Recent content by boatbod

Well that was kind of my point. :) If she had been undecided, I'm sure she would have said that she wanted more time to review your file. By saying she was waiting for supervisor approval, she indicated either that she was (a) too junior to know any better, or (b) she was fine with the...

Sounds like you're going to be ok. I think if the IO had been planning to deny you, she wouldn't have mentioned anything about supervisor approval. More like "I'll have to look at this further" or we'll mail you a decision... something like that.

Hey, not all Brits are cheap! :D

http://boards.immigration.com/showthread.php?t=254465&highlight=4yrs+1+day

The certified court docket should be sufficient. Basically you just need official proof of the outcome of your case.

Oops, guess you should have read USCIS's M-476 Guide to Naturalization before going away for that long. Unless you have an approved N-470, or some other really good reason why you didn't break your continuous residence, you are unlikely to be approved for natz at this time. Investigate the...

Once one parent gets their USC, they can apply for a child's passport by submitting their natz cert along with the birth certificate, child's GC and other documents (e.g. marriage cert) as required by the State Dept. Follow the instructions given in the passport application package available...

Should be fine - its not an uncommon situation at all.

The public service will be when you come back to report the eventual outcome of your case. Right now all we have is armchair speculation.

As has been said many times before, back to back long trips make IOs very suspicious. If you can prove the trips were necessary to undertake the stated medical treatment, you might stand a chance to overcome the presumption of a break in residence. If not, I see a very high probability that...

Well I can't think why it would be particularly useful for that purpose.

Try the Baltimore tracker thread. http://boards.immigration.com/showthread.php?t=163811&page=47

Did you have an approved N-470? Can you prove that your overseas assignment was always known to be of a fixed length duration?

Thats not a good statement to make to an IO. If you want your natz to be approved, you better start thinking of ways to present your travels in a manner that shows you lived in the US and only visited India.

I did indeed read it. The subsequent discussions had wandered somewhat from the original question and somehow we'd deviated into the world of N-600K vs N-600.