Altneudorf
New Member
How long did he extend the ban for?
Never mind. It's March 31stHow long did he extend the ban for?
Fingers crossed! Happy New Year!Sadly predictable. Here’s hoping Biden reverses the EO soon after he gets sworn in. Remember that his immigration policy is not only strongly in favor of family reunification (the categories most affected by the PP) but also specifically praises DV as a principle.
Don’t think many people are at work at 4:30am on New Year’s DayWho has the official government press release or any official government communication agency?
No report on any official government sites yet it's already new year in the whole of US
Insinuating they had a lapse of judgment and those who have arrived now can enter since there is no official communication yetDon’t think many people are at work at 4:30am on New Year’s Day
Huh? What are you talking about ?Insinuating they had a lapse of judgment and those who have arrived now can enter since there is no official communication yet
From my vantage this is fake news
The WH has issued an official statement: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presiden...inue-present-risk-united-states-labor-market/
This is unfortunate. But there’s still hope for DV20 selectees. Biden may correct this once he assumes his role as POTUS.
I am sure people with the “subject to PP” annotation would not be allowed to board. I don’t think airlines need a list of names, they just need to be instructed to examine any annotations on the visas, just like they examine visas for expiry dates. (Certainly airlines have lists of things. I have personally seen an airline agent call a supervisor for a passenger who had the same name as someone on the US’s no-fly list.) And of course even if someone slipped past a sloppy airline clerk they’d be stopped by CBP.Sidebar: if you plan on still travelling during this extension, I would not recommend it. Some selectees have claimed that airlines have some sort of “list” barring travel.
This “list” apparently has names of people with valid visas, but are still subject to the proclamation. Airlines have told those people that they got that information from the American government (consulates/embassies).
(This information may not be reliable. But it’s still worth considering before you fly out and/or book a non-refundable ticket).
I am sure people with the “subject to PP” annotation would not be allowed to board. I don’t think airlines need a list of names, they just need to be instructed to examine any annotations on the visas, just like they examine visas for expiry dates. (Certainly airlines have lists of things. I have personally seen an airline agent call a supervisor for a passenger who had the same name as someone on the US’s no-fly list.) And of course even if someone slipped past a sloppy airline clerk they’d be stopped by CBP.
Very true! Some visa holders are stranded in foreign countries because they weren’t allowed to board their connecting flight to the US.
The risk may seem worth it. But it almost always ends up with you wasting your time and money.
I know a number of my friends who entered because they arrived before official communication was posted and they're in the US as we speak nowHuh? What are you talking about ?
Well, that has nothing to do with my comment.I know a number of my friends who entered because they arrived before official communication was posted and they're in the US as we speak now
That's what I was talking about
News credibility is authenticated by sourceWell, that has nothing to do with my comment.
so what was the fake news according to you?