Citizenship Eligibility

grossmont

Registered Users (C)
I have an unusual case and I was hoping that someone in this forum can give me a definitive answer. I have received three answers... two from lawyers, and one from USCIS customer service. All of them different.

My wife married a friend of mine (who had sponsored her with a fiance visa) in October 2005 and she received Permanent Residence status on December 22, 2005.

My friend passed away in June 2006 and so she returned to her native country.

I was the executor of the estate, and when everything was settled (9 months later), she returned to the United States.

She and I started dating some time after that and we got married in December 2006.

The conditions on her permanent residence were removed in December 2007 based on her being the widow of my friend who had passed away.

My wife would like to apply for U.S. Citizenship. Is she eligible now based on her 3 year marriage to me (3 years in December 2009) ? Or does she have to wait until she has been a permanent resident for 5 years (5 years in December 2010) ?

I have received conflicting information: On one hand, I have been told that she is eligible now, because she has been married to me for 3 years. On the other, I have been told that the 3 year marriage only counts for the original sponsor of her permanent residence (my friend, who is deceased.)

Lastly, how is her long absence after the death of my friend (and another of 7 months, during our marriage) going to affect her residency requirement? In the case of the 3 year requirement, she has spent more than 18 months in the United States, but she did have that one 7 month period where she was out of the country. I have heard that spending more than 6 months in any one calendar year causes everything to reset, and I've also heard that it does not matter, and I've also heard that you basically get no credit during that calendar year.

Anyway, I haven't been able to get any definitive answers, and trying to read the actual law code is impossible for me to decipher. I appreciate any help.
 
She is eligible now as she's been married to the same US Citizen for at least 3 years before applying. The 'same' here just means the same (one) US Citizen. (May or may not be the citizen via which one got their green card).
Regarding the 7 month trip, it doesn't automatically reset the continuous presence clock. Just that the burden of proof that she didn't break continuous residence is now upon your wife. (so this will depend on where you were for those 7 months)
 
That's really great news. Since no one in these forums has posted an opposing point of view, and I got the same idea after reviewing the N-400 application and instructions, I feel confident that you are correct.

As far as the 7 month absence, it was due to her traveling with my stepdaughter (her daughter) to receive medical care. During that period, she continued to be on the rental lease, we had joint bank accounts, and we've filed joint tax returns for the last 3 years. I believe that will be good enough evidence to show continued residence in the United States.

Thanks for your help.
 
How long have you been a US citizen?

You mentioned her husband died in June 2006 and she returned home and you married her in December 2006. According to your timeline, you married her (in her home country) and she returned to US in March 2007, correct?
 
I am a lifetime U.S. Citizen.

Good catch on the timeline. I got it wrong. I totaled up the days from when they got married, and not from the day he died and she left the country.

She was actually gone for about 4 months. She returned in October, 2006. We were married here (in the United States) in December, 2006.
 
I believe you have to be married to the same person, and living with them. Double check. I don't think she will qualify on the 3 yr marriage....
 
I believe you have to be married to the same person, and living with them. Double check. I don't think she will qualify on the 3 yr marriage....

She and I have been married for 3 years now and are living together (with our daughter, who I sponsored for the immigrant visa).

When you state that you must be married to the same person, do you mean the same person who originally sponsored her (my deceased friend)? And if this is the case, can you point me in the direction of the regulation which states this? I'd like to know for sure, since I haven't been able to get a definitive answer from USCIS and my two lawyers.
 
grossmont,
I don't see a reason preventing your wife from currently filing for naturalization, but I could be wrong. I haven't seen a post similar to your situation and perhaps someone who has seen it will chime in. It is possible that an immigration officer can interpret the regulations (either correctly or erroneously) to mean that she has to wait out the 5 year period. I suggest you seek an advisory opinion from USCIS either directly or through an attorney to eliminate that possibility.
 
grossmont,
I hope it works out well for you. Please post back so that others in your situation can be informed as well. Good luck!
 
I am a lifetime U.S. Citizen.

Good catch on the timeline. I got it wrong. I totaled up the days from when they got married, and not from the day he died and she left the country.

