Attached is the Complaint we have filed
- Thread starter Rajiv S. Khanna
- Start date
- Status
Re: Re: A FEW POINTS
You should be right and I am right also! Officially from USCIS, the designation for MSC is different. To include it, we need OFFICIAL USCIS document/memo wrt the MSC use. Unfortunately, I have not seen any. Maybe it is also used as a Local Service Center. I am sure Rajiv will take a look at this. It is certainly another desparate dirty trick in use by UACIS.Transfers anywhere.
Try find something regarding the MSC operations.
You should be right and I am right also! Officially from USCIS, the designation for MSC is different. To include it, we need OFFICIAL USCIS document/memo wrt the MSC use. Unfortunately, I have not seen any. Maybe it is also used as a Local Service Center. I am sure Rajiv will take a look at this. It is certainly another desparate dirty trick in use by UACIS.Transfers anywhere.
Try find something regarding the MSC operations.
If you read the posts you will get some information on I-140. There is Concurrent processing after the LC is approved. There is also a recent DOL decision (funding 100 million) to eliminate the LC Backlogs. So, given the fact that the LC Backlogs have a proposed solution and one can file Concurrently,
THE PROBLEM IS THE I-485 BACKLOGS.
Actually if nothing is done, and the LC backlog problem is solved then the I-485 will get worse.
Another reason for the immediate attention to I-485 backlogs (EB-based).
Taking up only the caseof I485 backlog is strategically good because we can argue that these people are all having an approved I140 and they are just waiting for adjustment of status. Once I485 backlog problem is solved, then we can take up I140 problem. This lawsuit is a result of the big discussions that were going on in I485 forums for the past 4 or 5 months.
Media Attention
There is a strong feeling in the Core Action Team that we should hold the idea of contacting the mainstream media about the lawsuit. The inclination is towards educating the ethnic and immigration pro media about the lawsuit first.
We can discuss the pros and cons of giving publicity to Lawsuit in the main stream media once Rajiv returns from Canada.
There is a strong feeling in the Core Action Team that we should hold the idea of contacting the mainstream media about the lawsuit. The inclination is towards educating the ethnic and immigration pro media about the lawsuit first.
We can discuss the pros and cons of giving publicity to Lawsuit in the main stream media once Rajiv returns from Canada.
Originally posted by dilhem
Not True.
If nothing is done, and the LC backlog problem is solved then the I-140 and I-485 both will get worse, Not only I-485
You do not seem to understand. In this case you will need another lawyer, maybe yours, to file another class action for I-140 delays/backlogs.
You were given the arguments in PLAIN ENGLISH.
FILE CONCURRENT, so your time for I-140 is counting towards I-485. The DOL has allocated 100 million for LC backlog reduction. Under these circumstances only existing I-140 will "suffer".
Hope is that this time you will get it better.
Jharkhandi
Registered Users (C)
cinta,
Your argument doesn't help. Yes people are willing to go for 485 issue. However 140 issue is tough one esp in East Coast.
Please have some control over your posts if you do not want us to deviate from issues. We can certainly be more accomodating for views.
And yes let me repeat 140 is a issue. People always do not have option to file concurrent - sometimes employers do not let them do it either.
Now if you may allow - we can address 485 problem.
Hope you get the point from correct perspective.
Your argument doesn't help. Yes people are willing to go for 485 issue. However 140 issue is tough one esp in East Coast.
Please have some control over your posts if you do not want us to deviate from issues. We can certainly be more accomodating for views.
And yes let me repeat 140 is a issue. People always do not have option to file concurrent - sometimes employers do not let them do it either.
Now if you may allow - we can address 485 problem.
Hope you get the point from correct perspective.
UnFort_User
Registered Users (C)
Thank you Rajivji,
Every one of us had talked much about the delay and became upset to the core too. Nevertheless, nothing was done in the correct direction except interchanging some consolances.
You have done a constructive, efficient, progressive work.
All of our wishes and greetings to you.
GREAT SOUL YOU ARE.
Every one of us had talked much about the delay and became upset to the core too. Nevertheless, nothing was done in the correct direction except interchanging some consolances.
You have done a constructive, efficient, progressive work.
All of our wishes and greetings to you.
GREAT SOUL YOU ARE.
File case for I-140 also
Rajiv,
Thanks a lot for making this happen.
I have always appreciated your efforts in the past for all the petitions filed on behalf of ailing Employment based Community for labour certifications and I-485.
I think it is also the time to inform BCIS about the I-140 backlog. This is because, if I-485 is delayed and I-140 is approved, in that case, the person can change the jobs using AC-21. He can smell bit of freedom. But now, even the I-140 is taking 12-18 months to approve. In that case, I think we should also file a case for I-140 also.
Thanks for your work.
- Honeybee
Rajiv,
Thanks a lot for making this happen.
I have always appreciated your efforts in the past for all the petitions filed on behalf of ailing Employment based Community for labour certifications and I-485.
I think it is also the time to inform BCIS about the I-140 backlog. This is because, if I-485 is delayed and I-140 is approved, in that case, the person can change the jobs using AC-21. He can smell bit of freedom. But now, even the I-140 is taking 12-18 months to approve. In that case, I think we should also file a case for I-140 also.
Thanks for your work.
- Honeybee
Interesting Lawsuit
FYI (those who didnt know already)
http://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~stefanko/BCIS/
FYI (those who didnt know already)
http://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~stefanko/BCIS/
FYI Only
http://www.visalaw.com/immigrationportals.html
Would it be a good idea to make subscribers of other forums aware of this action? Please advise
http://www.visalaw.com/immigrationportals.html
Would it be a good idea to make subscribers of other forums aware of this action? Please advise
USCIS's response
Observation from the class action in illinois. It appears that the first step the USCIS takes is to adjudicate pending case and then argue that the issues are moot. They may adjudicate the I-485 application on the representative plaintiffs in the class action lawsuit filed on December 22, 2003. Afterwards, then, Attorney General may file a motion to dismiss arguing that the issues are moot.
Observation from the class action in illinois. It appears that the first step the USCIS takes is to adjudicate pending case and then argue that the issues are moot. They may adjudicate the I-485 application on the representative plaintiffs in the class action lawsuit filed on December 22, 2003. Afterwards, then, Attorney General may file a motion to dismiss arguing that the issues are moot.
Sessanga Charlesa
Registered Users (C)
Mr.Khanna I`m proud to let you know that I commend the steps you have taken.
I happen to be among those who have been victimized by BCIS.
I filled I-485 in 1998,up to this day I have not adjusted status,like other applicants I have been ordered to fill out the biographical form, and other notices, now BCIS is demanding that I should fill form AR-11 yet they have been corresponding with me on the same address.
Now I`m confused I don`t know what address I should give them.
Alltogether I got 7 notices demanding that i should reply otherwise loose my status.
I happen to be among those who have been victimized by BCIS.
I filled I-485 in 1998,up to this day I have not adjusted status,like other applicants I have been ordered to fill out the biographical form, and other notices, now BCIS is demanding that I should fill form AR-11 yet they have been corresponding with me on the same address.
Now I`m confused I don`t know what address I should give them.
Alltogether I got 7 notices demanding that i should reply otherwise loose my status.
urgent suggestions needed
Hi,
I have some questions ragarding the processing of I 140 and I485. My company has just started the GC application (They just gave the first set of adver. in early Dec). I am settled in Wyoming, so I expect my labour to be cleared very soon. I am not able to judge the processing times for I485 and I140. I dont know under which category would Wyoming fall and how long does that category take for the processing of I485 and I140 ??
Also, the next question is , once the company files for my I485 and I140,,when can I change my status ? , I want to pursue my MBA so I would have to go back to school again. SO the question is what would happen to my GC processing ?? When would be the safe period for me to apply to schools so that I dont jeopardize my GC processings ? Please reply ASAP as I need to get deferment from the school if that is what it takes to save my GC processing.
Hi,
I have some questions ragarding the processing of I 140 and I485. My company has just started the GC application (They just gave the first set of adver. in early Dec). I am settled in Wyoming, so I expect my labour to be cleared very soon. I am not able to judge the processing times for I485 and I140. I dont know under which category would Wyoming fall and how long does that category take for the processing of I485 and I140 ??
Also, the next question is , once the company files for my I485 and I140,,when can I change my status ? , I want to pursue my MBA so I would have to go back to school again. SO the question is what would happen to my GC processing ?? When would be the safe period for me to apply to schools so that I dont jeopardize my GC processings ? Please reply ASAP as I need to get deferment from the school if that is what it takes to save my GC processing.
- Status