tweetybird1979
New Member
Hi,
I have gained admission into a top 10 MBA school in US. Every admited student is guranteed a loan. The school allows and puts the bank name as "source of funds" in the I-20. However, I am afraid that showing loan in the I20 itself would indicate an immigrant intention to the consular officer. So, I would like everybody's opinion on which of the following is the best. I have personal funds to show.
a) Full amount from Personal Funds
b) Take maximum allowable Bank Loan and show rest as personal funds
c) take maximum allowable Bank loan and show maximum showable personal funds ( even if it means showing twice the moolah)
d) Show full amount from personal funds and then also show a loan from a bank in your home country.
I'd be happy if everybody who are in the same situation can give their vote/opinion on what is the best. The main thinking behind the question is the consulate officer should not consider " not taking loan" as "not good enough for a loan".
Thanks in Advance!
I have gained admission into a top 10 MBA school in US. Every admited student is guranteed a loan. The school allows and puts the bank name as "source of funds" in the I-20. However, I am afraid that showing loan in the I20 itself would indicate an immigrant intention to the consular officer. So, I would like everybody's opinion on which of the following is the best. I have personal funds to show.
a) Full amount from Personal Funds
b) Take maximum allowable Bank Loan and show rest as personal funds
c) take maximum allowable Bank loan and show maximum showable personal funds ( even if it means showing twice the moolah)
d) Show full amount from personal funds and then also show a loan from a bank in your home country.
I'd be happy if everybody who are in the same situation can give their vote/opinion on what is the best. The main thinking behind the question is the consulate officer should not consider " not taking loan" as "not good enough for a loan".
Thanks in Advance!