lvla, here you go:
10. Some cases from my district court (Northern District of Texas). The quoted documents are MTD denials. Please see if they are properly quoted and used here.
Replace Tx. with Tex. The rest looks fine.
15. Should I point out that my PD was current and visa was available from June 2007 until November 2007, but my case was not processed due to 1. pending FBI namecheck until Oct 2007; 2. USCIS inaction from Oct to Nov 07. If so, will USCIS argue that since they can not process AOS when visa number is only available, my waiting period should only be considered as during the time my PD was current?
You may want to leave out this part if this shows that USCIS inaction was only for one month. You can mention that your case has been pending because of NC and now after the new NC policy, USCIS has itself admitted that NC was never a requirement for AOS adjudication. You want to add the references to new policy (NC > 180 days, if AOS otherwise approvable should be approved) and then how USCIS announced that it will adjudicate all qualifying AOS application by mid-March 2008.
18. Should I elaborate here that my name check was pending for 2 years and I sought help from senators, etc. (eventually FBI responded to First Lady's inquiry)
Yeah, by all means. You spent two years in just NC which now only has to be pending for 180 days before the adjudication can be completed. You can document your efforts saying that you tried every avenue to get your application adjudicated and NC was quoated to you as the reason for not adjudicating your AOS, so pursued all avenues available to you to find the status of NC or expedite it.
32. As mentioned in my previous post, USCIS was messing with my case after I faxed them a I-485 adjudication request. They sent me a letter telling me they updated my address and attached someone else's EAD expedite requests. I called TSC this Monday and was told my address was still correct. I called again today just to confirm and got same answer. I couldn't find out what else they might have done to my case though. Do you think it's ok to include this event in the complaint (the USCIS letter attachment contains someone else's information. is this ok)? I kinda want to show how stupid USCIS can be.
Yes, you can mention that your believe that USCIS was not able to match your request to your file and you are afraid that it may have mishandled your case. You can redact(/black out) the private information and put a little note saying "information masked for privacy reasons".
37. Successful cases in my district court. However, seems it was stated in the Goldschmidt v. U.S. Atty. Gen. case that "Judges of this Court have consistently held that persons who have filed immigration related applications have a clear right to have the discretionary adjudication of their applications completed within a reasonable period of time." What do you think about this? While in 38 (this is from Jefkorn's template and I didn't change any quoted cases), other courts say "non-discretionary duty".
That could be a typo. I haven't looked at the case but court can only compel USCIS to perform non-discretionary duty owed to plaintiffs which includes adjudication. Also change Tx. to Tex. in case citations.
Last but not least, should I explicitly state the visa number unavailability under INJURY TO PLAINTIFF that due to the delay I am affected by retrogression in Dec 2007 and now AGAIN?
Definitely, accentuate the injury and make the possibility of waiting for an unknown period of time in abseence of a visa number prominent. You can mention that because of previous visa number retrogression, you are afraid that you will miss the this opportunity to get your AOS adjudicated if the USCIS doesn't act promptly.
And, should I add DHS to defendants in regard of the visa problem?
I think you meant DOS, you already have DHS as the first named defendant. You want to add DOS(Dept. of State, Ms. Rice) because of the visa retrogression issue.
Note: I just received a letter back from the CIS Ombudsman saying they have contacted USCIS and asked me to wait for 45 days. I have modified the corresponding content in the complaint.
You don't need to wait for 45 days for Ombudsman's response. It's not going to be useful.