Anyone with a lawsuit against USCIS or thinking about a lawsuit (Merged)

Hi,

Can anyone point to me the place where I can find a cover sheet for the WOM?.Is this something that I need to get from the court??. This for Northern district of california (san francisco)

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's with the Pro se package

hadenuf said:
Hi,

Can anyone point to me the place where I can find a cover sheet for the WOM?.Is this something that I need to get from the court??. This for Northern district of california (san francisco)

Thanks


Hello there.

It's usaully is in a Pro Se package which you probably has already picked one up at the court house.

~C
 
Use lawyer or DIY to file lawsuit (1447b) aginst FBI?

Hi guys,

Wondering how many of you hire a lawyer to file the lawsuit against the FBI and USCIS? Normally how much they charge for this kind of case? that's probably the last resort to get the case speed up so use a lawyer might be helpful unless it's really easy to DIY?

Thanks a bunch!
ED
 
Portuch said:
My Timeline:
DO: Los Angeles
Priority date: 03/25/05
Interview : 04/04/06
Lawsuit 1447b: Filed on 08/09/06 (127 days after my interview)
US Attorney was served on 08/11/06
Answer due 10/10/06
Oath letter: ???
Oath date: ??/??/????

Today, I received a document called: "ORDER SETTING STATUS AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE" on 10/30/06 from my district court. The respondent is the US Attorney General (Alberto Gonzales). Other defendants like Secretary of DHS, Director of USCIS and Director of FBI are not shown as respondents.

Does anyone receive something similiar?

Does it mean they are bring me to court?

Does it mean only the US Attorney General responded to my case? The rest are still in process? Do I still have chance to win my case and become citizen?

Thanks in advance for any opinions.
Portuch
I do not know the answer to your questions but I noticed that you are in LA. The ACLU in LA has filed a class action lawsuit against immigration on behalf of immigrant with delayed applications due to name check. Why don't you call them and join them in that venue.
 
Victory for 1447

Dear All,
First of all I want to thank this great forum: without it I would be waiting for another 1.5 year, or may be more. Publicus is a Hero.

As of yesterday I became a citizen, filed my 1447 on August 2. Ceremony was fine, lot of people (1200), 300 of them (25%, not 1%) were in the 'name check' crap. They told it openly.

Just want to encourage anyone who is hesitant to file a complaint - do it, don't waste a minute.

Thanks again and Good luck to everyone.
 
Hello Friends,

About a month after sending "Notice of legal action", I have filed the lawsuit for my delayed I485. Summons were sent out today. I hope every thing goes as expected. I am little worried as I have seen more incidents of some out of the way behavior by some of the AUSA.

For the benefit of others in the same boat, I have posted preparation details and filing experience here:
http://www.immigrationportal.com/showthread.php?t=224983
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Urgent Help Needed with serving US Attorney

I filed my 1447 on Aug 28th, I hired a process server to serve teh US attorney, I had 4 defendants, so, the process server served teh US attoney copies, one copy for each defendant, and gave me 4 notarized documents that look like the following:
Case No......
Plaintiff: ...... Adress.........
Hayyyoot
Palintiff
vs.
Alberto Gonzales, US Attornet General, Michaell Chertoff, Emilio Gonzales et al
Defendants,
----------.... (name of server).......being duley sworn deposes and says, That at all times herin affiant was and is a citezen of teh United States, over 18 years of age, licensed to serve civil process in teh State of Nevada under license no. ....., and not a party to or interestead in teh proceeding in which teh affidavit is made. The affiant received FOUR copies of a summons in a Civil Action:
Petition for Hearing on Naturalization application under 8 U.S.C. / 1447(b)
on teh 28th day of August, 2006, and served the same on teh 28th day of August, 2006 at 4:44PM by:
1- Delivering and leaving a copy with the defendant Micharl Chertoff, Secretary of US DHS (W/ J. Pelt...., employee) at: 333 Las Vegas Blvd South, room 5000, Las Vegas, NV 89101.
Subscribed and sworn to before me ..........(notary)
---------------------------------
The process server has provided me 4 documents, one with teh name of each defendant.
HOWEVER, I send this to court by mail, and it appeared today on Pacer as summons returned executed to the defendants, as you see, teh server didn't mention teh US Attorney in his affidavit, he only listed teh address of teh US attorney, and teh name of his employee, now, teh court has wrong summons, what should I do?
Should I just contact teh court and request to remove those documents from their system and serve teh US Attorney by certified mail?
Whay should I do? please please give me your seggestions.
Thanks
 
help please

Hi everybody:

A friend of mine wants to pursue on his I-485 via the US first lady's office and president's office as some of the members on this forum did.

