Anyone with a lawsuit against USCIS or thinking about a lawsuit (Merged)

The procedure flow has been confusing to me, is it like below? Is it in correct or wrong order or missing any steps? assume no MTD is involved. Thank you!

1. file lawsuit ->
2. AUSA files Motion to Extend xx days (might be multiple extension) - if it seems endless, then ->
3. plaintiff files MSJ ->
4. court denies ->
5. plaintiff files Discovery ->
6. both plaintiff and AUSA file Joint Status Report ->
7. pretrial hearing ->
8. trial - if lost ->
9. appeal
 
thank you for your quik answer but now i m not in my city i m in vavaction so i shout email susa the send me any paper to sign it my email and i will sing it and fax it can i do that

Email has been the primary form of correspondences between me and the AUSA. The AUSA in my case was pretty good in responding to my queries and normally i had been getting replies from him in less than 2 days.

Just email your AUSA and let him/her email you the document to sign. Once you have done that, either scan it and email it or fax it back.
 
How are the courts in silicon valley ( as far as WOM ) is concerned ?

I would assume that the judges in bay area will be more immigrant friendly.
 
lawsuit steps

The procedure flow has been confusing to me, is it like below? Is it in correct or wrong order or missing any steps? assume no MTD is involved. Thank you!

1. file lawsuit ->
2. AUSA files Motion to Extend xx days (might be multiple extension) - if it seems endless, then ->
3. plaintiff files MSJ ->
4. court denies ->
5. plaintiff files Discovery ->
6. both plaintiff and AUSA file Joint Status Report ->
7. pretrial hearing ->
8. trial - if lost ->
9. appeal

It's not that simple, some steps can be in a different order.

1. file lawsuit ->
2. plaintiff files Discovery request ->
3. AUSA files Motion to Extend xx days (might be multiple extension) - if it seems endless, then -> Do not agree to future extensions, file opposition.
4. AUSA files reply/MTD

... multiple scenarios
a) Judge orders JSR/conference -> file JSR report/attent conference
b) No JSR

5. plaintiff files MSJ ->
... multiple scenarios
a) court denies plaintiff's MSJ but assumes jurisdiction -> continue discovery, file subpoena
b) court grants plaintiff's MSJ -> victory
c) USCIS approves application -> victory
d) court dismisses complaint/denies MSJ again -> appeal

There will be no trial as there are no disputable facts usually. Hearings are also rare.
 
IMP namecheck bill introduced in HOUSE!

I apologize for the cross post but this is an important development that everyone stuck in namecheck must be aware of.

An important bill was introduced in the house today that forces the FBI to end all namecheck backlogs. This is a very short bill and it has just one provision - to end namecheck backlogs. This is exacly the kind of bill we were looking for.
This is different from the bill that was passed in Senate recently.

The important thing for all of us:
WRITE TO YOUR REPRESENTATIVE AND ASK HIM/HER TO SUPPORT THIS BILL.

Unless you write, this bill is not going to pass - please do so immediately.
You can find out who your representative is and for instructions on how to contact him/her here:

http://www.house.gov/writerep/

Please post this message in all immigration groups you are member of.

PDF version: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_bills&docid=f:h3828ih.txt.pdf

HR 3828:
(a) In General- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall jointly provide to the Committees on the Judiciary, Homeland Security, and Appropriations of the House of Representatives, and the Committees on the Judiciary, Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and Appropriations of the Senate, a plan for ensuring that, within 18 months of the date of enactment of this Act, the National Name Check Program, administered by the Records Management Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), will no longer have any requested name checks from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) in backlog status.

(b) Elements of Plan- The plan shall include the following elements:

(1) Necessary improvements to computer systems so that all records may be transmitted, maintained, and checked electronically, and whether it is possible to centralize this information in a single searchable database.

(2) How the FBI will improve communications with USCIS to ensure the maximum efficiency in processing name check requests from that agency.

(3) Security upgrades in transferring information between the FBI and USCIS to ensure the privacy of any individual receiving a name check.

(4) Long-term fixes that will prevent any future backlog, including a risk management analysis of changes that can be made to streamline the process and policies for obtaining FBI name checks in connection with applications and petitions for immigration benefits.

(5) An estimate of the funding required to complete the operation by the required date along with an estimate of any possible fee increases.

(6) A study regarding the best practices in assessing the level of risk presented by applicants. The study will determine whether the current risk assessment process should be modified.

(7) A report of the number of applications and petitions that remain pending at USCIS more than 6 months after the name check results have been returned from the FBI to USCIS.

(c) Effect of Backlog On and After 18 Months of the Date of Enactment of This Act- Beginning 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the National Name Check Program is not authorized to have any file in backlog status. After that date, any name check request from USCIS held in the possession of the National Name Check Program for longer than 6 months--

(1) will be referred to the Secretary of Homeland Security, who shall adjudicate interim benefits in connection with the application with which the FBI name check was requested, unless the Secretary certifies there is reasonable cause to suspect that the applicant poses a threat to national security, otherwise poses a threat to the United States, or has broken United States immigration law; and

(2) the name check fee shall be fully refunded.

