I am sorry, I meant 2006. My understanding is, the finger print expires after 15 months. In my wife's case, it is just a year over after her finger print.
If her FP were not expired, it is more suspicious, but it may be just another USCIS "mishap".
I am sorry, I meant 2006. My understanding is, the finger print expires after 15 months. In my wife's case, it is just a year over after her finger print.
aryin,
Can you tell me who is your judge? I did not see MTD denied in your district recently in AOS case, but I've seen at least 3 1447(b) (Mostovoi, Alhamedi, Al-Farisi) cases where MTD was denied and FBI was instructed to complete NC in 30 days or so. You can use those cases. Also you can use other cases from your Circuit (i.e. Koren v Chertoff).
I-485 filed in NJ in Oct 2005
Interview May 2006
Name check still pending
WOM April 2007
60 day Extension filed by AUSA in June 2007
MTD filed Aug 2007
4 arguments used in MTD:
1- Lack of jurisdiction
2- Only USCIS has the right/pwer to adjudicate case
3- No where in the law it is mentioned the time by when an adjustment of status must be completed
4- permenent residency is a privilege and not a right
1-Use favorable opinions from your circuit (PAED, NJD has a couple)
Check this decision regarding jurisdictional bar of 1252 (INA 242).
http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/995053.txt
Check also this decision (pages 23-25):
http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/043837p.pdf
"We must also ask whether the action at issue here was discretionary. It is important to distinguish carefully between a denial of an application to adjust status, and a determination that an immigrant is legally ineligible for adjustment of status. This distinction is central to the question of subject-matter jurisdiction, and is easy to elide. Indeed, such distinctions are crucial to administrative law generally; the framework of judicial review of agency action that has evolved over the past half-century is grounded in a sharp distinction between decisions committed to agency discretion, and decisions, whether “ministerial” or “purely legal,” governed directly by the applicable statute or regulation. See, e.g., Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55 (2004); Webster v. Doe, 486 U.S. 592 (1988). Whatever the label, our caselaw distinguishes between actions which an agency official may freely decide to take or not to take, and those which he is obligated by law to take or not to take. In the case of adjustment of status, an eligible immigrant may have his application denied within the discretion of the agency. But the immigrant’s eligibility itself is determined by statute. To treat all denials of adjustment as discretionary, even when based on eligibility determinations that are plainly matters of law, is to fundamentally misunderstand the relationship between the executive and the judiciary."
2-USCIS also has a duty to adjudicate a case
Check this case
http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/033634p.pdf
"But the Attorney General’s power is not unlimited, and must be exercised consistently with the intent of the statute."
3-So what? They still have to comply with 5 usc 555(b)
4-Agree, but you are asking for adjudication, not approval
Use Accardi v. Shaughnessy, 347 U.S. 260 (1954) (holding that a reviewable legal standard can be set forth in an agency regulation and that an alien has a right for his/her application to be considered).
Talked to the First Circuit Court clerk yesterday. Apparently the appeal goes before circuit judges as soon as appellees reply is filed if neither party requested oral arguments. My AUSA did not request oral arguments. So the judges are reviewing my case at this time and I can expect the decision in September-October. If you believe in God, pray for me, otherwise wish me luck.
i applied for citizenship in sep.2005 they put interview in April 2005 but they
descheduled interview. i went several times to immigration office, i send a letter to a congress man but there is nothing. now i want to sue them if someone had this situation or know about it please help me about information and can i win the case?
best regards
Talked to the First Circuit Court clerk yesterday. Apparently the appeal goes before circuit judges as soon as appellees reply is filed if neither party requested oral arguments. My AUSA did not request oral arguments. So the judges are reviewing my case at this time and I can expect the decision in September-October. If you believe in God, pray for me, otherwise wish me luck.
aryin,
Can you tell me who is your judge? I did not see MTD denied in your district recently in AOS case, but I've seen at least 3 1447(b) (Mostovoi, Alhamedi, Al-Farisi) cases where MTD was denied and FBI was instructed to complete NC in 30 days or so. You can use those cases. Also you can use other cases from your Circuit (i.e. Koren v Chertoff).
