PBECIsKillingMe
Registered Users (C)
rf_engineer_NY said:I have already talked to him and he strongly suggests going with PERM. His predictions for RIR are not so bright as the predictions expressed in our tracker here. He said that he hasn't seen any of his RIR cases (New York) approved that has a PD later than 2002. I am also a little bit worried about how DOL will react because I remember my application was a thick one and a very detailed one. I am wondering whether they will be scared of going through all that material that has been submitted and delay the RIR processing beyond the first wave of approval for my PD.
And one more thing: I am really wondering what would happen if I file for PERM and my RIR gets approved before it is officially withdrawn due toPERM re-filing.
I know I am expressing a lot of curiousity and raising many questions here, but that's what I guess all of us face, because of these ambiguous immigration rules. Just sharing my experience and thoughts. My two cents.
Please don't mind, but it looks like your lawyer is just greedy is not hesitating lieing. Our tracker shows that there are lots of approvals till month of March 2004. There is no extra benifit you are going to get by filing PERM except getting labor approval 3-4 months earlier at most. In any case you won't be able to file I-485.
If I were in your place, I would not take risk of converting (it is implicit conversion) RIR application to PERM.