Can any one provide me on the phone numbers of these two offices. I appreciate your help. Thanks a lot.
 
hayyyoot said:
I filed my 1447 on Aug 28th, I hired a process server to serve teh US attorney, I had 4 defendants, so, the process server served teh US attoney copies, one copy for each defendant, and gave me 4 notarized documents that look like the following:
Case No......
Plaintiff: ...... Adress.........
Hayyyoot
Palintiff
vs.
Alberto Gonzales, US Attornet General, Michaell Chertoff, Emilio Gonzales et al
Defendants,
----------.... (name of server).......being duley sworn deposes and says, That at all times herin affiant was and is a citezen of teh United States, over 18 years of age, licensed to serve civil process in teh State of Nevada under license no. ....., and not a party to or interestead in teh proceeding in which teh affidavit is made. The affiant received FOUR copies of a summons in a Civil Action:
Petition for Hearing on Naturalization application under 8 U.S.C. / 1447(b)
on teh 28th day of August, 2006, and served the same on teh 28th day of August, 2006 at 4:44PM by:
1- Delivering and leaving a copy with the defendant Micharl Chertoff, Secretary of US DHS (W/ J. Pelt...., employee) at: 333 Las Vegas Blvd South, room 5000, Las Vegas, NV 89101.
Subscribed and sworn to before me ..........(notary)
---------------------------------
The process server has provided me 4 documents, one with teh name of each defendant.
HOWEVER, I send this to court by mail, and it appeared today on Pacer as summons returned executed to the defendants, as you see, teh server didn't mention teh US Attorney in his affidavit, he only listed teh address of teh US attorney, and teh name of his employee, now, teh court has wrong summons, what should I do?
Should I just contact teh court and request to remove those documents from their system and serve teh US Attorney by certified mail?
Whay should I do? please please give me your seggestions.
Thanks

I would call the clerck first. Maybe it doesn't hirt to serve the US atty a second time this time by cretified mail.
 
Oath Ceremony

Just wonder or anyone experienced it, how many guest I can take with me to Oath ceremony? There is any restriction on number of guest allowed? Please answer me because I have oath schedule for tomorrow.

Also could anyone send me format to upgrade I-130 petition since I will be US citizen by tomrorow.

Thanks all
 
Filing 1447B next week - Need Help!!!

As I am gearing to file first thing next week; can someone advise me, if I Publicus's initial methods and procedures are valid, or along the 300 pager forum, there are key updates logged somewhere. I would greatly appreciate your help. Thanks in advance.
 
Where to file for Upgrade!!

Need urgent help, where to file for upgrade I-130? I have to send upgrade request to NVC or service center where I filed I-130? Sametime I can send I-129F for K-3 visa, am I right?

After tomorrow oath, i can send upgrade request for I-130 (whrre NVC or service center) and I-129F application for K-3 visa with copy of old I-130 and I-129F, am i right.

I need urgent response. Thanks All
 
TheRock20148 said:
Need urgent help, where to file for upgrade I-130? I have to send upgrade request to NVC or service center where I filed I-130?

Send the upgrade request to the same place you filed the original I-130.
So for example, if you filed your original I130 to NVC, then send the upgrade request to NVC.


Sametime I can send I-129F for K-3 visa, am I right?
right.

After tomorrow oath, i can send upgrade request for I-130 (whrre NVC or service center) and I-129F application for K-3 visa with copy of old I-130 and I-129F, am i right.

you are right

I need urgent response. Thanks All
 
Thanks Denver

Well, I did filled I-130 with vermont service center, do I will mail upgrade application/request to vermont. But for I-129F I guess we have to send it to Chicago office instead of service center as per instruction on I-129F form.

Denver or anyone else, could anyone inform me, how many guest or if any guest I can take with me to Oath ceremony tomorrow.

Thanks,
 
National Name Check Program—Frequently Asked Questions

How long will it take for my name check to be completed?

The length of time it takes for a name check to be completed varies from name to name. Normally, a name is submitted by an agency, such as the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), on a data tape. The National Name Check Program (NNCP) receives over 62,000 name checks every week, with over 27,000 coming from USCIS on a weekly basis. When a data tape comes in, the names on the tape are electronically checked against the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Universal Index (UNI). The searches seek all instances of the individual's name appearing in both main files and reference files. A main file name is that of an individual who is, himself/herself, the subject of an FBI investigation, whereas a reference is someone whose name appears in an FBI investigation. References may be associates, conspirators, or witnesses.

The majority of name checks submitted on a data tape are electronically checked and returned to the submitting agency as having "No Record" within 48-72 hours. A "No Record" indicates that the FBI's UNI database contains no identifiable information regarding a particular individual. Duplicate submissions (i.e., identically spelled names with identical dates of birth submitted within the last 120 days) are not checked, and the duplicate findings are returned immediately to the submitting agency.

