I submitted FOIPA a year or so ago. A couple of months later got a letter saying that they got it and they were "working on it". They have been working on it for a year now and are still working on it. I'm sure they are on it 24/7 and I should get it any day now.
Of course it might a giant...
You are correct. Once I typed up the whole thing, I actually had a chat with an immigration attorney who advised me not to file it as a response because it is not required to file one. Luckily, I didn't have to file it at all, but I was ready to fight and go down swinging if I had to...
Of course you are assuming that you name check is cleared... I waited for the oath for 9 months and even then it took some persuation as you can see in my signature.
Two reasons behind name check delays
1. FBI is booked up and doesn't want to shell out money on more people
2. Laziness. Once a name is red flagged, they actually have to locate the file and actually have to go through the file and see what's up. Why do that if you can keep on feeding...
The answer is weak. He is using the Danilov defense that has been overturned by numerous courts. Most probably he's trying to buy some time.
Are you required to file an answer? Check out the attached document. It got everything you need to beat this crap.
K
P.S. Keep your head up dude...
Oh, what progress. I didn't get a single update through out the life of my case and even though I already got my citizenship, the (dis)information system still says that my case can not be found.
If money isn't an object, spend $350 and sue them. When you go to those infopass appointments, you are dealing with low level government workers who all the sudden get to play God. They will throw whatever crap that comes into their head to get rid of you. I got the same type of a response back...
You don't use those documents in the lawsuit because in the lawsuit you have to list your own specific circumstances. Those documents might be usefull if the AUSA decided to fight your case and you have to go into discovery, motion filing, etc.
K
Sfaizullah,
I wonder if it's standard blah blah blah that they put to cover their butts just in case. I think if they were ready to contest all that in court, they wouldn't have asked an extension. I also don't think they need an extension to preapre for a fight for jurisdiction. It's not...
Holly crap, Chertoff and Gonzales switched jobs and didn't leave a forwarding address! :)
In all seriousness though, I think that as long as the district attorney is served, you should be alright.
K
Unless you got some legal problems in the past (convictions, etc) that make your case less than straight forward, there is no need to hire a lawyer. There is only one barrier to pass in the whole process - the name check. I don't count the interview itself as a barrier 'cause unless you can't...
Although to be honest, I wouldn't put either one of them on the list of names since neither of them has anything to do with this. Stick with biggies - Mueller, Chertoff, and the Gonzales couple :)
K
If they put this piece of paper in front of me at the interview, I would have probably signed it. You know why? Because at the interview, it wouldn't cross your mind twice what kind of implications that signature will have. I bet 99.99999999% of people have never heard about a name check until...
I respectfully disagree. How will playing nice with the USCIS help future applicants? Unless somebody rocks the boat, they could care less. Senators and Congressmen for the most part could care less about what you need too because you can't vote for them and in the world of politics, 99% of the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.