nickoxx
Member
nickoxx
Ok, got it.
Now I reread your document "preparing_uscis_suit" and I have a few questions:
1) Who is AUSA? I guess that USA is US Attroney, but I didn't get who is AUSA.
2) Is there any guarantee that CIS will adjudicate your case within 30 days after US Attorney told them to do so?
3) Before you dismiss your case (in order to allow CIS adjudicate the case) will you get any confirmation that USA and CIS agreed to adjudicate the case in 30 days?
4) I see you can refile your case to the court if CIS won't adjudicate your case within 30 days, but it sounds like vicious circle. I mean you file for a hearing then they tell you they will do it within 30 days then they fail then you again file for a hearing etc.
1. I think, this is the same.
2. I hope so. I've seen people's posts about even 1-2 weeks.
3. Look my attachment lawsuit_prep_11.jpg, section "The Busiest ...", where it says about some kinda stipulation/comment which you can ask USA. I think, they need to provide you with some sort of e-mail/paper confirmation. THIS IS THE MOST TRICKY PART (in my opinion).
4. What about paying the fee, again? If USCIS withing 30 days calls you for another interview > "no decision/answer presented again" > 120 days' game start again > filling with District court again?
I personally think, 3-4 the toughest ones. It's like a lottery 50:50, unless you're 100% proof that one's case is solid.
Otherwise, USCIS may deny, then you can apply for another officer's adjudicating > appeal to the court (if another officer's project falls through as well).
In my case, I want to get a clear answer: "yes" or "no", since if we continue on limbo, my wife pretty soon will be applying based on 5-year rule. So, I want to sort it out, otherwise, what's the point of submitting another application next fall, if the current (3-year) is still "up in the air"?