GC-Pending,
I am Marylander myself and my case was also MTD-ed after several "extensions" by AUSA
Don't give up,
File an opposing motion and include latest consideration of lazyCIS that
FBI violated procedures of delay (if your FIOPA is without records).
I am in the same boat
-----------------------------------
04/04/2003 - RD I-485
01/19/2006 -last 3rd FP
10/09/2004 -Transfer to Baltimore
08/10/2005 -Interview -Name Check pending announced
2004-2007- Contacted USCIS (Infopass and by phone, issued various non-working T-numbers, contacted Senators, wrote FBI,got "no record FIOPA)
12/22/2006 -WoM filed
04/11/2007-Amended Complain filed (FBI head included)
06/19/07 -Motion for Extension by AUSA (1 week granted)
06/26/07 -Motion to Extension by AUSA ( 2 days granted)
06/28/07- Motion to Dismiss "Lack of Jurisdiction".
Defendant supplied court with Michael McCannon boilder template and Declaration of Greg Collett
07/18/07 - Responded to MTD
08/10/2007 - MTD Granted by Judge (based on "other" case decision)
08/20/2007- Filed Motion to Reconsider ("other" judge similar motion was overturned by Appeal court)
Lazycis, could you post Alhamedi and Al-Farisi's cases again?
Thanks
This might be off the topic, but I am desperate, hopefully someone could give me some advices.
Finally, the Judge rules on my case, favoring me. But it is not the final ruling, it is just a recommendation and the government could object before Sep. 17th. The bad thing is my Chinese passport is expiring in Feb. 8, 2008. I don't really want to submit my passport to renew (it will take around a month to get it back) because I hope if I get the approval notice, I will be able to get it stamped. Also, I might need to go to Asia for a business trip (I really want to do that) in Mid-October. My dilema is I don't know if i can come back with Advanced Parole on a passport which does not have 6 months validation on it. Because I have to prepare for the worst that if I won't get greencard before the trip. Should I just go ahead to renew my passport? It will be expensive because I have to travel to San Francisco soon which means airline tickets will be expensive. So, anyone here have any experience on a "almost" expired passport, travel with Advanced Parole? If I receive the green card before that, will that be ok?
This might be off the topic, but I am desperate, hopefully someone could give me some advices.
Finally, the Judge rules on my case, favoring me. But it is not the final ruling, it is just a recommendation and the government could object before Sep. 17th. The bad thing is my Chinese passport is expiring in Feb. 8, 2008. I don't really want to submit my passport to renew (it will take around a month to get it back) because I hope if I get the approval notice, I will be able to get it stamped. Also, I might need to go to Asia for a business trip (I really want to do that) in Mid-October. My dilema is I don't know if i can come back with Advanced Parole on a passport which does not have 6 months validation on it. Because I have to prepare for the worst that if I won't get greencard before the trip. Should I just go ahead to renew my passport? It will be expensive because I have to travel to San Francisco soon which means airline tickets will be expensive. So, anyone here have any experience on a "almost" expired passport, travel with Advanced Parole? If I receive the green card before that, will that be ok?
This might be off the topic, but I am desperate, hopefully someone could give me some advices.
Finally, the Judge rules on my case, favoring me. But it is not the final ruling, it is just a recommendation and the government could object before Sep. 17th. The bad thing is my Chinese passport is expiring in Feb. 8, 2008. I don't really want to submit my passport to renew (it will take around a month to get it back) because I hope if I get the approval notice, I will be able to get it stamped. Also, I might need to go to Asia for a business trip (I really want to do that) in Mid-October. My dilema is I don't know if i can come back with Advanced Parole on a passport which does not have 6 months validation on it. Because I have to prepare for the worst that if I won't get greencard before the trip. Should I just go ahead to renew my passport? It will be expensive because I have to travel to San Francisco soon which means airline tickets will be expensive. So, anyone here have any experience on a "almost" expired passport, travel with Advanced Parole? If I receive the green card before that, will that be ok?