Sloner
Active Member
Hello. I think June-July.Hello my case number is 2015EU13XXX and I submit my form on 5th of February 2015. When possibly will be my interview date? I selected Lagos Embassy for the interview.
Hello. I think June-July.Hello my case number is 2015EU13XXX and I submit my form on 5th of February 2015. When possibly will be my interview date? I selected Lagos Embassy for the interview.
I am turkish expat in nigeria. But between july&august is my vacation time. And I will goto Turkey. How should I make my travel plan?do you know when NVC sends me the invitation email-how long before the interview?You might get a July interview, if not, it should be August. FRom the EU case I assume you are charging to an EU country. Did you go through education in EU or in Africa?
I am turkish expat in nigeria. But between july&august is my vacation time. And I will goto Turkey. How should I make my travel plan?do you know when NVC sends me the invitation email-how long before the interview?
One last question. I worked in Jordan for 5 yrs before. But i am still waiting my police clearance paper from them.in case I cannot get the paper does it affect my chance to get visa. Shall I go to the interview if i cannot get police clearance form? Because Jordan is a bit bureaucratic country.
Hi
I'm trying to log into the ESC page but it doesn't seem to work!?
Can please try to open the page and let me know!
Thanks in advance
You've applied for DV2015 on that date: 05-Oct-2013. That's what that means.Hi!
10 days ago I got my interview date. On ceac website the status was in transit. I checked a moment ago and it says ready. So far so good. However there is one part that is confusing me: on the status is says:
Case Creation Date: 05-Oct-2013. Is that an error? how come october 2013?
I wanted to refer to the website page... I don't even get the ESC page. I click on the URL but no page is given.Worked fine. What doesn't work? What did you do, and what point did it ""not work"? Perhaps if you were more clear people could help...
I wanted to refer to the website page... I don't even get the ESC page. I click on the URL but no page is given.
I've stumbled upon an interesting U.S. cable dating from 12/1/2009 about DV fraud, published by Wikileaks.org, but I don't know if you publish this sort of things. Anyway the FBI is seeking assistance:
http://m.fbi.gov/#http://www.fbi.go...-lottery-and-green-card-lottery-investigation
what do you see on the CEAC status check when your are current.?
Therefore, from the 6400 winners 1600-1800 issued visas.I've stumbled upon an interesting U.S. cable dating from 12/1/2009 about DV fraud, published by Wikileaks.org, but I don't know if you publish this sort of things. Anyway the FBI is seeking assistance:
http://m.fbi.gov/#http://www.fbi.go...-lottery-and-green-card-lottery-investigation
Therefore, from the 6400 winners 1600-1800 issued visas.
I think I found the answer to 140,000 in DV2014. My theory was correct. I did not know the cause. http://diplopundit.net/2011/10/26/o...s-failure-of-the-consular-bureaus-cst-office/
Main phrase "A final issue is that CST managers demonstrated a lack of understanding of visa issuance procedures and failed to consult appropriately with all stakeholders."
Why watch last year and statistics? Simply take a look at 2012 and choose the wrong lot.
One department chose 140,000 and did not say and did not consult.
I've stumbled upon an interesting U.S. cable dating from 12/1/2009 about DV fraud, published by Wikileaks.org, but I don't know if you publish this sort of things. Anyway the FBI is seeking assistance:
http://m.fbi.gov/#http://www.fbi.go...-lottery-and-green-card-lottery-investigation
I think he meant to say that the quoted statement would be equally applicable to what happened with DV2014. And the article is just a confirmation of what he previously concluded on how that particular department operates.This 2011 article discusses the failures with DV2012 - all of which have been explained thoroughly in this forum and none of which had anything to do with DV2014. But yeah, apart from it being old news, not making your point and not proving your theory - good job Sloner!