Search results

Appeal to stop personal attacks I advise everybody to stop this personal slandering...this is the time for us to show unity... Here is my posting in Vermont Service center about the same issue.....I personally feel that we are really confusing...By my posting, I don't want to differentiate...

Re: Is filing I-485 before I-140 considered concurrent filing ?? I am sorry to answer your question with "no". You will not be part of this new process as your I-140 is already approved. -rajum

Though it is a speculation...that can be very much in the realm of possibilities if I take the spirit behind it...one need not take a literal meaning in that speculation...it means that they will not be many approvals for people who I-140 is already approved...if one takes literal meaning, then...

Let me hope that some kind of miracle and USCIS releases such a memo for me...I promise I will treat you all with beer for one full day.. -rajum

in support of dsatish in support of dsatish... I am not sure whether he was speculating or with some info.. when dsatish came up with 80% of adjudicators allocated for pilot program in service centers, I don't know his bases of his speculation...If I am asked to speculate, I will...

You are still a concurrent filer but not part of the new memo... Because the new product is starting on 4/30/2004 for people who I-140 has not approved...you are lucky, at least you can use AC 21 in the worst conditions... -rajum

Re: dsatish Brother, Don't look for logic in USCIS actions...they are not rational people..if anyone tries to look for rationality in USCIS actions, then that person might be soon visiting the doctor.. Take it easy and have a great weekend, -rajum:)

I agree with hidden_dragon....I also 100% with Murthy's assertion that if one type of case processing is given priority, another type suffers... I think this is crux of the discussion going on this thread for three days....the real and concrete solutions are: i) Increase the staff either...

Re: NSC Describes Its Plan for Concurrent Adjudications of I-140s/I-485s This posting gives some hope that Nebraska center is taking a comprehensive view ... -rajum

Cinta, I agree 100 % with you. Where there is a will, there is a way...and obviously I believe that there is no will... When I read on the other posting that it takes 2 years to train the IIO...To me it is a bull shit..I also realize that we don't have any other option other than...

Giving green card is some kind of social contract negotiated between the immigrants and US . Remind you that USCIS is not bestowing anything on us. The mandate of USCIS is to implement the laws...they are not doing any favor to us...USCIS is not USA, it is just any other federal agency ....one...

Edison, Unfortunately, I am finding on the other side of aisle with you in this thread....CIS new policies will satisfy us if it says that: i) No multiple EAD, AP and FP ii) Overtime policy as said by Cinta iii) Interim GC after six months.... As we all know, for these things we...

Re: Too many unknown parameters Lot of personal friends who are concurrent filers called me up and flaked me up...they believe that USCIS has good intentions in starting this new process.... to me whether they got good intentions or bad intentions does not matter but what matters is...

Looks like response to fund collection is pretty good...slow and steady we will win... -rajum

Re: Follow-up: Court of Competent Jurisdiction Good one... -rajum

I agree that only a lawsuit will force them...lets discuss on Sunday with Rajiv about FIFO.... -rajum

Edison, I agree with you on accountability. Regarding security checks... Have you heard about 'Kafkasque trial'. This was a novel written on the conditions in Eastren Europe after second world war. Kafka wrote the classic called "The Trial". Where "Joseph K" is arrested and is...

I140_2003, I have given the examples to illustrate the point that it is scientifically proven that one person doing one stuff will be more effective rather than one person doing different aspects... For I-140 there is no security check. For 485 there is a security check. That means...

Re: $$$$ I don't think any body is attributing malice to this...clearly I believe that USCIS never gave any serious thought on this either...to me this memo was devised to show to the court that they attempted to reduce the backlogs...this is not any serious effort... However, I am...

I agree with you ... -rajum