unitednations said:http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/763852/000095015204001707/l05136anvcsrs.txt
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1010296/000095011704002541/a37957.txt
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/832544/000119312504060624/dncsrs.htm
For three years, I have remained anonymous like most posters. Many people have call me and e-mailed me. A lot of people know who I am all about.
When peple get into juvenile postings, I tend to ignore them.
However, nyc I'm sure you are aware of the Securities and Exchange Commission. I have posted three links above which you can feel free to put in your browser. Go to the very end of the links and you will find my name.
I used to be cfo/treasuer/sox certifying officer on over $200 billion in mutual fund assets. The three links; first one is Onegroup (now JP Morgan), shareholder report, second one is HSBC, third one is Amsouth (techy, i see you live in Birmingham; i used to come to riverchase for board meetings and go golfing at the country club. Nice course by the way). I could list many more banks but you get the jest of it.
JP Morgan and HSBC are two of the top 10 banks in the world.
I am not a low level IT person. I have lived at very high levels of corporate america. I know how the system works inside outside, up, down, backwards, forwards. The people I know gives me a lot of access if I want to get an audience and get the right people to listen.,
When it comes to lobbying and talking to newspapers; who do you think will make more of a dent; person who served as CFO on two of the ten largest banks in the worlds mutual funds and certified the most f/s under SOX of anyone in USA in 2003 and 2004 or some low level IT programmers?
Because I know the system inside/out, I can make a dent if I wanted to. However, I have challenged people to come up with plausible reasons; because I can't in a way that would stand under scrutiny of the very smartest people in this country. Therefore, if you want to lobby or take a certain course without understanding the types of questions, you will get, how to debate, etc. then you are going to fail.
I only posted here because it seems that you think I am hurting the process or am free and clear from the greencard and somehow have a hidden agenda.
UN,
You are accomplished and helpful to a lot of people on the forum and otherwise. I never doubted that anyways. I don't have anything personally against you, saras or techy and understand that your comments
may be helpful in debates etc as and when it comes up.
What I was questioning was everybody's motivation not to act upon
the problems with the process and keep analyzing the whole process to
no particular end.
I don't want a GC but I would prefer an EAD. Due to retrogession, I think
there are hundreds of qualified people that are stuck.
Letting people apply for 485 and getting EAD's is probably something that
the USCIS can do by itself. This is also part of the SKIL bill.
The Congress seems to be in an agreement upon this. This is in itself
a 'favor' that the govt. has done to all the non-acting, miserable people
who keep on looking up visa bulletins but do not act.
I don't know why people keep on discussing this issue rather than
trying to do something. I also see very little support for IV's
efforts for most of its activities.
I am against this 'attitude'/inaction. It is not totally about success either. It is only about not doing anything and looking up visa bulletins every month.
The question is are we being smart by analyzing every action or are we not
by not acting at all.
I can debate the pros and cons of immigration but that is not my expertise. I can act though for what I believe makes sense and hopefully there are other people who would like to do the same.
Hopefully you can suggest something to this end.