(d) Backlog- For purposes of this section, the term `backlog' means, with respect to a file sent to the National Name Check Program from USCIS, that the file has been pending under the jurisdiction of the Justice Department for longer than 6 months.

END
 
All,
The federal rules regarding service of summons state "Service may be effected by any person who is not a party". From the context, this refers to all forms of service, not just service in person.
So how should I serve the defendants and USA? I'm thinking of asking a friend to do it.
Thanks,
Chris
 
If you have a friend who is willing to help, great. Technically when you serve by certified mail an USPS employee performs the service so it's not required to use a friend if you serve by mail.
 
From The Rooftops!

Case Was Approved Yesterday. Waiting For Oath Ceremony To Be Scheduled. Thank You Too All Of Youl. I Was On The Verge Of Suing. Wont' Need To Anymore. Hope You All Have Great Results!:)
 
If you have a friend who is willing to help, great. Technically when you serve by certified mail an USPS employee performs the service so it's not required to use a friend if you serve by mail.

Thanks, if I serve it myself by certified mail and the court raises an issue, is there a precedent I can cite to show that service by USPS employee is OK?
-Chris
 
Serve the summon to AUSA

Thanks, if I serve it myself by certified mail and the court raises an issue, is there a precedent I can cite to show that service by USPS employee is OK?
-Chris

By myself as they were in the same building where I went. They did signed on my copy of summon that "received". Are you saying it is invalid ?
Also, I got the name of the judge. Is there a way to find out if he is immigrants friendly ?
 
Thanks, if I serve it myself by certified mail and the court raises an issue, is there a precedent I can cite to show that service by USPS employee is OK?
-Chris

Chris,
I asked exactly the same question at the clerk's office when I filed :) The clerk told me to read the rules. I answered that it is not clear from the rules whether this will be a valid service. She just smiled at me at told me not to worry and serve by certified mail. So to be on the safe side, take your friend with you when you go to the post office, but if it's too much trouble, just do it yourself.
 
I've been for the most part a silent reader of this forum, which helped me a lot.
Today I finally got naturalized!
N400 PD 2/14/2005
FP 3/17/2005
N652 6/23/2005
1447(b) 7/12/2007
Oath ceremony 10/19/2007

I am in Maryland and filed 1447(b) with the attorney's help (for $1000). I would probably still be waiting if I would not come across this forum. Thank you very much for all the info.
 
Congratulations!

I've been for the most part a silent reader of this forum, which helped me a lot.
Today I finally got naturalized!
N400 PD 2/14/2005
FP 3/17/2005
N652 6/23/2005
1447(b) 7/12/2007
Oath ceremony 10/19/2007

I am in Maryland and filed 1447(b) with the attorney's help (for $1000). I would probably still be waiting if I would not come across this forum. Thank you very much for all the info.

Congratulations to you. That is excellent. I was approved yesterday and was on the verge of filing suit too. Which Attorney did you use. The ones i called when i thought about using an Attorney were going to charge me about 5-7 thousand dollars.
 
I used Caroline R. Ngoubene 301-738-6909. I don't know what the fees are right now, but in July it was $1000 plus court fees.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Another Question

I used Caroline R. Ngoubene 301-738-6909. I don't know what the fees are right now, but in July it was $1000 plus court fees.

What was the oath ceremony like? They hold it at the Baltimore office right?what time was it scheduled for and did it take a long time?
Also, how much notice did you get before the ceremony? Two weeks, a month, more?...
 
Mostly Chinese,Indians , Russian & folks from middle eastern

Tracking all these WOM filings it appears the aggrieved parties are mostly Chinese,Indian,Russian etc. It adds to my theory that the 'stuck-in-namecheck' disease affects mostly male applicants from these countries ( my primary source of information is from immigration portal, immigration voice, murthy forum and also my co-workers and others in the bay area companies ). There may be persons suffering from other countries , but i think that will be an exception.
 
It's not that simple, some steps can be in a different order.

1. file lawsuit ->
2. plaintiff files Discovery request ->
3. AUSA files Motion to Extend xx days (might be multiple extension) - if it seems endless, then -> Do not agree to future extensions, file opposition.
4. AUSA files reply/MTD

... multiple scenarios
a) Judge orders JSR/conference -> file JSR report/attent conference
b) No JSR

5. plaintiff files MSJ ->
... multiple scenarios
a) court denies plaintiff's MSJ but assumes jurisdiction -> continue discovery, file subpoena
b) court grants plaintiff's MSJ -> victory
c) USCIS approves application -> victory
d) court dismisses complaint/denies MSJ again -> appeal

There will be no trial as there are no disputable facts usually. Hearings are also rare.

So it's better to try a Discovery before an MSJ? Or is just an equally effective alternative?
-Chris
 
Top