Mr LA said:Hello all
When I call the US Attorney Office to find out who they assign to my case, what should I start ask him/her?
What do you say? I never called a US attorney before, and I never sue anyone before … any advice
I thank you all for your input ....
BaltoBalto said:If I am not mistaken. I filed in person in Baltimore and got everything back 6 days later in the mail. The clerk did say that the "in-house attorney" will need to look at my complaint since I am filing Pro Se.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Balto
AL11 said:I sent the letter to the FBI congressional office requesting that they expadite my name check. I don't have the address handy now, but I will find it tonight when I get home and post it.
Mr LA said:Hello all
When I call the US Attorney, what should I start ask him/her?
What do I say? I never called a US attorney before, and I never sue anyone before … any advice
I thank you all for your input ....
Glad to help.Emta said:Thanks a lot Kabi24. Your sample is very helpful.
Mr LA said:Hello all
When I call the US Attorney, what should I start ask him/her?
What do I say? I never called a US attorney before, and I never sue anyone before … any advice
I thank you all for your input ....
emachineman said:i have my citizenship oath ceremony on june 14th.
thanks to 1447b
i am about to dismiss my case. i was called by the us attorney's office (local) and that dude said to me.
This case that you have filed...uh...i am a stranger to this type of case. he says, "you probably know more about this type of case".
he doesnt even know that i have gotten my oath letter.
when i tell him i have and i will drop the case after the oath and getting my letter. he says..."I hate it when they (INS, DHS, FBI etc.)dont tell me stuff even though i'm representing them in this case...but its typical."
but he was a very cool guy;
i just thought i'd share.
Mr LA said:Cajack,
We all here for each other, make sure someone helped us before we help you. I just wish we all be there for each other...... are you from Cali Jack
In my case he is also a defendant. And I'm not the first one who did it.AL11 said:Actually the US attorney for Northern California is not a defendant, he is the lawyer of the defendands. if you received a confirmation, then I think you should be fine.
Definitely a good sign, It makes me wonder though. did they lose the fingerprints you gave them before?! and why some people get 2nd FP and some don't even if they might have applied at the same time!Emta said:Today when I came home I've found invitation for fingerprints in my mailbox. It has been sent on June, 5th from local USCIS office, one week after district director got my complaint. I believe it's not a coincidece, they finally looked into my papers. I had fingerprins following N-400 two years ago. I hope it is a good sign.
Don't worry about it. As long as you served him, you should be fine. They'll sort it out.Emta said:Hm. Kevin Ryan, U.S. Attorney for Northern California is one of my defendants. So, he has been served together with other defendants and I've already got a confirmation reciept from his office. I've put him as a defendant following an example on another (russian language) immigration forum. The author of this example had a quick success with his §1447 (b) lawsuite -> naturalization. Do you think sending him summons + all docs as a defendant is enough?
Will also follow your advice not to wait for all return reciepts.
Thank you!
Here in western washington state the court's service of Summons information booklet indicate that you should use a third party, on the other hand the proof of service sheet has a spot for people who served the summons themselves... so it's a weird thing. i personally did it using USPS. But i saw this other case where the plaintiff did it himself and had the US attorney front desk stamp a "received" mention on the proof of service. check my attachements out...ejb2k said:Can I serve the US attorney myself, or I need a third person to do this? Thanks!
By rules (either Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Local Court Rules), you must not serve yourself because you are a party to the lawsuit. This is to prevent people getting into fights and getting hurt. Nobody likes being sued and people get very upset when they get served (normally in civil and family law cases).ejb2k said:Buggin and others,
Can I serve the US attorney myself, or I need a third person to do this?
Thanks!
This is very funny! This is a good example to those who don't feel confident about filing lawsuits. You see, we can do a very good job and can kick their butts.emachineman said:i have my citizenship oath ceremony on june 14th.
thanks to 1447b
i am about to dismiss my case. i was called by the us attorney's office (local) and that dude said to me.
This case that you have filed...uh...i am a stranger to this type of case. he says, "you probably know more about this type of case".
he doesnt even know that i have gotten my oath letter.
when i tell him i have and i will drop the case after the oath and getting my letter. he says..."I hate it when they (INS, DHS, FBI etc.)dont tell me stuff even though i'm representing them in this case...but its typical."
but he was a very cool guy;
i just thought i'd share.
khalafah2000 said:i haven't received your response. Can you please give me the FBI congressional office address?
Emta said:In my case he is also a defendant. And I'm not the first one who did it.
Today when I came home I've found invitation for fingerprints in my mailbox. It has been sent on June, 5th from local USCIS office, one week after district director got my complaint. I believe it's not a coincidece, they finally looked into my papers. I had fingerprins following N-400 two years ago. I hope it is a good sign.
That was advice from one successfull applicant in our district. she has got her case resolved really fast and believes it was because she sued US Attorney as well. In complaint there is a following wording about reason:Suzy977 said:Just curious: Why the US Attorney is a defendant in your case?
Defendant Kevin Ryan is the U.S. Attorney General for the Northern District of California. Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §1103, he is charged with controlling determination of all issues of law pertaining to immigration and the representing of United States of America in various legal matters before this Court.