She was actually gone for about 4 months. She returned in October, 2006. We were married here (in the United States) in December, 2006.

Since she has been in a marital union with you since December 2006 and she has been a LPR since December 2005, she would be able to apply immediately for naturalization based on 3 year rule. The evidence you have to prove continuous residency for her 7 month trip outside the US appears to be sufficient.
 
She and I have been married for 3 years now and are living together (with our daughter, who I sponsored for the immigrant visa).
Your daughter with your wife? Or your wife's daughter? If you are a born US citizen, why did you get an immigrant visa for your daughter, when you probably could have directly obtained a US passport for her?
When you state that you must be married to the same person, do you mean the same person who originally sponsored her (my deceased friend)?
No, it just has to be the same person through the entire 3 years, even if it's somebody other than who sponsored the GC. So it can't be one person for 1 year, and then another person for the other 2 years.

Visiting USCIS to ask about this is not very useful. They give wrong answers too often to be trusted. Just go ahead and apply, and then you'll find out for real.

However, once she applies, she should be prepared to answer some tough questions in the interview, because the fact that she remarried so quickly after the death (and just barely 14 months after the first marriage began) could raise suspicion that the first marriage wasn't genuine.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your daughter with your wife? Or your wife's daughter? If you are a born US citizen, why did you get an immigrant visa for your daughter, when you probably could have directly obtained a US passport for her?

Sorry for the confusion. She is my wife's daughter. And my step-daughter. Her natural father is a foreign citizen and has never met her, having abandoned her and my wife soon after she was born. She is 8 years old now.

Since I'm the only father she has had, I regularly refer to her as my daughter, and she thinks of me as her father. She is also a Permanent Resident. She'll obtain her citizenship when my wife becomes a citizen.

Also, fortunately, her natural father has recently given us paperwork allowing me to formally adopt her and we will be beginning proceedings on that shortly.

2010 is going to be a great year for us. :)
 
Also, fortunately, her natural father has recently given us paperwork allowing me to formally adopt her and we will be beginning proceedings on that shortly.
In which case she'll become a US citizen when the adoption is finalized, if at that time she didn't already acquire citizenship via her mother's naturalization.
 
Also, fortunately, her natural father has recently given us paperwork allowing me to formally adopt her and we will be beginning proceedings on that shortly.

Was the child born out of wedlock or was your wife previously married (before her last husband died)?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Was the child born out of wedlock or was your wife previously married (before her last husband died)?

My wife was previously married to a foreign citizen in her home country when she was 17. When she was 8 months pregnant, he abandoned her. The divorce was finalized a couple of years later.
 
My wife was previously married to a foreign citizen in her home country when she was 17. When she was 8 months pregnant, he abandoned her. The divorce was finalized a couple of years later.

I know I should not try to be funny - and it is a serious question you have - but I just hope the IO does not get into this line of questioning. You need to org-chart to show all the relationships and the countries. We are not only talking about 2 countries, but a "foreign country" is also in the mix ... plus the multiple marriages and the sequence of events relating to the children and adoption. There seem to be too many things inter-twined. if the IO has to understand it, it will take some effort.

My suggestion will be to forget your role in the whole dealings, and think of this in terms of your wife.

She got married to husband #1, she had a kid through husband #1, the husband #1 abandoned her just before delivery then divorced her. This was in country X. Wife's nationality was country X. Husband was country Y.
She got married again, applied for GC through 2nd husband, but husband #2 died, and she got her GC converted to unconditional as the widow of USC.
At this time, she returned to her country X to settle some affairs and lived for 9 months.
Then she married you and is trying to become USC through N400, and you are adopting her daughter.


Is that a fair sequence of events of the basic situation? Then the next question is how does her absence from US impact N400? And so on ... I think others have given good answers to your questions ... my only suggestion is to get your wife to narrate the sequence of events to the IO (if required and if asked) very clearly so that the questioning is minimal, and there is minimal ambiguity.
 
My wife was previously married to a foreign citizen in her home country when she was 17. When she was 8 months pregnant, he abandoned her. The divorce was finalized a couple of years later.

She must disclose that marriage as well. This being said, an IO may make her marriage history an issue at the interview.
 
Top