TheRealCanadian
Volunteer Moderator
bjorn said:It's for future employment during the labor certification process. Once in the AOS stage, it is current employment that the USCIS is looking for. ... The USCIS are looking for current job duties, salary statements, etc. (facts and objectivity) to verify that you currently have a legitimate job matching the LC and I-140 and have complied with the rules of the AOS game.
The problem with your assertion is that the "rules of the AOS game" don't require this at all. Permanent employment is ALWAYS future employment, at every step of the game. USCIS cannot require that the alien beneficiary already be employed at the I-140 stage, since a huge number of I-140s are filed on behalf of aliens currently outside the US, who have no legal ability to enter until the immigrant visa is issued.
The best way of proving intent, ability to pay, etc. for the future job is to already be hired by the employer in that position at the LC wage. That's why USCIS makes a lot of I-140 hurdles like ability to pay exceptionally easy if already in the LC job with the sponsoring employer. However, there is no requirement at any stage to be in the LC job or at the LC wage. If USCIS decides to question you, your job convincing them will be more difficult but it can be done.
In cases where there is a grey area, I always take the conservative route in order to not even coming close to potentially violating immigration policies. I don't want the USCIS to have anything on me that can cause them to deny my GC. Also, I believe that being offered the opportunity to immigrate to the US is something I am very grearful for and want to be the moral and ethical immigrant that Americans expect from immigrants.
That's a valid route to take, but keep in mind that the most conservative course doesn't always get you to the goal you want - and it's two totally different situations, taking advantage of the legal flexibility that the INA offers you, and being "moral and ethical". You do both at the same time.