FSW2015
Active Member
Thanks doc, wish you the best in life too!Sigh, this is so sad, for all of us.
FSW, you really are smart, kind, and respectful. I wish you the best in your life!
Thanks doc, wish you the best in life too!Sigh, this is so sad, for all of us.
FSW, you really are smart, kind, and respectful. I wish you the best in your life!
Thank you my friend!I don't know you but i wish you the best
you seem like a good person.
i, too, never thought i could miss out on becoming current, just judging from the past years, i never imagined this for even one second, and only started getting nervous around May, but nevertheless
Sometimes things fall apart so better things can fall into place
we have no way of knowing what would've happened if we had actually moved to the USA, there's no guarantee of a great life.......i've read stories of DV Winners in the USA and not all of it was pretty.
Things happen for the best, there are unlimited opportunities in this world of ours, no one thing can stop us
good luck
Thanks for the wishes, dear Susie! I hope that will happen and you will still be around, helping people hereWhat good grace! All the best for your future plans, though I do hope you'll pop up here again with a low case number in a future DV year!
You got me there. Guilty as charged, on both counts.he believes he's funny, because when you make bad jokes online you can't hear anybody booing you, let him be
maybe......i don't want to come off as a whiner.........I am a Canadian Citizen and i know there are tons of other people who needed this much more than i did who has just had their dreams unfairly snatched from them.
but is it not true that Non-Nepal/Iran winners in Asia have the least chance of becoming current than anybody in the entire DV lottery in the current scenario and approach employed by KCC?
it's a minor miracle to get picked in the first place, and then you've got the KCC working to ensure Nepal and Iran Maxes out. (apparently), but i still think there's something happening that we don't know about
but if your opinion is right, that the KCC is "holding the door" for Iranian APs and it's guaranteed every year Nepal maxes out, there has to be changes, these countries must be separated because if not, there really is no point for anyone in Asia not from Nepal or Iran to enter......the odds are stacked up against ROA more than anybody in the entire DV Lottery.
if they are trying to "return Iran to 2013", you mean like pay them back for 2014?, that's actually silly on their part because different people won each year, they haven't paid anybody back. People that got screwed in 2014 are still screwed
There are so many devastated people and I m honestly more upset for them than i am for myself. Especially those with families living in dangerous countries, there must be changes
anyway i just needed to vent my 2 cents, i wish everybody the best in their future
No I don't mean to pay Iran back. What I mean is that whatever caused the AP nightmare backlog in DV2014 might have been better organized for this year. That means that more Iranians would get approved through AP in time before the year ends.
The point you correctly made earlier is that the Iranian and Nepalese numbers are concentrated in the first 9000 case numbers. I have explained why that happens on my blog and here. But while that is the case, they will get more visas - and, if AP clearing times were not an issue. would probably max out (hit the 7% limit). It isn't that an Iranian case at 2321 is given an interview before an ROA case at a lower number, it is that the proportion of Iranians and Nepalese is so much higher per 1000 cases in the early numbers.
In terms of the odds of selection, an ROA case has the same chance of getting selected with case number AS1 as a Nepal or Iranian case.
No I don't mean to pay Iran back. What I mean is that whatever caused the AP nightmare backlog in DV2014 might have been better organized for this year. That means that more Iranians would get approved through AP in time before the year ends.
The point you correctly made earlier is that the Iranian and Nepalese numbers are concentrated in the first 9000 case numbers. I have explained why that happens on my blog and here. But while that is the case, they will get more visas - and, if AP clearing times were not an issue. would probably max out (hit the 7% limit). It isn't that an Iranian case at 2321 is given an interview before an ROA case at a lower number, it is that the proportion of Iranians and Nepalese is so much higher per 1000 cases in the early numbers.
In terms of the odds of selection, an ROA case has the same chance of getting selected with case number AS1 as a Nepal or Iranian case.
Canada is VERY expensive..just returned after 10 years for a while and it is worse than UK...so, Canadian citizens are not privileged in any sense..actually at disadvantage...Canada is not what it was...not sure why it ranks so high ...anyway this is not related with your post, just I could not help not saying something as Canada is NOT a good place to live ... it is falling down ...I do not expect a reply
We have discussed this with Silicon at length, to no avail. There is no science there. There are comparable numbers of people for ROA, Nepal and Iran in any given 1000 up to 8600. Perfectly statistically proportional to the number of people that entered from all those countries. ROAs with low CNs are welcome to get their visas, they don't come through.Yes, but there's no chance that Nepal or Iran gets
@Britsimon, we just finished talking about how Nepal/Iran are guaranteed to be put into the first 9000 cases, how you can say that, and then turn around and STILL say everybody has an equal chance to get the AS1 number is beyond me, obviously Nepal/Iran has a higher chance because they are guaranteed to be at least the first 9000, while ROA is spread throughout and can be placed anywhere, so obviously, a large number of ROAs are going to end up on the backend of the number spectrum......................no disrespect, but your determination to defend this continue to baffle me
my CN is 42XXX when should i expect interview
We have discussed this with Silicon at length, to no avail. There is no science there. There are comparable numbers of people for ROA, Nepal and Iran in any given 1000 up to 8600. Perfectly statistically proportional to the number of people that entered from all those countries. ROAs with low CNs are welcome to get their visas, they don't come through.
In KCC's estimation for this year, they would have needed about 5000 Nepalese to yield 3500, ROAs - 10000. Over-selected both, the same way they over-selected the totals in 2014 and 2015.
"Equal chance for AS1" is Britsimon's opinion, it's a fact.
Don't looking for AS1 or AS2 ! I think so AS1 is a hole!We have discussed this with Silicon at length, to no avail. There is no science there. There are comparable numbers of people for ROA, Nepal and Iran in any given 1000 up to 8600. Perfectly statistically proportional to the number of people that entered from all those countries. ROAs with low CNs are welcome to get their visas, they don't come through.
In KCC's estimation for this year, they would have needed about 5000 Nepalese to yield 3500, ROAs - 10000. Over-selected both, the same way they over-selected the totals in 2014 and 2015.
"Equal chance for AS1" is Britsimon's opinion, it's a fact.
Good advice, Anand, in general. Concerning the specific suggestion to "meet the local embassy personnel and sort out confusions before you really stand for the real interview", I am personally not sure whether this may cause unnecessary confusion and/or apprehension for some candidates, given that this will hardly be possible for most (it surely was not an option at the US Consulate we interviewed with). Other than that, your advice on avoiding AP, if at all possible, is certainly very sound.Again a disappointing end to a DV year. DV 2015. Congratulations to those who were selected and who made up to the bulletin. You guys are really lucky. All cases scheduled for interview in remaining of the July, August and September be 100% prepared and ready with all the proper documentations to get the visa in first interview and to avoid any APs as this is very risky as you may not be scheduled ever after. Check the local website of your US embassy, and tick out the documentations. To any confusions, meet the local embassy personnel and sort out confusions before you really stand for the real interview. The only one point is, you should get visa in your interview and should not be kept under AP, as August and September as busy months and you may not get another date conveniently.
Best of luck guys...
hey everybody , my cn is AF47xxx im now at NVC , i wonder if i get an interview date in 20 - 25 september would it be risky for my visa to be issued ? we know that after 30 september no visas will be issued , and AP takes long times .
thanks for advices ! i will when i get the second notification ! i ll think realistic and positive !Make sure you do not get AP. Make sure you have all the documents needed in advance. Like from now. Finally think positive.