Urgent help please! N400 interview.

It says you are currently employed with xxx Asia ltd, but that you have returned to parent company. Does that mean you are a xxx Asia ltd employee working at parent company location?

Also, the letter should indicate your employers physical work location when you were employed with xxx Asia ltd, and well as your current employers physical work location now.

I'm taking 2 letters with me to the interview. One is provided by the HR in HK. It's dated May 27 and the content states I was employed with them since Aug 2009 and the HK office is an affiliate of its parent company located in New York. The other one which I've just received mainly states that I was returned and now working @ the parent company located in NY.
 
It says you are currently employed with xxx Asia ltd, but that you have returned to parent company. Does that mean you are a xxx Asia ltd employee working at parent company location?

Also, the letter should indicate your employers physical work location when you were employed with xxx Asia ltd, and well as your current employers physical work location now.

Bob and Jack, I know this may sound odd. But may I have your email so that I can send you the 2 letters I have? As my interview will be on Tuesday I really need your opionion which letter I should show to the IO when being asked or I should show both of them. I appreciate your help!!!
 
Top