committee to increase revenue by recapturing authorized, but never used, visa numbers for foreign workers with key skills in jobs for which U.S. workers are not available.
Sen. Byrd's amendment raises the revenue that would be lost by adopting the ill-advised House Judiciary Committee proposal to raise the fees on L-1 intra-company transferees to $1,500 per visa, which would discourage overseas companies from opening plants in the U.S. and would encourage countries to retaliate against U.S. companies seeking to transfer U.S. managers to oversee their international operations.
Please vote no when this amendment comes up for consideration. If not, the Senate will lose the opportunity to raise revenue by allowing the use of visas that were authorized by Congress, but never used due to administrative delays."
Phone numbers
Lisa Murkowski AK (202) 224-6665
Ted Stevens AK (202) 224-3004
Jeff Sessions AL (202) 224-4124
Richard Shelby AL (202) 224-5744
Blanche Lincoln AR (202) 224-4843
Mark Pryor AR (202) 224-2353
Jon Kyl AZ (202) 224-4521
John McCain AZ (202) 224-2235
Barbara Boxer CA (202) 224-3553
Dianne Feinstein CA (202) 224-3841
Wayne Allard CO (202) 224-5941
Ken Salazar CO (202) 224-5852
Christopher Dodd CT (202) 224-2823
Joseph Lieberman CT (202) 224-4041
Joseph Biden DE (202) 224-5042
Thomas Carper DE (202) 224-2441
Mel Martinez FL (202) 224-3041
Bill Nelson FL (202) 224-5274
Saxby Chambliss GA (202) 224-3521
Johnny Isakson GA (202) 224-3643
Daniel Akaka HI (202) 224-6361
Daniel Inouye HI (202) 224-3934
Chuck Grassley IA (202) 224-3744
Tom Harkin IA (202) 224-3254
Larry Craig ID (202) 224-2752
Michael Crapo ID (202) 224-6142
Richard Durbin IL (202) 224-2152
Barack Obama IL (202) 224-2854
Evan Bayh IN (202) 224-5623
Richard Lugar IN (202) 224-4814
Sam Brownback KS (202) 224-6521
Pat Roberts KS (202) 224-4774
Jim Bunning KY (202) 224-4343
Mitch McConnell KY (202) 224-2541
Mary Landrieu LA (202) 224-5824
David Vitter LA (202) 224-4623
Edward Kennedy MA (202) 224-4543
John Kerry MA (202) 224-2742
Barbara Mikulski MD (202) 224-4654
Paul Sarbanes MD (202) 224-4524
Susan Collins ME (202) 224-2523
Olympia Snowe ME (202) 224-5344
Carl Levin MI (202) 224-6221
Debbie Stabenow MI (202) 224-4822
Norm Coleman MN (202) 224-5641
Mark Dayton MN (202) 224-3244
Christopher Bond MO (202) 224-5721
James Talent MO (202) 224-6154
Thad Cochran MS (202) 224-5054
Trent Lott MS (202) 224-6253
Max Baucus MT (202) 224-2651
Conrad Burns MT (202) 224-2644
Richard Burr NC (202) 224-3154
Elizabeth Dole NC (202) 224-6342
Kent Conrad ND (202) 224-2043
Byron Dorgan ND (202) 224-2551
Chuck Hagel NE (202) 224-4224
Ben Nelson NE (202) 224-6551
Judd Gregg NH (202) 224-3324
John Sununu NH (202) 224-2841
Jon Corzine NJ (202) 224-4744
Frank Lautenberg NJ (202) 224-3224
Jeff Bingaman NM (202) 224-5521
Pete Domenici NM (202) 224-6621
John Ensign NV (202) 224-6244
Harry Reid NV (202) 224-3542
Hillary Clinton NY (202) 224-4451
Charles Schumer NY (202) 224-6542
Mike DeWine OH (202) 224-2315
George Voinovich OH (202) 224-3353
Tom Coburn OK (202) 224-5754
James Inhofe OK (202) 224-4721
Gordon Smith OR (202) 224-3753
Ron Wyden OR (202) 224-5244
Rick Santorum PA (202) 224-6324
Arlen Specter PA (202) 224-4254
Lincoln Chafee RI (202) 224-2921
Jack Reed RI (202) 224-4642
Jim DeMint SC (202) 224-6121
Lindsey Graham SC (202) 224-5972
Tim Johnson SD (202) 224-5842
John Thune SD (202) 224-2321
Lamar Alexander TN (202) 224-4944
Bill Frist TN (202) 224-3344
John Cornyn TX (202) 224-2934
Kay Hutchison TX (202) 224-5922
Robert Bennett UT (202) 224-5444
Orrin Hatch UT (202) 224-5251
George Allen VA (202) 224-4024
John Warner VA (202) 224-2023
James Jeffords VT (202) 224-5141
Patrick Leahy VT (202) 224-4242
Maria Cantwell WA (202) 224-3441
Patty Murray WA (202) 224-2621
Russell Feingold WI (202) 224-5323
Herb Kohl WI (202) 224-5653
Robert Byrd WV (202) 224-3954
John Rockefeller WV (202) 224-6472