A secondary manual name search conducted within 30-60 days usually identifies additional requests as having a "No Record." The remaining name checks (usually about 10% of the name checks originally submitted) are identified as possibly being the subject of an FBI record. At that point, the FBI record must be retrieved and reviewed. If the record is available in the FBI's electronic record keeping system, it can be reviewed quickly. If not, the relevant information must be retrieved from an existing paper record. Review of this information determines whether the information is positively identified with the name check request. If the information is not identified with the request, the request is closed as a "No Record," and the requesting agency is notified as such.

The average time required to retrieve and review an FBI record for possible information related to a name check request is case specific—it depends on the number of files an analyst must obtain (which is dictated by the number of "hits" on a name), the location and availability of those files, and the amount of information contained in a file. If a file is stored locally, an analyst will be able to obtain the file within a matter of days. If a file is located in a field office or other FBI location, the applicable information must be requested from that location. There are over 265 different FBI locations that could house information pertinent to a name check request. If a file is electronically available, an analyst will have immediate access to that file. Additionally, once an analyst receives the file, or the pertinent information contained in a file, the analyst must review it for possible information related to the name check request.

Many times, the delay associated with the processing of the remaining name checks is not the actual time it takes to process a name check, but the time it takes for an analyst to get to the name check request in order to process it. This is due to the constant volume of name checks, several million each year, combined with the FBI's current work on processing residual name checks from a batch of 2.7 million requests submitted by USCIS in December 2002, as compared to the NNCP's limited resources. Less than one percent of the requests are identified with a file containing possible derogatory information. If applicable, the FBI then forwards a summary of the derogatory information to the requesting agency. It is important to note that the FBI does not adjudicate the name check requests, but only provides available information to a requesting agency for its adjudication process.

How can I have my name check expedited?

The FBI tries to process its oldest name checks first. Customer agencies will occasionally request expedited handling of specific name checks. Criteria used to determine which name checks receive expedited handling are internal matters of each customer agency. The FBI does request that the number of expedited cases be kept to a minimum in fairness to the other pending name check requests. Because each customer agency determines which name checks are expedited, contacting Congressional representatives, the FBI's Office of Congressional Affairs, or the NNCP will only further tie up vital resources and will not contribute to the expediting of a name check.

Does contacting my Congressional representative expedite my name check?


No, the customer agency determines expedited handling. The FBI's policy is to be responsive to our customer's needs given the limits of our resources. Re-prioritization from multiple sources would convolute the customer agency's ability to manage their priority cases.

Is there a fee I can pay to expedite the process?

No. Processing times are a function of the volume of work versus the resources that can be applied to the task. Paying an additional fee would not speed up the name check process.

I am aware that some name checks have been completed that were submitted to the FBI after cases that remain pending. Why are the name checks not handled in the order in which they are received?

The vast majority of name check requests are completed in less than 60 days. Of those remaining, the FBI tries to complete the oldest name checks first. The time to complete any given name check varies. There are many factors that impact processing times such as the number of files to retrieve and review, a file's location and accessibility, case status, and workload all impact processing times. Another factor that might delay the processing of a name check request on a first in/first out basis is the number of requests for expedited handling received from a customer agency.

My Freedom of Information/Privacy Act request to the FBI resulted in a "no record" response. Given that, why is my name check request still pending?
Freedom of Information and Privacy Acts (FOIPA) requests are sometimes confused with name check requests. FOIPA provides copies of FBI files relevant to a specific FOIPA request. For FOIPA, the FBI search uses the name or information as provided in the FOIPA request. A FOIPA search determines whether there is an investigative file associated with an individual—a "main file" search. For a name check, "main files" and "reference files" are both checked, in an effort to protect our national security, in addition to searching a name in a multitude of combinations.

Who can I call to check on the status of my name check?

The FBI will only respond to status inquiries from its customer agencies. Please contact the organization receiving your original application. In Citizenship and Immigration cases, contact USCIS for the status.
 
Congratulations

TheRock20148 said:
Well, I did filled I-130 with vermont service center, do I will mail upgrade application/request to vermont. But for I-129F I guess we have to send it to Chicago office instead of service center as per instruction on I-129F form.

Denver or anyone else, could anyone inform me, how many guest or if any guest I can take with me to Oath ceremony tomorrow.

Thanks,
Rock,

I know you can bring guests but not sure how many if there is a limit.
Why don't you talk a look at this and send a PM to get some ideas.
Keep up posted :)
http://boards.immigrationportal.com/showpost.php?p=1495462&postcount=4876
 
Top