VSC has traditionally had more online representation that NSC. and so it is natural that it looks like they are processing faster when in fact that may not be true. just more people willing to post their approvals.
but then it is also true that VSC has only half the number of 485 applications as compared to NSC. so unless there is more data available, the number of approvals showing up on rupnet is not any basis for comment.
what shd be commented upon is that the RD thati notice there are almost the same as the general NSC range except for the one RD in 3/03. that is sometihng that NSC has not seen much of.
I am surprised at people consistently attempting to justify why VSC "appears" faster than NSC with such imaginative excuses and that too with an air of such self-assurance... as if they have special insight into the goings on than anybody else who is on this forum.
Why cant people just accept the things as they appear? And it seems people do undestand that VSC has less load than NSC but think that somehow it is "as slow" as NSC... notwithstanding the fact that since recently, VSC current processing date is at "April 17 2002" whereas NSC is limping at "Feb 1 2002"
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.