Michael Enzi WY (202) 224-3424
Craig Thomas WY (202) 224-6441
Last edited by a moderator:
Amit_K_Bhatia@h
Registered Users (C)
Question
Gurus,
My PD is May 2003 and my case is in DBEC. I haven’t received any status on my LC whereas by looking at the tracker it seems that DBEC is processing cases from Aug/Sept.
Does anyone know what could be reason for this?
I asked my attorney to inquire about this; she said that DBEC is not responding any query. How true is that?
Thanks,
Amit
Gurus,
My PD is May 2003 and my case is in DBEC. I haven’t received any status on my LC whereas by looking at the tracker it seems that DBEC is processing cases from Aug/Sept.
Does anyone know what could be reason for this?
I asked my attorney to inquire about this; she said that DBEC is not responding any query. How true is that?
Thanks,
Amit
DesiGCMirage
Registered Users (C)
which state did you file from?Amit_K_Bhatia@h said:
Immigration bill likey to be put off till 2006
Community!
Here are excerpts from Bloomberg news
Quote:
Immigration, which has split the Republican Party, is also on the agenda next year. Republicans are divided over whether the more than 10 million undocumented people living in this country must return to their native countries before applying to enter the U.S. legally or will be allowed to apply from the U.S.
`Strong Differences'
``These are issues that create some strong differences of opinion within our conference,'' Thune said. ``It's why they keep getting punted down the road. There isn't broad agreement on how to proceed.''
Senator Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican, said immigration would rise to the top of the party's to-do list.
``That's the one most likely to be addressed because public support for a solution is growing,'' he said. ``Immigration is building to the point that you can't ignore it anymore.''
Unquote:
Source:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000087&sid=aNoIS5.VXXG0&refer=top_world_news
ShivaB
Community!
Here are excerpts from Bloomberg news
Quote:
Immigration, which has split the Republican Party, is also on the agenda next year. Republicans are divided over whether the more than 10 million undocumented people living in this country must return to their native countries before applying to enter the U.S. legally or will be allowed to apply from the U.S.
`Strong Differences'
``These are issues that create some strong differences of opinion within our conference,'' Thune said. ``It's why they keep getting punted down the road. There isn't broad agreement on how to proceed.''
Senator Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican, said immigration would rise to the top of the party's to-do list.
``That's the one most likely to be addressed because public support for a solution is growing,'' he said. ``Immigration is building to the point that you can't ignore it anymore.''
Unquote:
Source:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000087&sid=aNoIS5.VXXG0&refer=top_world_news
ShivaB
Support the Senate Judiciary Committee Proposal
Please, support the Senate Judiciary Committee Proposal for H-1B and Retrogression Relief right now otherwise it would be too late.
Use following link and choose "Support the Senate Judiciary Committee Proposal for H-1B and Retrogression Relief" for your support
http://capwiz.com/aila2/home/
We all are drop of water. If we all get together we can make ocean. Our contribution will make difference if you act right now....
Please, support the Senate Judiciary Committee Proposal for H-1B and Retrogression Relief right now otherwise it would be too late.
Use following link and choose "Support the Senate Judiciary Committee Proposal for H-1B and Retrogression Relief" for your support
http://capwiz.com/aila2/home/
We all are drop of water. If we all get together we can make ocean. Our contribution will make difference if you act right now....