Yes, I did wear a suit. The AUSA didn't show up. I think someone from Homeland Security showed up (didn't wear suit) and explained that visa # was not available. I took your advice and said the "the visa # is not available in EB2 Chinese is factually incorrect. And even if it is correct, case shouldn't be dismissed due to unavailibility of the visa #. " I borrowed a lot of fancy legal words from Lazycis and read those in the court.
I guess I went on and on... When I start to cite authorities, the judge interupted me and said " I am not going to make a ruling today. But I will not dismiss your case either." And then the judge ordered the defendants to gather their facts within 4 weeks. And we have another status hearing 8 weeks later.
The person who represent the defendants today said that I should have served every defendants when I file first amended complaint. I don't know if that is true. I served only the AUSA and the new defendant. I will probably check on the relevant regulations.
I guess I went on and on... When I start to cite authorities, the judge interupted me and said " I am not going to make a ruling today. But I will not dismiss your case either." And then the judge ordered the defendants to gather their facts within 4 weeks. And we have another status hearing 8 weeks later.
The person who represent the defendants today said that I should have served every defendants when I file first amended complaint. I don't know if that is true. I served only the AUSA and the new defendant. I will probably check on the relevant regulations.
good luck. do you need to wear a suit ?
Last edited by a moderator: